Cargando…
Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations
Models of eye-movement control during reading focus on reading single lines of text. However, with multiline texts, return sweeps, which bring fixation from the end of one line to the beginning of the next, occur regularly and influence ~20% of all reading fixations. Our understanding of return swee...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6863793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31325039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01636-3 |
_version_ | 1783471763090309120 |
---|---|
author | Slattery, Timothy J. Parker, Adam J. |
author_facet | Slattery, Timothy J. Parker, Adam J. |
author_sort | Slattery, Timothy J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Models of eye-movement control during reading focus on reading single lines of text. However, with multiline texts, return sweeps, which bring fixation from the end of one line to the beginning of the next, occur regularly and influence ~20% of all reading fixations. Our understanding of return sweeps is still limited. One common feature of return sweeps is the prevalence of oculomotor errors. Return sweeps, often initially undershoot the start of the line. Corrective saccades then bring fixation closer to the line start. The fixation occurring between the undershoot and the corrective saccade (undersweep-fixation) has important theoretical implications for the serial nature of lexical processing during reading, as they occur on words ahead of the intended attentional target. Furthermore, since the attentional target of a return sweep will lie far outside the parafovea during the prior fixation, it cannot be lexically preprocessed during this prior fixation. We explore the implications of undersweep-fixations for ongoing processing and models of eye movements during reading by analysing two existing eye-movement data sets of multiline reading. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6863793 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68637932019-12-03 Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations Slattery, Timothy J. Parker, Adam J. Psychon Bull Rev Brief Report Models of eye-movement control during reading focus on reading single lines of text. However, with multiline texts, return sweeps, which bring fixation from the end of one line to the beginning of the next, occur regularly and influence ~20% of all reading fixations. Our understanding of return sweeps is still limited. One common feature of return sweeps is the prevalence of oculomotor errors. Return sweeps, often initially undershoot the start of the line. Corrective saccades then bring fixation closer to the line start. The fixation occurring between the undershoot and the corrective saccade (undersweep-fixation) has important theoretical implications for the serial nature of lexical processing during reading, as they occur on words ahead of the intended attentional target. Furthermore, since the attentional target of a return sweep will lie far outside the parafovea during the prior fixation, it cannot be lexically preprocessed during this prior fixation. We explore the implications of undersweep-fixations for ongoing processing and models of eye movements during reading by analysing two existing eye-movement data sets of multiline reading. Springer US 2019-07-19 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6863793/ /pubmed/31325039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01636-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Slattery, Timothy J. Parker, Adam J. Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations |
title | Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations |
title_full | Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations |
title_fullStr | Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations |
title_full_unstemmed | Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations |
title_short | Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations |
title_sort | return sweeps in reading: processing implications of undersweep-fixations |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6863793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31325039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01636-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT slatterytimothyj returnsweepsinreadingprocessingimplicationsofundersweepfixations AT parkeradamj returnsweepsinreadingprocessingimplicationsofundersweepfixations |