Cargando…

Ultrasonographic data of cervical nerve roots diameter in 100 healthy adults

Clinically significant evaluation of the diameters of nerve roots by ultrasonography requires the establishment of a normal reference range. Although there are multiple reports of nerve root diameters in normal subjects, none of them describe how to normalize and compare data derived from different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kido, Miwako, Hinode, Yuji, Suwazono, Shugo, Akamine, Hiroyuki, Senoo, Hiroshi, Tatsuta, Naohisa, Fujiwara, Yoshihisa, Nakachi, Ryo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6864130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31763419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104776
_version_ 1783471830934224896
author Kido, Miwako
Hinode, Yuji
Suwazono, Shugo
Akamine, Hiroyuki
Senoo, Hiroshi
Tatsuta, Naohisa
Fujiwara, Yoshihisa
Nakachi, Ryo
author_facet Kido, Miwako
Hinode, Yuji
Suwazono, Shugo
Akamine, Hiroyuki
Senoo, Hiroshi
Tatsuta, Naohisa
Fujiwara, Yoshihisa
Nakachi, Ryo
author_sort Kido, Miwako
collection PubMed
description Clinically significant evaluation of the diameters of nerve roots by ultrasonography requires the establishment of a normal reference range. Although there are multiple reports of nerve root diameters in normal subjects, none of them describe how to normalize and compare data derived from different facilities that may differ in their methodology, equipment, techniques, and recording sites during data acquisition. The aim of the present investigation was to establish a dataset of normal values using 100 healthy subjects, and to identify the factors that affect the normal ranges of cervical nerve root diameters with regard to age, sex, laterality, and root segments. Compared to previous reports, smaller standard deviations (0.07–0.21) were obtained, and the coefficient of variation ranged from 0.02 to 0.08, which facilitated the precise evaluation of cervical nerve roots. Age had a significant effect on the sixth cervical nerve root (C6) in male participants, and sex had a significant effect at C6 in participants in their 60s. To establish the normal values suitable for use across different facilities, acquired using different equipment, further development of various aspects, including the sophisticated recording techniques and data-sharing capabilities, is essential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6864130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68641302019-11-22 Ultrasonographic data of cervical nerve roots diameter in 100 healthy adults Kido, Miwako Hinode, Yuji Suwazono, Shugo Akamine, Hiroyuki Senoo, Hiroshi Tatsuta, Naohisa Fujiwara, Yoshihisa Nakachi, Ryo Data Brief Neuroscience Clinically significant evaluation of the diameters of nerve roots by ultrasonography requires the establishment of a normal reference range. Although there are multiple reports of nerve root diameters in normal subjects, none of them describe how to normalize and compare data derived from different facilities that may differ in their methodology, equipment, techniques, and recording sites during data acquisition. The aim of the present investigation was to establish a dataset of normal values using 100 healthy subjects, and to identify the factors that affect the normal ranges of cervical nerve root diameters with regard to age, sex, laterality, and root segments. Compared to previous reports, smaller standard deviations (0.07–0.21) were obtained, and the coefficient of variation ranged from 0.02 to 0.08, which facilitated the precise evaluation of cervical nerve roots. Age had a significant effect on the sixth cervical nerve root (C6) in male participants, and sex had a significant effect at C6 in participants in their 60s. To establish the normal values suitable for use across different facilities, acquired using different equipment, further development of various aspects, including the sophisticated recording techniques and data-sharing capabilities, is essential. Elsevier 2019-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6864130/ /pubmed/31763419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104776 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Kido, Miwako
Hinode, Yuji
Suwazono, Shugo
Akamine, Hiroyuki
Senoo, Hiroshi
Tatsuta, Naohisa
Fujiwara, Yoshihisa
Nakachi, Ryo
Ultrasonographic data of cervical nerve roots diameter in 100 healthy adults
title Ultrasonographic data of cervical nerve roots diameter in 100 healthy adults
title_full Ultrasonographic data of cervical nerve roots diameter in 100 healthy adults
title_fullStr Ultrasonographic data of cervical nerve roots diameter in 100 healthy adults
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasonographic data of cervical nerve roots diameter in 100 healthy adults
title_short Ultrasonographic data of cervical nerve roots diameter in 100 healthy adults
title_sort ultrasonographic data of cervical nerve roots diameter in 100 healthy adults
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6864130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31763419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104776
work_keys_str_mv AT kidomiwako ultrasonographicdataofcervicalnerverootsdiameterin100healthyadults
AT hinodeyuji ultrasonographicdataofcervicalnerverootsdiameterin100healthyadults
AT suwazonoshugo ultrasonographicdataofcervicalnerverootsdiameterin100healthyadults
AT akaminehiroyuki ultrasonographicdataofcervicalnerverootsdiameterin100healthyadults
AT senoohiroshi ultrasonographicdataofcervicalnerverootsdiameterin100healthyadults
AT tatsutanaohisa ultrasonographicdataofcervicalnerverootsdiameterin100healthyadults
AT fujiwarayoshihisa ultrasonographicdataofcervicalnerverootsdiameterin100healthyadults
AT nakachiryo ultrasonographicdataofcervicalnerverootsdiameterin100healthyadults