Cargando…

Multiple Physiological Signals Fusion Techniques for Improving Heartbeat Detection: A Review

This paper presents a review of the techniques found in the literature that aim to achieve a robust heartbeat detection from fusing multi-modal physiological signals (e.g., electrocardiogram (ECG), blood pressure (BP), artificial blood pressure (ABP), stroke volume (SV), photoplethysmogram (PPG), el...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tejedor, Javier, García, Constantino A., Márquez, David G., Raya, Rafael, Otero, Abraham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6864881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31671921
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19214708
_version_ 1783471983020736512
author Tejedor, Javier
García, Constantino A.
Márquez, David G.
Raya, Rafael
Otero, Abraham
author_facet Tejedor, Javier
García, Constantino A.
Márquez, David G.
Raya, Rafael
Otero, Abraham
author_sort Tejedor, Javier
collection PubMed
description This paper presents a review of the techniques found in the literature that aim to achieve a robust heartbeat detection from fusing multi-modal physiological signals (e.g., electrocardiogram (ECG), blood pressure (BP), artificial blood pressure (ABP), stroke volume (SV), photoplethysmogram (PPG), electroencephalogram (EEG), electromyogram (EMG), and electrooculogram (EOG), among others). Techniques typically employ ECG, BP, and ABP, of which usage has been shown to obtain the best performance under challenging conditions. SV, PPG, EMG, EEG, and EOG signals can help increase performance when included within the fusion. Filtering, signal normalization, and resampling are common preprocessing steps. Delay correction between the heartbeats obtained over some of the physiological signals must also be considered, and signal-quality assessment to retain the best signal/s must be considered as well. Fusion is usually accomplished by exploiting regularities in the RR intervals; by selecting the most promising signal for the detection at every moment; by a voting process; or by performing simultaneous detection and fusion using Bayesian techniques, hidden Markov models, or neural networks. Based on the results of the review, guidelines to facilitate future comparison of the performance of the different proposals are given and promising future lines of research are pointed out.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6864881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68648812019-12-06 Multiple Physiological Signals Fusion Techniques for Improving Heartbeat Detection: A Review Tejedor, Javier García, Constantino A. Márquez, David G. Raya, Rafael Otero, Abraham Sensors (Basel) Review This paper presents a review of the techniques found in the literature that aim to achieve a robust heartbeat detection from fusing multi-modal physiological signals (e.g., electrocardiogram (ECG), blood pressure (BP), artificial blood pressure (ABP), stroke volume (SV), photoplethysmogram (PPG), electroencephalogram (EEG), electromyogram (EMG), and electrooculogram (EOG), among others). Techniques typically employ ECG, BP, and ABP, of which usage has been shown to obtain the best performance under challenging conditions. SV, PPG, EMG, EEG, and EOG signals can help increase performance when included within the fusion. Filtering, signal normalization, and resampling are common preprocessing steps. Delay correction between the heartbeats obtained over some of the physiological signals must also be considered, and signal-quality assessment to retain the best signal/s must be considered as well. Fusion is usually accomplished by exploiting regularities in the RR intervals; by selecting the most promising signal for the detection at every moment; by a voting process; or by performing simultaneous detection and fusion using Bayesian techniques, hidden Markov models, or neural networks. Based on the results of the review, guidelines to facilitate future comparison of the performance of the different proposals are given and promising future lines of research are pointed out. MDPI 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6864881/ /pubmed/31671921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19214708 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Tejedor, Javier
García, Constantino A.
Márquez, David G.
Raya, Rafael
Otero, Abraham
Multiple Physiological Signals Fusion Techniques for Improving Heartbeat Detection: A Review
title Multiple Physiological Signals Fusion Techniques for Improving Heartbeat Detection: A Review
title_full Multiple Physiological Signals Fusion Techniques for Improving Heartbeat Detection: A Review
title_fullStr Multiple Physiological Signals Fusion Techniques for Improving Heartbeat Detection: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Multiple Physiological Signals Fusion Techniques for Improving Heartbeat Detection: A Review
title_short Multiple Physiological Signals Fusion Techniques for Improving Heartbeat Detection: A Review
title_sort multiple physiological signals fusion techniques for improving heartbeat detection: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6864881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31671921
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19214708
work_keys_str_mv AT tejedorjavier multiplephysiologicalsignalsfusiontechniquesforimprovingheartbeatdetectionareview
AT garciaconstantinoa multiplephysiologicalsignalsfusiontechniquesforimprovingheartbeatdetectionareview
AT marquezdavidg multiplephysiologicalsignalsfusiontechniquesforimprovingheartbeatdetectionareview
AT rayarafael multiplephysiologicalsignalsfusiontechniquesforimprovingheartbeatdetectionareview
AT oteroabraham multiplephysiologicalsignalsfusiontechniquesforimprovingheartbeatdetectionareview