Cargando…

Why Health Care Professionals Belong to an Intensive Care Virtual Community: Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice variation that results in poor patient outcomes remains a pressing problem for health care organizations. Some evidence suggests that a key factor may be ineffective internal and professional networks that limit knowledge exchange among health care professionals. Virtua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rolls, Kaye Denise, Hansen, Margaret Mary, Jackson, Debra, Elliott, Doug
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6864486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31687936
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14068
_version_ 1783471894019702784
author Rolls, Kaye Denise
Hansen, Margaret Mary
Jackson, Debra
Elliott, Doug
author_facet Rolls, Kaye Denise
Hansen, Margaret Mary
Jackson, Debra
Elliott, Doug
author_sort Rolls, Kaye Denise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical practice variation that results in poor patient outcomes remains a pressing problem for health care organizations. Some evidence suggests that a key factor may be ineffective internal and professional networks that limit knowledge exchange among health care professionals. Virtual communities have the potential to overcome professional and organizational barriers and facilitate knowledge flow. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore why health care professionals belong to an exemplar virtual community, ICUConnect. The specific research objectives were to (1) understand why members join a virtual community and remain a member, (2) identify what purpose the virtual community serves in their professional lives, (3) identify how a member uses the virtual community, and (4) identify how members used the knowledge or resources shared on the virtual community. METHODS: A qualitative design, underpinned by pragmatism, was used to collect data from 3 asynchronous online focus groups and 4 key informant interviews, with participants allocated to a group based on their posting behaviors during the previous two years—between September 1, 2012, and August 31, 2014: (1) frequent (>5 times), (2) low (≤5 times), and (3) nonposters. A novel approach to focus group moderation, based on the principles of traditional focus groups, and e-moderating was developed. Thematic analysis was undertaken, applying the Diffusion of Innovation theory as the theoretical lens. NCapture (QRS International) was used to extract data from the focus groups, and NVivo was used to manage all data. A research diary and audit trail were maintained. RESULTS: There were 27 participants: 7 frequent posters, 13 low posters, and 7 nonposters. All participants displayed an external orientation, with the majority using other social media; however, listservs were perceived to be superior in terms of professional compatibility and complexity. The main theme was as follows: “Intensive care professionals are members of ICUConnect because by being a member of a broader community they have access to credible best-practice knowledge.” The virtual community facilitated access to all professionals caring for the critically ill and was characterized by a positive and collegial online culture. The knowledge found was credible because it was extensive and because the virtual community was moderated and sponsored by a government agency. This enabled members to benchmark and improve their unit practices and keep up to date. CONCLUSIONS: This group of health care professionals made a strategic decision to be members of ICUConnect, as they understood that to provide up-to-date clinical practices, they needed to network with colleagues in other facilities. This demonstrated that a closed specialty-specific virtual community can create a broad heterogeneous professional network, overcoming current ineffective networks that may adversely impact knowledge exchange and creation in local practice settings. To address clinical practice variation, health care organizations can leverage low-cost social media technologies to improve interprofessional and interorganizational networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6864486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68644862019-12-12 Why Health Care Professionals Belong to an Intensive Care Virtual Community: Qualitative Study Rolls, Kaye Denise Hansen, Margaret Mary Jackson, Debra Elliott, Doug J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Clinical practice variation that results in poor patient outcomes remains a pressing problem for health care organizations. Some evidence suggests that a key factor may be ineffective internal and professional networks that limit knowledge exchange among health care professionals. Virtual communities have the potential to overcome professional and organizational barriers and facilitate knowledge flow. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore why health care professionals belong to an exemplar virtual community, ICUConnect. The specific research objectives were to (1) understand why members join a virtual community and remain a member, (2) identify what purpose the virtual community serves in their professional lives, (3) identify how a member uses the virtual community, and (4) identify how members used the knowledge or resources shared on the virtual community. METHODS: A qualitative design, underpinned by pragmatism, was used to collect data from 3 asynchronous online focus groups and 4 key informant interviews, with participants allocated to a group based on their posting behaviors during the previous two years—between September 1, 2012, and August 31, 2014: (1) frequent (>5 times), (2) low (≤5 times), and (3) nonposters. A novel approach to focus group moderation, based on the principles of traditional focus groups, and e-moderating was developed. Thematic analysis was undertaken, applying the Diffusion of Innovation theory as the theoretical lens. NCapture (QRS International) was used to extract data from the focus groups, and NVivo was used to manage all data. A research diary and audit trail were maintained. RESULTS: There were 27 participants: 7 frequent posters, 13 low posters, and 7 nonposters. All participants displayed an external orientation, with the majority using other social media; however, listservs were perceived to be superior in terms of professional compatibility and complexity. The main theme was as follows: “Intensive care professionals are members of ICUConnect because by being a member of a broader community they have access to credible best-practice knowledge.” The virtual community facilitated access to all professionals caring for the critically ill and was characterized by a positive and collegial online culture. The knowledge found was credible because it was extensive and because the virtual community was moderated and sponsored by a government agency. This enabled members to benchmark and improve their unit practices and keep up to date. CONCLUSIONS: This group of health care professionals made a strategic decision to be members of ICUConnect, as they understood that to provide up-to-date clinical practices, they needed to network with colleagues in other facilities. This demonstrated that a closed specialty-specific virtual community can create a broad heterogeneous professional network, overcoming current ineffective networks that may adversely impact knowledge exchange and creation in local practice settings. To address clinical practice variation, health care organizations can leverage low-cost social media technologies to improve interprofessional and interorganizational networks. JMIR Publications 2019-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6864486/ /pubmed/31687936 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14068 Text en ©Kaye Denise Denise Rolls, Margaret Mary Hansen, Debra Jackson, Doug Elliott. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 05.11.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Rolls, Kaye Denise
Hansen, Margaret Mary
Jackson, Debra
Elliott, Doug
Why Health Care Professionals Belong to an Intensive Care Virtual Community: Qualitative Study
title Why Health Care Professionals Belong to an Intensive Care Virtual Community: Qualitative Study
title_full Why Health Care Professionals Belong to an Intensive Care Virtual Community: Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Why Health Care Professionals Belong to an Intensive Care Virtual Community: Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Why Health Care Professionals Belong to an Intensive Care Virtual Community: Qualitative Study
title_short Why Health Care Professionals Belong to an Intensive Care Virtual Community: Qualitative Study
title_sort why health care professionals belong to an intensive care virtual community: qualitative study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6864486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31687936
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14068
work_keys_str_mv AT rollskayedenise whyhealthcareprofessionalsbelongtoanintensivecarevirtualcommunityqualitativestudy
AT hansenmargaretmary whyhealthcareprofessionalsbelongtoanintensivecarevirtualcommunityqualitativestudy
AT jacksondebra whyhealthcareprofessionalsbelongtoanintensivecarevirtualcommunityqualitativestudy
AT elliottdoug whyhealthcareprofessionalsbelongtoanintensivecarevirtualcommunityqualitativestudy