Cargando…

Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations

Models of eye-movement control during reading focus on reading single lines of text. However, with multiline texts, return sweeps, which bring fixation from the end of one line to the beginning of the next, occur regularly and influence ~20% of all reading fixations. Our understanding of return swee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slattery, Timothy J., Parker, Adam J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6863793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31325039
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01636-3
_version_ 1783471763090309120
author Slattery, Timothy J.
Parker, Adam J.
author_facet Slattery, Timothy J.
Parker, Adam J.
author_sort Slattery, Timothy J.
collection PubMed
description Models of eye-movement control during reading focus on reading single lines of text. However, with multiline texts, return sweeps, which bring fixation from the end of one line to the beginning of the next, occur regularly and influence ~20% of all reading fixations. Our understanding of return sweeps is still limited. One common feature of return sweeps is the prevalence of oculomotor errors. Return sweeps, often initially undershoot the start of the line. Corrective saccades then bring fixation closer to the line start. The fixation occurring between the undershoot and the corrective saccade (undersweep-fixation) has important theoretical implications for the serial nature of lexical processing during reading, as they occur on words ahead of the intended attentional target. Furthermore, since the attentional target of a return sweep will lie far outside the parafovea during the prior fixation, it cannot be lexically preprocessed during this prior fixation. We explore the implications of undersweep-fixations for ongoing processing and models of eye movements during reading by analysing two existing eye-movement data sets of multiline reading.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6863793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68637932019-12-03 Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations Slattery, Timothy J. Parker, Adam J. Psychon Bull Rev Brief Report Models of eye-movement control during reading focus on reading single lines of text. However, with multiline texts, return sweeps, which bring fixation from the end of one line to the beginning of the next, occur regularly and influence ~20% of all reading fixations. Our understanding of return sweeps is still limited. One common feature of return sweeps is the prevalence of oculomotor errors. Return sweeps, often initially undershoot the start of the line. Corrective saccades then bring fixation closer to the line start. The fixation occurring between the undershoot and the corrective saccade (undersweep-fixation) has important theoretical implications for the serial nature of lexical processing during reading, as they occur on words ahead of the intended attentional target. Furthermore, since the attentional target of a return sweep will lie far outside the parafovea during the prior fixation, it cannot be lexically preprocessed during this prior fixation. We explore the implications of undersweep-fixations for ongoing processing and models of eye movements during reading by analysing two existing eye-movement data sets of multiline reading. Springer US 2019-07-19 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6863793/ /pubmed/31325039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01636-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Slattery, Timothy J.
Parker, Adam J.
Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations
title Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations
title_full Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations
title_fullStr Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations
title_full_unstemmed Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations
title_short Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations
title_sort return sweeps in reading: processing implications of undersweep-fixations
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6863793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31325039
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01636-3
work_keys_str_mv AT slatterytimothyj returnsweepsinreadingprocessingimplicationsofundersweepfixations
AT parkeradamj returnsweepsinreadingprocessingimplicationsofundersweepfixations