Cargando…

Effect of Theta Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Phase-Locked Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation on Learning and Cognitive Control

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is emerging as a robust treatment alternative for major depressive disorder, with a potential for achieving higher remission rates by providing targeted stimulation to underlying brain networks, such as the salience network (SN). Growing evidence suggests that t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mansouri, Farrokh, Shanbour, Alaa, Mazza, Frank, Fettes, Peter, Zariffa, José, Downar, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6867974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31798397
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01181
_version_ 1783472164364615680
author Mansouri, Farrokh
Shanbour, Alaa
Mazza, Frank
Fettes, Peter
Zariffa, José
Downar, Jonathan
author_facet Mansouri, Farrokh
Shanbour, Alaa
Mazza, Frank
Fettes, Peter
Zariffa, José
Downar, Jonathan
author_sort Mansouri, Farrokh
collection PubMed
description Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is emerging as a robust treatment alternative for major depressive disorder, with a potential for achieving higher remission rates by providing targeted stimulation to underlying brain networks, such as the salience network (SN). Growing evidence suggests that these therapeutic effects are dependent on the frequency and phase synchrony between SN oscillations and stimulation as well as the task-specific state of the SN during stimulation. However, the development of phase-synchronized non-invasive stimulation has proved challenging until recently. Here, we use a phase-locked pulsed brain stimulation approach to study the effects of two NIBS methods: transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) versus phase-locked transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS), on the SN during an SN activating task. 20 healthy volunteers participated in the study. Each volunteer partook in four sessions, receiving one stimulation type at random (theta-tACS, peak tPCS, trough tPCS or sham) while undergoing a learning game, followed by an unstimulated test based on learned material. Each session lasted approximately 1.5 h, with an interval of at least 2 days to allow for washout and to avoid cross-over effects. Our results showed no statistically significant effect of stimulation on the event related potential (ERP) recordings, resting electroencephalogram (EEG), and the performance of the volunteers. While stimulation effects were not apparent in this study, the nominal performance of the phase-locking algorithm offers a technical foundation for further research in determining effective stimulation paradigms and conditions. Specifically, future work should investigate stronger stimulation and true task-specific stimulation of SN nodes responsible for the task as well as their recording. If refined, NIBS could offer an effective, homebased treatment option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6867974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68679742019-12-03 Effect of Theta Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Phase-Locked Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation on Learning and Cognitive Control Mansouri, Farrokh Shanbour, Alaa Mazza, Frank Fettes, Peter Zariffa, José Downar, Jonathan Front Neurosci Neuroscience Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is emerging as a robust treatment alternative for major depressive disorder, with a potential for achieving higher remission rates by providing targeted stimulation to underlying brain networks, such as the salience network (SN). Growing evidence suggests that these therapeutic effects are dependent on the frequency and phase synchrony between SN oscillations and stimulation as well as the task-specific state of the SN during stimulation. However, the development of phase-synchronized non-invasive stimulation has proved challenging until recently. Here, we use a phase-locked pulsed brain stimulation approach to study the effects of two NIBS methods: transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) versus phase-locked transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS), on the SN during an SN activating task. 20 healthy volunteers participated in the study. Each volunteer partook in four sessions, receiving one stimulation type at random (theta-tACS, peak tPCS, trough tPCS or sham) while undergoing a learning game, followed by an unstimulated test based on learned material. Each session lasted approximately 1.5 h, with an interval of at least 2 days to allow for washout and to avoid cross-over effects. Our results showed no statistically significant effect of stimulation on the event related potential (ERP) recordings, resting electroencephalogram (EEG), and the performance of the volunteers. While stimulation effects were not apparent in this study, the nominal performance of the phase-locking algorithm offers a technical foundation for further research in determining effective stimulation paradigms and conditions. Specifically, future work should investigate stronger stimulation and true task-specific stimulation of SN nodes responsible for the task as well as their recording. If refined, NIBS could offer an effective, homebased treatment option. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6867974/ /pubmed/31798397 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01181 Text en Copyright © 2019 Mansouri, Shanbour, Mazza, Fettes, Zariffa and Downar. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Mansouri, Farrokh
Shanbour, Alaa
Mazza, Frank
Fettes, Peter
Zariffa, José
Downar, Jonathan
Effect of Theta Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Phase-Locked Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation on Learning and Cognitive Control
title Effect of Theta Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Phase-Locked Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation on Learning and Cognitive Control
title_full Effect of Theta Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Phase-Locked Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation on Learning and Cognitive Control
title_fullStr Effect of Theta Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Phase-Locked Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation on Learning and Cognitive Control
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Theta Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Phase-Locked Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation on Learning and Cognitive Control
title_short Effect of Theta Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Phase-Locked Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation on Learning and Cognitive Control
title_sort effect of theta transcranial alternating current stimulation and phase-locked transcranial pulsed current stimulation on learning and cognitive control
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6867974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31798397
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01181
work_keys_str_mv AT mansourifarrokh effectofthetatranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationandphaselockedtranscranialpulsedcurrentstimulationonlearningandcognitivecontrol
AT shanbouralaa effectofthetatranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationandphaselockedtranscranialpulsedcurrentstimulationonlearningandcognitivecontrol
AT mazzafrank effectofthetatranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationandphaselockedtranscranialpulsedcurrentstimulationonlearningandcognitivecontrol
AT fettespeter effectofthetatranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationandphaselockedtranscranialpulsedcurrentstimulationonlearningandcognitivecontrol
AT zariffajose effectofthetatranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationandphaselockedtranscranialpulsedcurrentstimulationonlearningandcognitivecontrol
AT downarjonathan effectofthetatranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationandphaselockedtranscranialpulsedcurrentstimulationonlearningandcognitivecontrol