Cargando…
Why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: A qualitative study
OBJECTIVE: Active surveillance (AS) is an increasingly utilized strategy for monitoring men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) that allows them to defer active treatment (AT) in the absence of cancer progression. Studies have explored reasons for selecting AS and for then switching to AT, but less...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6867634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31747396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225134 |
_version_ | 1783472109980221440 |
---|---|
author | Seaman, Aaron T. Taylor, Kathryn L. Davis, Kimberly Nepple, Kenneth G. Lynch, John H. Oberle, Anthony D. Hall, Ingrid J. Volk, Robert J. Reisinger, Heather Schacht Hoffman, Richard M. |
author_facet | Seaman, Aaron T. Taylor, Kathryn L. Davis, Kimberly Nepple, Kenneth G. Lynch, John H. Oberle, Anthony D. Hall, Ingrid J. Volk, Robert J. Reisinger, Heather Schacht Hoffman, Richard M. |
author_sort | Seaman, Aaron T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Active surveillance (AS) is an increasingly utilized strategy for monitoring men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) that allows them to defer active treatment (AT) in the absence of cancer progression. Studies have explored reasons for selecting AS and for then switching to AT, but less is known about men’s experiences being on AS. We interviewed men to determine the clinical and psychological factors associated with selecting and adhering to AS protocols. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with men with a low-risk PCa at two academic medical centers. Subjects had either been on AS for ≥ 1 year or had opted for AT after a period of AS. We used an iterative, content-driven approach to analyze the interviews and to identify themes. RESULTS: We enrolled 21 subjects, mean age 70.4 years, 3 racial/ethnic minorities, and 16 still on AS. Men recognized the favorable prognosis of their cancer (some had sought second opinions when initially offered AT), valued avoiding treatment complications, were reassured that close monitoring would identify progression early enough to be successfully treated, and trusted their urologists. Although men reported feeling anxious around the time of surveillance testing, those who switched to AT did so based only on evidence of cancer progression. CONCLUSIONS: Our selected sample was comfortable being on AS because they understood and valued the rationale for this approach. However, this highlights the importance of ensuring that men newly diagnosed with a low-risk PCa are provided sufficient information about prognosis and treatment options to make informed decisions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6867634 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68676342019-12-07 Why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: A qualitative study Seaman, Aaron T. Taylor, Kathryn L. Davis, Kimberly Nepple, Kenneth G. Lynch, John H. Oberle, Anthony D. Hall, Ingrid J. Volk, Robert J. Reisinger, Heather Schacht Hoffman, Richard M. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Active surveillance (AS) is an increasingly utilized strategy for monitoring men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) that allows them to defer active treatment (AT) in the absence of cancer progression. Studies have explored reasons for selecting AS and for then switching to AT, but less is known about men’s experiences being on AS. We interviewed men to determine the clinical and psychological factors associated with selecting and adhering to AS protocols. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with men with a low-risk PCa at two academic medical centers. Subjects had either been on AS for ≥ 1 year or had opted for AT after a period of AS. We used an iterative, content-driven approach to analyze the interviews and to identify themes. RESULTS: We enrolled 21 subjects, mean age 70.4 years, 3 racial/ethnic minorities, and 16 still on AS. Men recognized the favorable prognosis of their cancer (some had sought second opinions when initially offered AT), valued avoiding treatment complications, were reassured that close monitoring would identify progression early enough to be successfully treated, and trusted their urologists. Although men reported feeling anxious around the time of surveillance testing, those who switched to AT did so based only on evidence of cancer progression. CONCLUSIONS: Our selected sample was comfortable being on AS because they understood and valued the rationale for this approach. However, this highlights the importance of ensuring that men newly diagnosed with a low-risk PCa are provided sufficient information about prognosis and treatment options to make informed decisions. Public Library of Science 2019-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6867634/ /pubmed/31747396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225134 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Seaman, Aaron T. Taylor, Kathryn L. Davis, Kimberly Nepple, Kenneth G. Lynch, John H. Oberle, Anthony D. Hall, Ingrid J. Volk, Robert J. Reisinger, Heather Schacht Hoffman, Richard M. Why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: A qualitative study |
title | Why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: A qualitative study |
title_full | Why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: A qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: A qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: A qualitative study |
title_short | Why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: A qualitative study |
title_sort | why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: a qualitative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6867634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31747396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seamanaaront whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy AT taylorkathrynl whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy AT daviskimberly whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy AT nepplekennethg whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy AT lynchjohnh whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy AT oberleanthonyd whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy AT hallingridj whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy AT volkrobertj whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy AT reisingerheatherschacht whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy AT hoffmanrichardm whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy |