Cargando…

Comparing the Impact of an Implicit Learning Approach With Standard Care on Recovery of Mobility Following Stroke: Protocol for a Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Although implicit and explicit learning approaches have been well investigated in healthy populations, there is less evidence regarding the relative benefits of each approach in clinical practice. Studies in stroke typically investigate single elements of an implicit learning approach (I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Louise, Burridge, Jane, Demain, Sara, Ewings, Sean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6864481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31687935
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14222
_version_ 1783471892841103360
author Johnson, Louise
Burridge, Jane
Demain, Sara
Ewings, Sean
author_facet Johnson, Louise
Burridge, Jane
Demain, Sara
Ewings, Sean
author_sort Johnson, Louise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although implicit and explicit learning approaches have been well investigated in healthy populations, there is less evidence regarding the relative benefits of each approach in clinical practice. Studies in stroke typically investigate single elements of an implicit learning approach (ILA; eg, reduced quantity feedback or an external focus of attention) within controlled environments. These studies predominantly evaluate performance, with few measuring this over time (ie, learning). The relevance and transferability of current research evidence into stroke rehabilitation is therefore limited. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the ILA with standard care in the acute phase following stroke, to generate data and insights to inform the design of a definitive trial, and to understand patient and therapist perceptions of the ILA. METHODS: This is a multicenter, assessor-blind, cluster randomized controlled pilot trial with nested qualitative evaluation. Stroke units (clusters) will be randomized to either ILA (intervention) or standard care (control) arms. Therapy teams at the intervention sites will be trained in the ILA and provided with an intervention manual. Those at the control sites will have minimal input from the research team, other than for data collection. Consent will be provided at the individual participant level. Once enrolled, participants will receive rehabilitation that focuses on lower limb recovery, using the designated approach. Measures will be taken at baseline, every 2 weeks until the point of discharge from hospital, and at 3 months post stroke onset. Measures include the Fugl Meyer Assessment (motor leg subsection), modified Rivermead Mobility Index, Swedish Postural Adjustment in Stroke Scale, and achievement of mobility milestones. Fidelity of the treatment approach will be monitored using observational video analysis. Focus groups and interviews will be used to gain insight into the perceptions of trial participants and clinical teams. RESULTS: The first site opened to recruitment in February 2019. The opening of a further 5 sites will be staggered throughout 2019. Results are expected in early 2021. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this mixed methods pilot study will be used to inform the design of a definitive study, comparing the ILA with standard care in acute stroke rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03792126; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03792126 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/14222
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6864481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68644812019-12-12 Comparing the Impact of an Implicit Learning Approach With Standard Care on Recovery of Mobility Following Stroke: Protocol for a Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Johnson, Louise Burridge, Jane Demain, Sara Ewings, Sean JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Although implicit and explicit learning approaches have been well investigated in healthy populations, there is less evidence regarding the relative benefits of each approach in clinical practice. Studies in stroke typically investigate single elements of an implicit learning approach (ILA; eg, reduced quantity feedback or an external focus of attention) within controlled environments. These studies predominantly evaluate performance, with few measuring this over time (ie, learning). The relevance and transferability of current research evidence into stroke rehabilitation is therefore limited. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the ILA with standard care in the acute phase following stroke, to generate data and insights to inform the design of a definitive trial, and to understand patient and therapist perceptions of the ILA. METHODS: This is a multicenter, assessor-blind, cluster randomized controlled pilot trial with nested qualitative evaluation. Stroke units (clusters) will be randomized to either ILA (intervention) or standard care (control) arms. Therapy teams at the intervention sites will be trained in the ILA and provided with an intervention manual. Those at the control sites will have minimal input from the research team, other than for data collection. Consent will be provided at the individual participant level. Once enrolled, participants will receive rehabilitation that focuses on lower limb recovery, using the designated approach. Measures will be taken at baseline, every 2 weeks until the point of discharge from hospital, and at 3 months post stroke onset. Measures include the Fugl Meyer Assessment (motor leg subsection), modified Rivermead Mobility Index, Swedish Postural Adjustment in Stroke Scale, and achievement of mobility milestones. Fidelity of the treatment approach will be monitored using observational video analysis. Focus groups and interviews will be used to gain insight into the perceptions of trial participants and clinical teams. RESULTS: The first site opened to recruitment in February 2019. The opening of a further 5 sites will be staggered throughout 2019. Results are expected in early 2021. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this mixed methods pilot study will be used to inform the design of a definitive study, comparing the ILA with standard care in acute stroke rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03792126; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03792126 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/14222 JMIR Publications 2019-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6864481/ /pubmed/31687935 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14222 Text en ©Louise Johnson, Jane Burridge, Sara Demain, Sean Ewings. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 05.11.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Johnson, Louise
Burridge, Jane
Demain, Sara
Ewings, Sean
Comparing the Impact of an Implicit Learning Approach With Standard Care on Recovery of Mobility Following Stroke: Protocol for a Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title Comparing the Impact of an Implicit Learning Approach With Standard Care on Recovery of Mobility Following Stroke: Protocol for a Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparing the Impact of an Implicit Learning Approach With Standard Care on Recovery of Mobility Following Stroke: Protocol for a Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparing the Impact of an Implicit Learning Approach With Standard Care on Recovery of Mobility Following Stroke: Protocol for a Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Impact of an Implicit Learning Approach With Standard Care on Recovery of Mobility Following Stroke: Protocol for a Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparing the Impact of an Implicit Learning Approach With Standard Care on Recovery of Mobility Following Stroke: Protocol for a Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparing the impact of an implicit learning approach with standard care on recovery of mobility following stroke: protocol for a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6864481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31687935
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14222
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonlouise comparingtheimpactofanimplicitlearningapproachwithstandardcareonrecoveryofmobilityfollowingstrokeprotocolforapilotclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT burridgejane comparingtheimpactofanimplicitlearningapproachwithstandardcareonrecoveryofmobilityfollowingstrokeprotocolforapilotclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT demainsara comparingtheimpactofanimplicitlearningapproachwithstandardcareonrecoveryofmobilityfollowingstrokeprotocolforapilotclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ewingssean comparingtheimpactofanimplicitlearningapproachwithstandardcareonrecoveryofmobilityfollowingstrokeprotocolforapilotclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial