Cargando…

Location-Specific Comparison Between a 3D In-Stent Restenosis Model and Micro-CT and Histology Data from Porcine In Vivo Experiments

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery restenosis is an important side effect of percutaneous coronary intervention. Computational models can be used to better understand this process. We report on an approach for validation of an in silico 3D model of in-stent restenosis in porcine coronary arteries and illus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zun, P. S., Narracott, A. J., Chiastra, C., Gunn, J., Hoekstra, A. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6863796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31531821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13239-019-00431-4
_version_ 1783471763571605504
author Zun, P. S.
Narracott, A. J.
Chiastra, C.
Gunn, J.
Hoekstra, A. G.
author_facet Zun, P. S.
Narracott, A. J.
Chiastra, C.
Gunn, J.
Hoekstra, A. G.
author_sort Zun, P. S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coronary artery restenosis is an important side effect of percutaneous coronary intervention. Computational models can be used to better understand this process. We report on an approach for validation of an in silico 3D model of in-stent restenosis in porcine coronary arteries and illustrate this approach by comparing the modelling results to in vivo data for 14 and 28 days post-stenting. METHODS: This multiscale model includes single-scale models for stent deployment, blood flow and tissue growth in the stented vessel, including smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation and extracellular matrix (ECM) production. The validation procedure uses data from porcine in vivo experiments, by simulating stent deployment using stent geometry obtained from micro computed tomography (micro-CT) of the stented vessel and directly comparing the simulation results of neointimal growth to histological sections taken at the same locations. RESULTS: Metrics for comparison are per-strut neointimal thickness and per-section neointimal area. The neointimal area predicted by the model demonstrates a good agreement with the detailed experimental data. For 14 days post-stenting the relative neointimal area, averaged over all vessel sections considered, was 20 ± 3% in vivo and 22 ± 4% in silico. For 28 days, the area was 42 ± 3% in vivo and 41 ± 3% in silico. CONCLUSIONS: The approach presented here provides a very detailed, location-specific, validation methodology for in silico restenosis models. The model was able to closely match both histology datasets with a single set of parameters. Good agreement was obtained for both the overall amount of neointima produced and the local distribution. It should be noted that including vessel curvature and ECM production in the model was paramount to obtain a good agreement with the experimental data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13239-019-00431-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6863796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68637962019-12-03 Location-Specific Comparison Between a 3D In-Stent Restenosis Model and Micro-CT and Histology Data from Porcine In Vivo Experiments Zun, P. S. Narracott, A. J. Chiastra, C. Gunn, J. Hoekstra, A. G. Cardiovasc Eng Technol Original Article BACKGROUND: Coronary artery restenosis is an important side effect of percutaneous coronary intervention. Computational models can be used to better understand this process. We report on an approach for validation of an in silico 3D model of in-stent restenosis in porcine coronary arteries and illustrate this approach by comparing the modelling results to in vivo data for 14 and 28 days post-stenting. METHODS: This multiscale model includes single-scale models for stent deployment, blood flow and tissue growth in the stented vessel, including smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation and extracellular matrix (ECM) production. The validation procedure uses data from porcine in vivo experiments, by simulating stent deployment using stent geometry obtained from micro computed tomography (micro-CT) of the stented vessel and directly comparing the simulation results of neointimal growth to histological sections taken at the same locations. RESULTS: Metrics for comparison are per-strut neointimal thickness and per-section neointimal area. The neointimal area predicted by the model demonstrates a good agreement with the detailed experimental data. For 14 days post-stenting the relative neointimal area, averaged over all vessel sections considered, was 20 ± 3% in vivo and 22 ± 4% in silico. For 28 days, the area was 42 ± 3% in vivo and 41 ± 3% in silico. CONCLUSIONS: The approach presented here provides a very detailed, location-specific, validation methodology for in silico restenosis models. The model was able to closely match both histology datasets with a single set of parameters. Good agreement was obtained for both the overall amount of neointima produced and the local distribution. It should be noted that including vessel curvature and ECM production in the model was paramount to obtain a good agreement with the experimental data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13239-019-00431-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-09-17 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6863796/ /pubmed/31531821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13239-019-00431-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zun, P. S.
Narracott, A. J.
Chiastra, C.
Gunn, J.
Hoekstra, A. G.
Location-Specific Comparison Between a 3D In-Stent Restenosis Model and Micro-CT and Histology Data from Porcine In Vivo Experiments
title Location-Specific Comparison Between a 3D In-Stent Restenosis Model and Micro-CT and Histology Data from Porcine In Vivo Experiments
title_full Location-Specific Comparison Between a 3D In-Stent Restenosis Model and Micro-CT and Histology Data from Porcine In Vivo Experiments
title_fullStr Location-Specific Comparison Between a 3D In-Stent Restenosis Model and Micro-CT and Histology Data from Porcine In Vivo Experiments
title_full_unstemmed Location-Specific Comparison Between a 3D In-Stent Restenosis Model and Micro-CT and Histology Data from Porcine In Vivo Experiments
title_short Location-Specific Comparison Between a 3D In-Stent Restenosis Model and Micro-CT and Histology Data from Porcine In Vivo Experiments
title_sort location-specific comparison between a 3d in-stent restenosis model and micro-ct and histology data from porcine in vivo experiments
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6863796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31531821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13239-019-00431-4
work_keys_str_mv AT zunps locationspecificcomparisonbetweena3dinstentrestenosismodelandmicroctandhistologydatafromporcineinvivoexperiments
AT narracottaj locationspecificcomparisonbetweena3dinstentrestenosismodelandmicroctandhistologydatafromporcineinvivoexperiments
AT chiastrac locationspecificcomparisonbetweena3dinstentrestenosismodelandmicroctandhistologydatafromporcineinvivoexperiments
AT gunnj locationspecificcomparisonbetweena3dinstentrestenosismodelandmicroctandhistologydatafromporcineinvivoexperiments
AT hoekstraag locationspecificcomparisonbetweena3dinstentrestenosismodelandmicroctandhistologydatafromporcineinvivoexperiments