Cargando…
Sources of Variation in Assessing Canopy Reflectance of Processing Tomato by Means of Multispectral Radiometry
Canopy reflectance sensors are a viable technology to optimize the fertilization management of crops. In this research, canopy reflectance was measured through a passive sensor to evaluate the effects of either crop features (N fertilization, soil mulching, appearance of red fruits, and cultivars) o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6864711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31683546 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19214730 |
_version_ | 1783471946074161152 |
---|---|
author | Gianquinto, Giorgio Orsini, Francesco Pennisi, Giuseppina Bona, Stefano |
author_facet | Gianquinto, Giorgio Orsini, Francesco Pennisi, Giuseppina Bona, Stefano |
author_sort | Gianquinto, Giorgio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Canopy reflectance sensors are a viable technology to optimize the fertilization management of crops. In this research, canopy reflectance was measured through a passive sensor to evaluate the effects of either crop features (N fertilization, soil mulching, appearance of red fruits, and cultivars) or sampling methods (sampling size, sensor position, and hour of sampling) on the reliability of vegetation indices (VIs). Sixteen VIs were derived, including seven simple wavelength reflectance ratios (NIR/R460, NIR/R510, NIR/R560, NIR/R610, NIR/R660, NIR/R710, NIR/R760), seven normalized indices (NDVI, G-NDVI, MCARISAVI, OSAVI, TSAVI, TCARI), and two combined indices (TCARI/OSAVI; MCARI/OSAVI). NIR/560 and G-NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index on Greenness) were the most reliable in discriminating among fertilization rates, with results unaffected by the appearance of maturing fruits, and the most stable in response to different cultivars. Black mulching film did not affect NIR/560 and G-NDVI behavior at the beginning of the growing season, when the crop is more responsive to N management. Due to a moderate variability of NIR/560 and G-NDVI, a small sample size (5–10 observations) is sufficient to obtain reliable measurements. Performing the measurements at 11:00 and 14:00 and maintaining a greater distance (1.8 m) between plants and instrument enhanced measurement consistency. Accordingly, NIR/560 and G-NDVI resulted in the most reliable VIs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6864711 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68647112019-12-23 Sources of Variation in Assessing Canopy Reflectance of Processing Tomato by Means of Multispectral Radiometry Gianquinto, Giorgio Orsini, Francesco Pennisi, Giuseppina Bona, Stefano Sensors (Basel) Article Canopy reflectance sensors are a viable technology to optimize the fertilization management of crops. In this research, canopy reflectance was measured through a passive sensor to evaluate the effects of either crop features (N fertilization, soil mulching, appearance of red fruits, and cultivars) or sampling methods (sampling size, sensor position, and hour of sampling) on the reliability of vegetation indices (VIs). Sixteen VIs were derived, including seven simple wavelength reflectance ratios (NIR/R460, NIR/R510, NIR/R560, NIR/R610, NIR/R660, NIR/R710, NIR/R760), seven normalized indices (NDVI, G-NDVI, MCARISAVI, OSAVI, TSAVI, TCARI), and two combined indices (TCARI/OSAVI; MCARI/OSAVI). NIR/560 and G-NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index on Greenness) were the most reliable in discriminating among fertilization rates, with results unaffected by the appearance of maturing fruits, and the most stable in response to different cultivars. Black mulching film did not affect NIR/560 and G-NDVI behavior at the beginning of the growing season, when the crop is more responsive to N management. Due to a moderate variability of NIR/560 and G-NDVI, a small sample size (5–10 observations) is sufficient to obtain reliable measurements. Performing the measurements at 11:00 and 14:00 and maintaining a greater distance (1.8 m) between plants and instrument enhanced measurement consistency. Accordingly, NIR/560 and G-NDVI resulted in the most reliable VIs. MDPI 2019-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6864711/ /pubmed/31683546 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19214730 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gianquinto, Giorgio Orsini, Francesco Pennisi, Giuseppina Bona, Stefano Sources of Variation in Assessing Canopy Reflectance of Processing Tomato by Means of Multispectral Radiometry |
title | Sources of Variation in Assessing Canopy Reflectance of Processing Tomato by Means of Multispectral Radiometry |
title_full | Sources of Variation in Assessing Canopy Reflectance of Processing Tomato by Means of Multispectral Radiometry |
title_fullStr | Sources of Variation in Assessing Canopy Reflectance of Processing Tomato by Means of Multispectral Radiometry |
title_full_unstemmed | Sources of Variation in Assessing Canopy Reflectance of Processing Tomato by Means of Multispectral Radiometry |
title_short | Sources of Variation in Assessing Canopy Reflectance of Processing Tomato by Means of Multispectral Radiometry |
title_sort | sources of variation in assessing canopy reflectance of processing tomato by means of multispectral radiometry |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6864711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31683546 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19214730 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gianquintogiorgio sourcesofvariationinassessingcanopyreflectanceofprocessingtomatobymeansofmultispectralradiometry AT orsinifrancesco sourcesofvariationinassessingcanopyreflectanceofprocessingtomatobymeansofmultispectralradiometry AT pennisigiuseppina sourcesofvariationinassessingcanopyreflectanceofprocessingtomatobymeansofmultispectralradiometry AT bonastefano sourcesofvariationinassessingcanopyreflectanceofprocessingtomatobymeansofmultispectralradiometry |