Cargando…
Calibration, Conversion, and Quantitative Multi-Layer Inversion of Multi-Coil Rigid-Boom Electromagnetic Induction Data
Multi-coil electromagnetic induction (EMI) systems induce magnetic fields below and above the subsurface. The resulting magnetic field is measured at multiple coils increasingly separated from the transmitter in a rigid boom. This field relates to the subsurface apparent electrical conductivity (σ(a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6864633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31683890 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19214753 |
_version_ | 1783471927599300608 |
---|---|
author | von Hebel, Christian van der Kruk, Jan Huisman, Johan A. Mester, Achim Altdorff, Daniel Endres, Anthony L. Zimmermann, Egon Garré, Sarah Vereecken, Harry |
author_facet | von Hebel, Christian van der Kruk, Jan Huisman, Johan A. Mester, Achim Altdorff, Daniel Endres, Anthony L. Zimmermann, Egon Garré, Sarah Vereecken, Harry |
author_sort | von Hebel, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multi-coil electromagnetic induction (EMI) systems induce magnetic fields below and above the subsurface. The resulting magnetic field is measured at multiple coils increasingly separated from the transmitter in a rigid boom. This field relates to the subsurface apparent electrical conductivity (σ(a)), and σ(a) represents an average value for the depth range investigated with a specific coil separation and orientation. Multi-coil EMI data can be inverted to obtain layered bulk electrical conductivity models. However, above-ground stationary influences alter the signal and the inversion results can be unreliable. This study proposes an improved data processing chain, including EMI data calibration, conversion, and inversion. For the calibration of σ(a), three direct current resistivity techniques are compared: Electrical resistivity tomography with Dipole-Dipole and Schlumberger electrode arrays and vertical electrical soundings. All three methods obtained robust calibration results. The Dipole-Dipole-based calibration proved stable upon testing on different soil types. To further improve accuracy, we propose a non-linear exact EMI conversion to convert the magnetic field to σ(a). The complete processing workflow provides accurate and quantitative EMI data and the inversions reliable estimates of the intrinsic electrical conductivities. This improves the ability to combine EMI with, e.g., remote sensing, and the use of EMI for monitoring purposes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6864633 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68646332019-12-23 Calibration, Conversion, and Quantitative Multi-Layer Inversion of Multi-Coil Rigid-Boom Electromagnetic Induction Data von Hebel, Christian van der Kruk, Jan Huisman, Johan A. Mester, Achim Altdorff, Daniel Endres, Anthony L. Zimmermann, Egon Garré, Sarah Vereecken, Harry Sensors (Basel) Article Multi-coil electromagnetic induction (EMI) systems induce magnetic fields below and above the subsurface. The resulting magnetic field is measured at multiple coils increasingly separated from the transmitter in a rigid boom. This field relates to the subsurface apparent electrical conductivity (σ(a)), and σ(a) represents an average value for the depth range investigated with a specific coil separation and orientation. Multi-coil EMI data can be inverted to obtain layered bulk electrical conductivity models. However, above-ground stationary influences alter the signal and the inversion results can be unreliable. This study proposes an improved data processing chain, including EMI data calibration, conversion, and inversion. For the calibration of σ(a), three direct current resistivity techniques are compared: Electrical resistivity tomography with Dipole-Dipole and Schlumberger electrode arrays and vertical electrical soundings. All three methods obtained robust calibration results. The Dipole-Dipole-based calibration proved stable upon testing on different soil types. To further improve accuracy, we propose a non-linear exact EMI conversion to convert the magnetic field to σ(a). The complete processing workflow provides accurate and quantitative EMI data and the inversions reliable estimates of the intrinsic electrical conductivities. This improves the ability to combine EMI with, e.g., remote sensing, and the use of EMI for monitoring purposes. MDPI 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6864633/ /pubmed/31683890 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19214753 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article von Hebel, Christian van der Kruk, Jan Huisman, Johan A. Mester, Achim Altdorff, Daniel Endres, Anthony L. Zimmermann, Egon Garré, Sarah Vereecken, Harry Calibration, Conversion, and Quantitative Multi-Layer Inversion of Multi-Coil Rigid-Boom Electromagnetic Induction Data |
title | Calibration, Conversion, and Quantitative Multi-Layer Inversion of Multi-Coil Rigid-Boom Electromagnetic Induction Data |
title_full | Calibration, Conversion, and Quantitative Multi-Layer Inversion of Multi-Coil Rigid-Boom Electromagnetic Induction Data |
title_fullStr | Calibration, Conversion, and Quantitative Multi-Layer Inversion of Multi-Coil Rigid-Boom Electromagnetic Induction Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Calibration, Conversion, and Quantitative Multi-Layer Inversion of Multi-Coil Rigid-Boom Electromagnetic Induction Data |
title_short | Calibration, Conversion, and Quantitative Multi-Layer Inversion of Multi-Coil Rigid-Boom Electromagnetic Induction Data |
title_sort | calibration, conversion, and quantitative multi-layer inversion of multi-coil rigid-boom electromagnetic induction data |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6864633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31683890 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19214753 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vonhebelchristian calibrationconversionandquantitativemultilayerinversionofmulticoilrigidboomelectromagneticinductiondata AT vanderkrukjan calibrationconversionandquantitativemultilayerinversionofmulticoilrigidboomelectromagneticinductiondata AT huismanjohana calibrationconversionandquantitativemultilayerinversionofmulticoilrigidboomelectromagneticinductiondata AT mesterachim calibrationconversionandquantitativemultilayerinversionofmulticoilrigidboomelectromagneticinductiondata AT altdorffdaniel calibrationconversionandquantitativemultilayerinversionofmulticoilrigidboomelectromagneticinductiondata AT endresanthonyl calibrationconversionandquantitativemultilayerinversionofmulticoilrigidboomelectromagneticinductiondata AT zimmermannegon calibrationconversionandquantitativemultilayerinversionofmulticoilrigidboomelectromagneticinductiondata AT garresarah calibrationconversionandquantitativemultilayerinversionofmulticoilrigidboomelectromagneticinductiondata AT vereeckenharry calibrationconversionandquantitativemultilayerinversionofmulticoilrigidboomelectromagneticinductiondata |