Cargando…

Why people donate their brain to science: a systematic review

The acquisition of brain tissue for research purposes is an important endeavour in research on ageing, pathological diagnosis, and the advancement of treatment of neurological or neurodegenerative diseases. While some tissue samples can be obtained from a living patient, the procurement of a whole b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Meng-Jiun Penny, Jowsey, Tanisha, Curtis, Maurice A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6863784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31538265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10561-019-09786-3
_version_ 1783471760991059968
author Lin, Meng-Jiun Penny
Jowsey, Tanisha
Curtis, Maurice A.
author_facet Lin, Meng-Jiun Penny
Jowsey, Tanisha
Curtis, Maurice A.
author_sort Lin, Meng-Jiun Penny
collection PubMed
description The acquisition of brain tissue for research purposes is an important endeavour in research on ageing, pathological diagnosis, and the advancement of treatment of neurological or neurodegenerative diseases. While some tissue samples can be obtained from a living patient, the procurement of a whole brain requires the donation from people after their death. In order to promote positive attitudes towards brain donation, it is essential to understand why people do or do not donate their brain to medical research. In 2018 we undertook a systematic review of the international literature concerning people’s attitudes, motivations, and feelings about brain donation. Five electronic databases were searched: Scopus, PsycINFO, Embase, Medline, and Google Scholar. Search terms included: (“brain donor*” OR “brain donation” OR “brain banking” OR “banking on brain”) AND (attitude* OR motivation* OR decision*”) AND (LIMIT-TO “human”) AND (LIMIT-TO (LANGUAGE, “English”)). Articles were analysed using the Framework for Assessing Qualitative Evaluations and a meta-ethnographic approach. Fourteen articles were included for review. The findings suggest four universal factors informing a person’s decision to donate their brain: (1) contextual knowledge, (2) conceptual understandings, (3) family/friends matter, and (4) personal experience, time and process. The findings also indicate that the way healthcare professionals present themselves can influence people’s feelings and attitudes towards brain donation. Healthcare and research professionals who are involved in brain donation processes must be mindful of the complex and multiple factors that influence donation outcomes. Effective and sensitive communication with potential donors and their family/friends is paramount.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6863784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68637842019-12-03 Why people donate their brain to science: a systematic review Lin, Meng-Jiun Penny Jowsey, Tanisha Curtis, Maurice A. Cell Tissue Bank Review Paper The acquisition of brain tissue for research purposes is an important endeavour in research on ageing, pathological diagnosis, and the advancement of treatment of neurological or neurodegenerative diseases. While some tissue samples can be obtained from a living patient, the procurement of a whole brain requires the donation from people after their death. In order to promote positive attitudes towards brain donation, it is essential to understand why people do or do not donate their brain to medical research. In 2018 we undertook a systematic review of the international literature concerning people’s attitudes, motivations, and feelings about brain donation. Five electronic databases were searched: Scopus, PsycINFO, Embase, Medline, and Google Scholar. Search terms included: (“brain donor*” OR “brain donation” OR “brain banking” OR “banking on brain”) AND (attitude* OR motivation* OR decision*”) AND (LIMIT-TO “human”) AND (LIMIT-TO (LANGUAGE, “English”)). Articles were analysed using the Framework for Assessing Qualitative Evaluations and a meta-ethnographic approach. Fourteen articles were included for review. The findings suggest four universal factors informing a person’s decision to donate their brain: (1) contextual knowledge, (2) conceptual understandings, (3) family/friends matter, and (4) personal experience, time and process. The findings also indicate that the way healthcare professionals present themselves can influence people’s feelings and attitudes towards brain donation. Healthcare and research professionals who are involved in brain donation processes must be mindful of the complex and multiple factors that influence donation outcomes. Effective and sensitive communication with potential donors and their family/friends is paramount. Springer Netherlands 2019-09-19 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6863784/ /pubmed/31538265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10561-019-09786-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Lin, Meng-Jiun Penny
Jowsey, Tanisha
Curtis, Maurice A.
Why people donate their brain to science: a systematic review
title Why people donate their brain to science: a systematic review
title_full Why people donate their brain to science: a systematic review
title_fullStr Why people donate their brain to science: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Why people donate their brain to science: a systematic review
title_short Why people donate their brain to science: a systematic review
title_sort why people donate their brain to science: a systematic review
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6863784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31538265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10561-019-09786-3
work_keys_str_mv AT linmengjiunpenny whypeopledonatetheirbraintoscienceasystematicreview
AT jowseytanisha whypeopledonatetheirbraintoscienceasystematicreview
AT curtismauricea whypeopledonatetheirbraintoscienceasystematicreview