Cargando…
How are visual words represented? Insights from EEG‐based visual word decoding, feature derivation and image reconstruction
Investigations into the neural basis of reading have shed light on the cortical locus and the functional role of visual‐orthographic processing. Yet, the fine‐grained structure of neural representations subserving reading remains to be clarified. Here, we capitalize on the spatiotemporal structure o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6865374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31403749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24757 |
_version_ | 1783472067929178112 |
---|---|
author | Ling, Shouyu Lee, Andy C. H. Armstrong, Blair C. Nestor, Adrian |
author_facet | Ling, Shouyu Lee, Andy C. H. Armstrong, Blair C. Nestor, Adrian |
author_sort | Ling, Shouyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Investigations into the neural basis of reading have shed light on the cortical locus and the functional role of visual‐orthographic processing. Yet, the fine‐grained structure of neural representations subserving reading remains to be clarified. Here, we capitalize on the spatiotemporal structure of electroencephalography (EEG) data to examine if and how EEG patterns can serve to decode and reconstruct the internal representation of visually presented words in healthy adults. Our results show that word classification and image reconstruction were accurate well above chance, that their temporal profile exhibited an early onset, soon after 100 ms, and peaked around 170 ms. Further, reconstruction results were well explained by a combination of visual‐orthographic word properties. Last, systematic individual differences were detected in orthographic representations across participants. Collectively, our results establish the feasibility of EEG‐based word decoding and image reconstruction. More generally, they help to elucidate the specific features, dynamics, and neurocomputational principles underlying word recognition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6865374 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68653742020-06-12 How are visual words represented? Insights from EEG‐based visual word decoding, feature derivation and image reconstruction Ling, Shouyu Lee, Andy C. H. Armstrong, Blair C. Nestor, Adrian Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Investigations into the neural basis of reading have shed light on the cortical locus and the functional role of visual‐orthographic processing. Yet, the fine‐grained structure of neural representations subserving reading remains to be clarified. Here, we capitalize on the spatiotemporal structure of electroencephalography (EEG) data to examine if and how EEG patterns can serve to decode and reconstruct the internal representation of visually presented words in healthy adults. Our results show that word classification and image reconstruction were accurate well above chance, that their temporal profile exhibited an early onset, soon after 100 ms, and peaked around 170 ms. Further, reconstruction results were well explained by a combination of visual‐orthographic word properties. Last, systematic individual differences were detected in orthographic representations across participants. Collectively, our results establish the feasibility of EEG‐based word decoding and image reconstruction. More generally, they help to elucidate the specific features, dynamics, and neurocomputational principles underlying word recognition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6865374/ /pubmed/31403749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24757 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Ling, Shouyu Lee, Andy C. H. Armstrong, Blair C. Nestor, Adrian How are visual words represented? Insights from EEG‐based visual word decoding, feature derivation and image reconstruction |
title | How are visual words represented? Insights from EEG‐based visual word decoding, feature derivation and image reconstruction |
title_full | How are visual words represented? Insights from EEG‐based visual word decoding, feature derivation and image reconstruction |
title_fullStr | How are visual words represented? Insights from EEG‐based visual word decoding, feature derivation and image reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | How are visual words represented? Insights from EEG‐based visual word decoding, feature derivation and image reconstruction |
title_short | How are visual words represented? Insights from EEG‐based visual word decoding, feature derivation and image reconstruction |
title_sort | how are visual words represented? insights from eeg‐based visual word decoding, feature derivation and image reconstruction |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6865374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31403749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24757 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lingshouyu howarevisualwordsrepresentedinsightsfromeegbasedvisualworddecodingfeaturederivationandimagereconstruction AT leeandych howarevisualwordsrepresentedinsightsfromeegbasedvisualworddecodingfeaturederivationandimagereconstruction AT armstrongblairc howarevisualwordsrepresentedinsightsfromeegbasedvisualworddecodingfeaturederivationandimagereconstruction AT nestoradrian howarevisualwordsrepresentedinsightsfromeegbasedvisualworddecodingfeaturederivationandimagereconstruction |