Cargando…
Measuring Spatial and Temporal PM(2.5) Variations in Sacramento, California, Communities Using a Network of Low-Cost Sensors
Low-cost sensors can provide insight on the spatio-temporal variability of air pollution, provided that sufficient efforts are made to ensure data quality. Here, 19 AirBeam particulate matter (PM) sensors were deployed from December 2016 to January 2017 to determine the spatial variability of PM(2.5...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6864658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31671841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19214701 |
_version_ | 1783471933511172096 |
---|---|
author | Mukherjee, Anondo Brown, Steven G. McCarthy, Michael C. Pavlovic, Nathan R. Stanton, Levi G. Snyder, Janice Lam D’Andrea, Stephen Hafner, Hilary R. |
author_facet | Mukherjee, Anondo Brown, Steven G. McCarthy, Michael C. Pavlovic, Nathan R. Stanton, Levi G. Snyder, Janice Lam D’Andrea, Stephen Hafner, Hilary R. |
author_sort | Mukherjee, Anondo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Low-cost sensors can provide insight on the spatio-temporal variability of air pollution, provided that sufficient efforts are made to ensure data quality. Here, 19 AirBeam particulate matter (PM) sensors were deployed from December 2016 to January 2017 to determine the spatial variability of PM(2.5) in Sacramento, California. Prior to, and after, the study, the 19 sensors were deployed and collocated at a regulatory air monitoring site. The sensors demonstrated a high degree of precision during all collocated measurement periods (Pearson R(2) = 0.98 − 0.99 across all sensors), with little drift. A sensor-specific correction factor was developed such that each sensor reported a comparable value. Sensors had a moderate degree of correlation with regulatory monitors during the study (R(2) = 0.60 − 0.68 at two sites). In a multi-linear regression model, the deviation between sensor and reference measurements of PM(2.5) had the highest correlation with dew point and relative humidity. Sensor measurements were used to estimate the PM(2.5) spatial variability, finding an average pairwise coefficient of divergence of 0.22 and a range of 0.14 to 0.33, indicating mostly homogeneous distributions. No significant difference in the average sensor PM concentrations between environmental justice (EJ) and non-EJ communities (p value = 0.24) was observed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6864658 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68646582019-12-23 Measuring Spatial and Temporal PM(2.5) Variations in Sacramento, California, Communities Using a Network of Low-Cost Sensors Mukherjee, Anondo Brown, Steven G. McCarthy, Michael C. Pavlovic, Nathan R. Stanton, Levi G. Snyder, Janice Lam D’Andrea, Stephen Hafner, Hilary R. Sensors (Basel) Article Low-cost sensors can provide insight on the spatio-temporal variability of air pollution, provided that sufficient efforts are made to ensure data quality. Here, 19 AirBeam particulate matter (PM) sensors were deployed from December 2016 to January 2017 to determine the spatial variability of PM(2.5) in Sacramento, California. Prior to, and after, the study, the 19 sensors were deployed and collocated at a regulatory air monitoring site. The sensors demonstrated a high degree of precision during all collocated measurement periods (Pearson R(2) = 0.98 − 0.99 across all sensors), with little drift. A sensor-specific correction factor was developed such that each sensor reported a comparable value. Sensors had a moderate degree of correlation with regulatory monitors during the study (R(2) = 0.60 − 0.68 at two sites). In a multi-linear regression model, the deviation between sensor and reference measurements of PM(2.5) had the highest correlation with dew point and relative humidity. Sensor measurements were used to estimate the PM(2.5) spatial variability, finding an average pairwise coefficient of divergence of 0.22 and a range of 0.14 to 0.33, indicating mostly homogeneous distributions. No significant difference in the average sensor PM concentrations between environmental justice (EJ) and non-EJ communities (p value = 0.24) was observed. MDPI 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6864658/ /pubmed/31671841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19214701 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mukherjee, Anondo Brown, Steven G. McCarthy, Michael C. Pavlovic, Nathan R. Stanton, Levi G. Snyder, Janice Lam D’Andrea, Stephen Hafner, Hilary R. Measuring Spatial and Temporal PM(2.5) Variations in Sacramento, California, Communities Using a Network of Low-Cost Sensors |
title | Measuring Spatial and Temporal PM(2.5) Variations in Sacramento, California, Communities Using a Network of Low-Cost Sensors |
title_full | Measuring Spatial and Temporal PM(2.5) Variations in Sacramento, California, Communities Using a Network of Low-Cost Sensors |
title_fullStr | Measuring Spatial and Temporal PM(2.5) Variations in Sacramento, California, Communities Using a Network of Low-Cost Sensors |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring Spatial and Temporal PM(2.5) Variations in Sacramento, California, Communities Using a Network of Low-Cost Sensors |
title_short | Measuring Spatial and Temporal PM(2.5) Variations in Sacramento, California, Communities Using a Network of Low-Cost Sensors |
title_sort | measuring spatial and temporal pm(2.5) variations in sacramento, california, communities using a network of low-cost sensors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6864658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31671841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19214701 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mukherjeeanondo measuringspatialandtemporalpm25variationsinsacramentocaliforniacommunitiesusinganetworkoflowcostsensors AT brownsteveng measuringspatialandtemporalpm25variationsinsacramentocaliforniacommunitiesusinganetworkoflowcostsensors AT mccarthymichaelc measuringspatialandtemporalpm25variationsinsacramentocaliforniacommunitiesusinganetworkoflowcostsensors AT pavlovicnathanr measuringspatialandtemporalpm25variationsinsacramentocaliforniacommunitiesusinganetworkoflowcostsensors AT stantonlevig measuringspatialandtemporalpm25variationsinsacramentocaliforniacommunitiesusinganetworkoflowcostsensors AT snyderjanicelam measuringspatialandtemporalpm25variationsinsacramentocaliforniacommunitiesusinganetworkoflowcostsensors AT dandreastephen measuringspatialandtemporalpm25variationsinsacramentocaliforniacommunitiesusinganetworkoflowcostsensors AT hafnerhilaryr measuringspatialandtemporalpm25variationsinsacramentocaliforniacommunitiesusinganetworkoflowcostsensors |