Cargando…
Recommendations of older adults on how to use the PROM ‘TOPICS-MDS’ in healthcare conversations: A Delphi study
In shared decision making, the exploration of preferred personal health outcomes is important. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide input for discussions between patients and healthcare professionals. The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum DataSet (TOPICS-MDS) PROM is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6867646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31747443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225344 |
_version_ | 1783472112839688192 |
---|---|
author | Pel-Littel, Ruth E. Hofman, Cynthia S. Yu, Liesje Metzelthin, Silke F. Leeuwis, Franca H. Blom, Jeanet W. Buurman, B. M. Minkman, Mirella M. |
author_facet | Pel-Littel, Ruth E. Hofman, Cynthia S. Yu, Liesje Metzelthin, Silke F. Leeuwis, Franca H. Blom, Jeanet W. Buurman, B. M. Minkman, Mirella M. |
author_sort | Pel-Littel, Ruth E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In shared decision making, the exploration of preferred personal health outcomes is important. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide input for discussions between patients and healthcare professionals. The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum DataSet (TOPICS-MDS) PROM is a multidimensional questionnaire on the physical and mental health and wellbeing of older adults. This study investigates how the TOPICS-MDS could be used in individual healthcare conversations. We explored views of older adults regarding 1) whether the health domains they want to discuss are included in the TOPICS-MDS and 2) the comprehensibility of the TOPICS-MDS for healthcare conversations with older adults. A three-round Delphi study was conducted. A total of 57 older adults participated in the study, the mean (SD) age was 71.5 (8.5) years, and 78.9% of the participants were female. The participants were divided into four panels based on educational level and cultural background. We used online questionnaires and focus groups. Consensus was pre-defined to be the point when ≥75% of the participants agreed that a domain was important or very important (scored on a 5-point Likert scale). The inter-expert agreement was computed for Round 1 and 3 with Kendall’s W. Round 2 was a focus-group. Qualitative data were analyzed by content analysis. Older adults considered 'functional limitations', 'emotional wellbeing', 'social functioning' and 'quality of life' to be important domains of the TOPICS-MDS to discuss in healthcare conversations. The participants added 'coping with stress', 'dealing with health conditions and the effects on life' as extra domains for healthcare conversations. Challenges regarding the comprehensibility of the TOPICS-MDS included difficult words and lengthy or sensitive questions. Questions that included multiple topics were difficult to understand. The TOPICS-MDS covers the domains of life that older adults value as important to discuss with healthcare professionals, and two additional domains were identified. For older adults with a low level of education or a culturally diverse background, the TOPICS-MDS needs to be adjusted for comprehensibility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6867646 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68676462019-12-07 Recommendations of older adults on how to use the PROM ‘TOPICS-MDS’ in healthcare conversations: A Delphi study Pel-Littel, Ruth E. Hofman, Cynthia S. Yu, Liesje Metzelthin, Silke F. Leeuwis, Franca H. Blom, Jeanet W. Buurman, B. M. Minkman, Mirella M. PLoS One Research Article In shared decision making, the exploration of preferred personal health outcomes is important. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide input for discussions between patients and healthcare professionals. The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum DataSet (TOPICS-MDS) PROM is a multidimensional questionnaire on the physical and mental health and wellbeing of older adults. This study investigates how the TOPICS-MDS could be used in individual healthcare conversations. We explored views of older adults regarding 1) whether the health domains they want to discuss are included in the TOPICS-MDS and 2) the comprehensibility of the TOPICS-MDS for healthcare conversations with older adults. A three-round Delphi study was conducted. A total of 57 older adults participated in the study, the mean (SD) age was 71.5 (8.5) years, and 78.9% of the participants were female. The participants were divided into four panels based on educational level and cultural background. We used online questionnaires and focus groups. Consensus was pre-defined to be the point when ≥75% of the participants agreed that a domain was important or very important (scored on a 5-point Likert scale). The inter-expert agreement was computed for Round 1 and 3 with Kendall’s W. Round 2 was a focus-group. Qualitative data were analyzed by content analysis. Older adults considered 'functional limitations', 'emotional wellbeing', 'social functioning' and 'quality of life' to be important domains of the TOPICS-MDS to discuss in healthcare conversations. The participants added 'coping with stress', 'dealing with health conditions and the effects on life' as extra domains for healthcare conversations. Challenges regarding the comprehensibility of the TOPICS-MDS included difficult words and lengthy or sensitive questions. Questions that included multiple topics were difficult to understand. The TOPICS-MDS covers the domains of life that older adults value as important to discuss with healthcare professionals, and two additional domains were identified. For older adults with a low level of education or a culturally diverse background, the TOPICS-MDS needs to be adjusted for comprehensibility. Public Library of Science 2019-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6867646/ /pubmed/31747443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225344 Text en © 2019 Pel-Littel et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pel-Littel, Ruth E. Hofman, Cynthia S. Yu, Liesje Metzelthin, Silke F. Leeuwis, Franca H. Blom, Jeanet W. Buurman, B. M. Minkman, Mirella M. Recommendations of older adults on how to use the PROM ‘TOPICS-MDS’ in healthcare conversations: A Delphi study |
title | Recommendations of older adults on how to use the PROM ‘TOPICS-MDS’ in healthcare conversations: A Delphi study |
title_full | Recommendations of older adults on how to use the PROM ‘TOPICS-MDS’ in healthcare conversations: A Delphi study |
title_fullStr | Recommendations of older adults on how to use the PROM ‘TOPICS-MDS’ in healthcare conversations: A Delphi study |
title_full_unstemmed | Recommendations of older adults on how to use the PROM ‘TOPICS-MDS’ in healthcare conversations: A Delphi study |
title_short | Recommendations of older adults on how to use the PROM ‘TOPICS-MDS’ in healthcare conversations: A Delphi study |
title_sort | recommendations of older adults on how to use the prom ‘topics-mds’ in healthcare conversations: a delphi study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6867646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31747443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225344 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pellittelruthe recommendationsofolderadultsonhowtousethepromtopicsmdsinhealthcareconversationsadelphistudy AT hofmancynthias recommendationsofolderadultsonhowtousethepromtopicsmdsinhealthcareconversationsadelphistudy AT yuliesje recommendationsofolderadultsonhowtousethepromtopicsmdsinhealthcareconversationsadelphistudy AT metzelthinsilkef recommendationsofolderadultsonhowtousethepromtopicsmdsinhealthcareconversationsadelphistudy AT leeuwisfrancah recommendationsofolderadultsonhowtousethepromtopicsmdsinhealthcareconversationsadelphistudy AT blomjeanetw recommendationsofolderadultsonhowtousethepromtopicsmdsinhealthcareconversationsadelphistudy AT buurmanbm recommendationsofolderadultsonhowtousethepromtopicsmdsinhealthcareconversationsadelphistudy AT minkmanmirellam recommendationsofolderadultsonhowtousethepromtopicsmdsinhealthcareconversationsadelphistudy |