Cargando…

Why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE: Active surveillance (AS) is an increasingly utilized strategy for monitoring men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) that allows them to defer active treatment (AT) in the absence of cancer progression. Studies have explored reasons for selecting AS and for then switching to AT, but less...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seaman, Aaron T., Taylor, Kathryn L., Davis, Kimberly, Nepple, Kenneth G., Lynch, John H., Oberle, Anthony D., Hall, Ingrid J., Volk, Robert J., Reisinger, Heather Schacht, Hoffman, Richard M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6867634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31747396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225134
_version_ 1783472109980221440
author Seaman, Aaron T.
Taylor, Kathryn L.
Davis, Kimberly
Nepple, Kenneth G.
Lynch, John H.
Oberle, Anthony D.
Hall, Ingrid J.
Volk, Robert J.
Reisinger, Heather Schacht
Hoffman, Richard M.
author_facet Seaman, Aaron T.
Taylor, Kathryn L.
Davis, Kimberly
Nepple, Kenneth G.
Lynch, John H.
Oberle, Anthony D.
Hall, Ingrid J.
Volk, Robert J.
Reisinger, Heather Schacht
Hoffman, Richard M.
author_sort Seaman, Aaron T.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Active surveillance (AS) is an increasingly utilized strategy for monitoring men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) that allows them to defer active treatment (AT) in the absence of cancer progression. Studies have explored reasons for selecting AS and for then switching to AT, but less is known about men’s experiences being on AS. We interviewed men to determine the clinical and psychological factors associated with selecting and adhering to AS protocols. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with men with a low-risk PCa at two academic medical centers. Subjects had either been on AS for ≥ 1 year or had opted for AT after a period of AS. We used an iterative, content-driven approach to analyze the interviews and to identify themes. RESULTS: We enrolled 21 subjects, mean age 70.4 years, 3 racial/ethnic minorities, and 16 still on AS. Men recognized the favorable prognosis of their cancer (some had sought second opinions when initially offered AT), valued avoiding treatment complications, were reassured that close monitoring would identify progression early enough to be successfully treated, and trusted their urologists. Although men reported feeling anxious around the time of surveillance testing, those who switched to AT did so based only on evidence of cancer progression. CONCLUSIONS: Our selected sample was comfortable being on AS because they understood and valued the rationale for this approach. However, this highlights the importance of ensuring that men newly diagnosed with a low-risk PCa are provided sufficient information about prognosis and treatment options to make informed decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6867634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68676342019-12-07 Why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: A qualitative study Seaman, Aaron T. Taylor, Kathryn L. Davis, Kimberly Nepple, Kenneth G. Lynch, John H. Oberle, Anthony D. Hall, Ingrid J. Volk, Robert J. Reisinger, Heather Schacht Hoffman, Richard M. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Active surveillance (AS) is an increasingly utilized strategy for monitoring men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) that allows them to defer active treatment (AT) in the absence of cancer progression. Studies have explored reasons for selecting AS and for then switching to AT, but less is known about men’s experiences being on AS. We interviewed men to determine the clinical and psychological factors associated with selecting and adhering to AS protocols. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with men with a low-risk PCa at two academic medical centers. Subjects had either been on AS for ≥ 1 year or had opted for AT after a period of AS. We used an iterative, content-driven approach to analyze the interviews and to identify themes. RESULTS: We enrolled 21 subjects, mean age 70.4 years, 3 racial/ethnic minorities, and 16 still on AS. Men recognized the favorable prognosis of their cancer (some had sought second opinions when initially offered AT), valued avoiding treatment complications, were reassured that close monitoring would identify progression early enough to be successfully treated, and trusted their urologists. Although men reported feeling anxious around the time of surveillance testing, those who switched to AT did so based only on evidence of cancer progression. CONCLUSIONS: Our selected sample was comfortable being on AS because they understood and valued the rationale for this approach. However, this highlights the importance of ensuring that men newly diagnosed with a low-risk PCa are provided sufficient information about prognosis and treatment options to make informed decisions. Public Library of Science 2019-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6867634/ /pubmed/31747396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225134 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Seaman, Aaron T.
Taylor, Kathryn L.
Davis, Kimberly
Nepple, Kenneth G.
Lynch, John H.
Oberle, Anthony D.
Hall, Ingrid J.
Volk, Robert J.
Reisinger, Heather Schacht
Hoffman, Richard M.
Why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: A qualitative study
title Why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: A qualitative study
title_full Why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: A qualitative study
title_fullStr Why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: A qualitative study
title_short Why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: A qualitative study
title_sort why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6867634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31747396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225134
work_keys_str_mv AT seamanaaront whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy
AT taylorkathrynl whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy
AT daviskimberly whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy
AT nepplekennethg whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy
AT lynchjohnh whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy
AT oberleanthonyd whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy
AT hallingridj whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy
AT volkrobertj whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy
AT reisingerheatherschacht whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy
AT hoffmanrichardm whymenwithalowriskprostatecancerselectandstayonactivesurveillanceaqualitativestudy