Cargando…

Sources of Variation in Assessing Canopy Reflectance of Processing Tomato by Means of Multispectral Radiometry

Canopy reflectance sensors are a viable technology to optimize the fertilization management of crops. In this research, canopy reflectance was measured through a passive sensor to evaluate the effects of either crop features (N fertilization, soil mulching, appearance of red fruits, and cultivars) o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gianquinto, Giorgio, Orsini, Francesco, Pennisi, Giuseppina, Bona, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6864711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31683546
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19214730
_version_ 1783471946074161152
author Gianquinto, Giorgio
Orsini, Francesco
Pennisi, Giuseppina
Bona, Stefano
author_facet Gianquinto, Giorgio
Orsini, Francesco
Pennisi, Giuseppina
Bona, Stefano
author_sort Gianquinto, Giorgio
collection PubMed
description Canopy reflectance sensors are a viable technology to optimize the fertilization management of crops. In this research, canopy reflectance was measured through a passive sensor to evaluate the effects of either crop features (N fertilization, soil mulching, appearance of red fruits, and cultivars) or sampling methods (sampling size, sensor position, and hour of sampling) on the reliability of vegetation indices (VIs). Sixteen VIs were derived, including seven simple wavelength reflectance ratios (NIR/R460, NIR/R510, NIR/R560, NIR/R610, NIR/R660, NIR/R710, NIR/R760), seven normalized indices (NDVI, G-NDVI, MCARISAVI, OSAVI, TSAVI, TCARI), and two combined indices (TCARI/OSAVI; MCARI/OSAVI). NIR/560 and G-NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index on Greenness) were the most reliable in discriminating among fertilization rates, with results unaffected by the appearance of maturing fruits, and the most stable in response to different cultivars. Black mulching film did not affect NIR/560 and G-NDVI behavior at the beginning of the growing season, when the crop is more responsive to N management. Due to a moderate variability of NIR/560 and G-NDVI, a small sample size (5–10 observations) is sufficient to obtain reliable measurements. Performing the measurements at 11:00 and 14:00 and maintaining a greater distance (1.8 m) between plants and instrument enhanced measurement consistency. Accordingly, NIR/560 and G-NDVI resulted in the most reliable VIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6864711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68647112019-12-23 Sources of Variation in Assessing Canopy Reflectance of Processing Tomato by Means of Multispectral Radiometry Gianquinto, Giorgio Orsini, Francesco Pennisi, Giuseppina Bona, Stefano Sensors (Basel) Article Canopy reflectance sensors are a viable technology to optimize the fertilization management of crops. In this research, canopy reflectance was measured through a passive sensor to evaluate the effects of either crop features (N fertilization, soil mulching, appearance of red fruits, and cultivars) or sampling methods (sampling size, sensor position, and hour of sampling) on the reliability of vegetation indices (VIs). Sixteen VIs were derived, including seven simple wavelength reflectance ratios (NIR/R460, NIR/R510, NIR/R560, NIR/R610, NIR/R660, NIR/R710, NIR/R760), seven normalized indices (NDVI, G-NDVI, MCARISAVI, OSAVI, TSAVI, TCARI), and two combined indices (TCARI/OSAVI; MCARI/OSAVI). NIR/560 and G-NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index on Greenness) were the most reliable in discriminating among fertilization rates, with results unaffected by the appearance of maturing fruits, and the most stable in response to different cultivars. Black mulching film did not affect NIR/560 and G-NDVI behavior at the beginning of the growing season, when the crop is more responsive to N management. Due to a moderate variability of NIR/560 and G-NDVI, a small sample size (5–10 observations) is sufficient to obtain reliable measurements. Performing the measurements at 11:00 and 14:00 and maintaining a greater distance (1.8 m) between plants and instrument enhanced measurement consistency. Accordingly, NIR/560 and G-NDVI resulted in the most reliable VIs. MDPI 2019-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6864711/ /pubmed/31683546 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19214730 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gianquinto, Giorgio
Orsini, Francesco
Pennisi, Giuseppina
Bona, Stefano
Sources of Variation in Assessing Canopy Reflectance of Processing Tomato by Means of Multispectral Radiometry
title Sources of Variation in Assessing Canopy Reflectance of Processing Tomato by Means of Multispectral Radiometry
title_full Sources of Variation in Assessing Canopy Reflectance of Processing Tomato by Means of Multispectral Radiometry
title_fullStr Sources of Variation in Assessing Canopy Reflectance of Processing Tomato by Means of Multispectral Radiometry
title_full_unstemmed Sources of Variation in Assessing Canopy Reflectance of Processing Tomato by Means of Multispectral Radiometry
title_short Sources of Variation in Assessing Canopy Reflectance of Processing Tomato by Means of Multispectral Radiometry
title_sort sources of variation in assessing canopy reflectance of processing tomato by means of multispectral radiometry
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6864711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31683546
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19214730
work_keys_str_mv AT gianquintogiorgio sourcesofvariationinassessingcanopyreflectanceofprocessingtomatobymeansofmultispectralradiometry
AT orsinifrancesco sourcesofvariationinassessingcanopyreflectanceofprocessingtomatobymeansofmultispectralradiometry
AT pennisigiuseppina sourcesofvariationinassessingcanopyreflectanceofprocessingtomatobymeansofmultispectralradiometry
AT bonastefano sourcesofvariationinassessingcanopyreflectanceofprocessingtomatobymeansofmultispectralradiometry