Cargando…

Antegrade intramedullary nail versus plate fixation in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: An update meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding the surgical treatment of humeral shaft fracture. The present meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety between antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) and plating for humeral shaft fracture. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wen, Hongjie, Zhu, Shouyan, Li, Canzhang, Chen, Zhong, Yang, Huagang, Xu, Yongqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6867742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31725653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017952
_version_ 1783472129937768448
author Wen, Hongjie
Zhu, Shouyan
Li, Canzhang
Chen, Zhong
Yang, Huagang
Xu, Yongqing
author_facet Wen, Hongjie
Zhu, Shouyan
Li, Canzhang
Chen, Zhong
Yang, Huagang
Xu, Yongqing
author_sort Wen, Hongjie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding the surgical treatment of humeral shaft fracture. The present meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety between antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) and plating for humeral shaft fracture. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Clinical Trails, Ovid, ISI Web of Science, and Chinese databases including WanFang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched through March 10, 2019. The Review Manager software was adapted to perform statistical analysis and relative risk (RR) were used for the binary variables, and weighted mean difference and standardized mean difference (SMD) were used to measure the continuous variables. Each variable included its 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A total of 15 trials with 839 patients were included in the analysis. There was significant difference between IMN group and plate group in blood loss (SMD = 3.49, 95% CI: 1.19, 5.79, P = .003) and postoperative infections (RR = 3.04, 95% CI: 1.49, 6.24, P = .002). Additionally, significant difference was observed between minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) group and IMN group in nonunion rate (RR = 3.20, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.84, P = .02). Statistical significance was also observed between the open reduction plate fixation group and IMN group in restriction of shoulder and elbow joints results (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.96, P < .05). No significant difference was observed for the operation time, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, nerve injury, delayed union, reoperation in either group. CONCLUSION: IMN may be superior to plate in reducing blood loss and postoperative infections for the treatment of humeral shaft fracture. However, MIPO was superior to IMN group in nonunion and equal to IMN in other parameters. Further research is required and future studies should include analysis of assessments at different stages and follow-up after removal of the implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6867742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68677422020-01-14 Antegrade intramedullary nail versus plate fixation in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: An update meta-analysis Wen, Hongjie Zhu, Shouyan Li, Canzhang Chen, Zhong Yang, Huagang Xu, Yongqing Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding the surgical treatment of humeral shaft fracture. The present meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety between antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) and plating for humeral shaft fracture. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Clinical Trails, Ovid, ISI Web of Science, and Chinese databases including WanFang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched through March 10, 2019. The Review Manager software was adapted to perform statistical analysis and relative risk (RR) were used for the binary variables, and weighted mean difference and standardized mean difference (SMD) were used to measure the continuous variables. Each variable included its 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A total of 15 trials with 839 patients were included in the analysis. There was significant difference between IMN group and plate group in blood loss (SMD = 3.49, 95% CI: 1.19, 5.79, P = .003) and postoperative infections (RR = 3.04, 95% CI: 1.49, 6.24, P = .002). Additionally, significant difference was observed between minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) group and IMN group in nonunion rate (RR = 3.20, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.84, P = .02). Statistical significance was also observed between the open reduction plate fixation group and IMN group in restriction of shoulder and elbow joints results (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.96, P < .05). No significant difference was observed for the operation time, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, nerve injury, delayed union, reoperation in either group. CONCLUSION: IMN may be superior to plate in reducing blood loss and postoperative infections for the treatment of humeral shaft fracture. However, MIPO was superior to IMN group in nonunion and equal to IMN in other parameters. Further research is required and future studies should include analysis of assessments at different stages and follow-up after removal of the implants. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6867742/ /pubmed/31725653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017952 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Wen, Hongjie
Zhu, Shouyan
Li, Canzhang
Chen, Zhong
Yang, Huagang
Xu, Yongqing
Antegrade intramedullary nail versus plate fixation in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: An update meta-analysis
title Antegrade intramedullary nail versus plate fixation in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: An update meta-analysis
title_full Antegrade intramedullary nail versus plate fixation in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: An update meta-analysis
title_fullStr Antegrade intramedullary nail versus plate fixation in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: An update meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Antegrade intramedullary nail versus plate fixation in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: An update meta-analysis
title_short Antegrade intramedullary nail versus plate fixation in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: An update meta-analysis
title_sort antegrade intramedullary nail versus plate fixation in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: an update meta-analysis
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6867742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31725653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017952
work_keys_str_mv AT wenhongjie antegradeintramedullarynailversusplatefixationinthetreatmentofhumeralshaftfracturesanupdatemetaanalysis
AT zhushouyan antegradeintramedullarynailversusplatefixationinthetreatmentofhumeralshaftfracturesanupdatemetaanalysis
AT licanzhang antegradeintramedullarynailversusplatefixationinthetreatmentofhumeralshaftfracturesanupdatemetaanalysis
AT chenzhong antegradeintramedullarynailversusplatefixationinthetreatmentofhumeralshaftfracturesanupdatemetaanalysis
AT yanghuagang antegradeintramedullarynailversusplatefixationinthetreatmentofhumeralshaftfracturesanupdatemetaanalysis
AT xuyongqing antegradeintramedullarynailversusplatefixationinthetreatmentofhumeralshaftfracturesanupdatemetaanalysis