Cargando…
Binary Theorizing Does Not Account for Action Control
Everyday thinking and scientific theorizing about human action control are equally driven by the apparently obvious contrast between will and habit or, in their more modern disguise: intentional and automatic processes, and model-based and model-free action planning. And yet, no comprehensive catego...
Autor principal: | Hommel, Bernhard |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31798503 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02542 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Social Cognition 2.0: Toward Mechanistic Theorizing
por: Kim, Diana, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Corrigendum: Social Cognition 2.0: Toward Mechanistic Theorizing
por: Kim, Diana, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Songs for the Ego: Theorizing Musical Self-Enhancement
por: Elvers, Paul
Publicado: (2016) -
Dancing in the dark: no role for consciousness in action control
por: Hommel, Bernhard
Publicado: (2013) -
Interpersonal trust: an event-based account
por: Hommel, Bernhard, et al.
Publicado: (2015)