Cargando…
The potentiality of sinking EDM for micro-impressions on Ti-6Al-4V: keeping the geometrical errors (axial and radial) and other machining measures (tool erosion and work roughness) at minimum
Ti-6Al-4V is a material of high interest in various industrial sectors including biomedical, automotive and aerospace. Conventional means of machining encounter different types of difficulties. Electric discharge machining (EDM) is not a contest of hardness. Circular impressions of micro-depth are p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31748565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52855-6 |
_version_ | 1783472215168122880 |
---|---|
author | Ahmed, Naveed Anwar, Saqib Ishfaq, Kashif Rafaqat, Madiha Saleh, Mustafa Ahmad, Shafiq |
author_facet | Ahmed, Naveed Anwar, Saqib Ishfaq, Kashif Rafaqat, Madiha Saleh, Mustafa Ahmad, Shafiq |
author_sort | Ahmed, Naveed |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ti-6Al-4V is a material of high interest in various industrial sectors including biomedical, automotive and aerospace. Conventional means of machining encounter different types of difficulties. Electric discharge machining (EDM) is not a contest of hardness. Circular impressions of micro-depth are produced in Ti-6Al-4V using four different electrode materials including aluminum, brass, graphite and copper, each assigned positive and negative polarity. In order to get precise control over the geometry of micro-impressions dimensional accuracy and tool wear must be controlled. Thus, EDM performance has been evaluated in terms of axial dimensional error (D.E_Axi), radial dimensional error (D.E_Rad), tool length reduction (TLR), and surface roughness (SR). Since the EDM process is stochastic in nature therefore in addition to tool polarity only two factors are considered as variables, i.e. discharge current and pulse-time-ratio (ration of on-time to off-time). The behaviors of each of the four electrode materials are compared together under each of the two polarities and two variables for each of the four response characteristics. The search is carried out to select the most appropriate tool electrode polarity (common for all responses) and a single common electrode capable of minimizing all the four response measures simultaneously. Moreover, microstructures of the machined impressions are discussed. Without any compromise in the minimum values of response measures, no single polarity and a single electrode are found common. However, with a slight compromise over the machining measures negative tool polarity and copper electrode served the purpose of set objectives (minimum of D.E, TLR, and SR). The expanse of compromise is found to be ≤ 50 µm in axial and radial dimensional errors, 0.8 µm in surface roughness and no compromise in tool length reduction if the copper electrode is assigned with negative polarity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6868188 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68681882019-12-04 The potentiality of sinking EDM for micro-impressions on Ti-6Al-4V: keeping the geometrical errors (axial and radial) and other machining measures (tool erosion and work roughness) at minimum Ahmed, Naveed Anwar, Saqib Ishfaq, Kashif Rafaqat, Madiha Saleh, Mustafa Ahmad, Shafiq Sci Rep Article Ti-6Al-4V is a material of high interest in various industrial sectors including biomedical, automotive and aerospace. Conventional means of machining encounter different types of difficulties. Electric discharge machining (EDM) is not a contest of hardness. Circular impressions of micro-depth are produced in Ti-6Al-4V using four different electrode materials including aluminum, brass, graphite and copper, each assigned positive and negative polarity. In order to get precise control over the geometry of micro-impressions dimensional accuracy and tool wear must be controlled. Thus, EDM performance has been evaluated in terms of axial dimensional error (D.E_Axi), radial dimensional error (D.E_Rad), tool length reduction (TLR), and surface roughness (SR). Since the EDM process is stochastic in nature therefore in addition to tool polarity only two factors are considered as variables, i.e. discharge current and pulse-time-ratio (ration of on-time to off-time). The behaviors of each of the four electrode materials are compared together under each of the two polarities and two variables for each of the four response characteristics. The search is carried out to select the most appropriate tool electrode polarity (common for all responses) and a single common electrode capable of minimizing all the four response measures simultaneously. Moreover, microstructures of the machined impressions are discussed. Without any compromise in the minimum values of response measures, no single polarity and a single electrode are found common. However, with a slight compromise over the machining measures negative tool polarity and copper electrode served the purpose of set objectives (minimum of D.E, TLR, and SR). The expanse of compromise is found to be ≤ 50 µm in axial and radial dimensional errors, 0.8 µm in surface roughness and no compromise in tool length reduction if the copper electrode is assigned with negative polarity. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6868188/ /pubmed/31748565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52855-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Ahmed, Naveed Anwar, Saqib Ishfaq, Kashif Rafaqat, Madiha Saleh, Mustafa Ahmad, Shafiq The potentiality of sinking EDM for micro-impressions on Ti-6Al-4V: keeping the geometrical errors (axial and radial) and other machining measures (tool erosion and work roughness) at minimum |
title | The potentiality of sinking EDM for micro-impressions on Ti-6Al-4V: keeping the geometrical errors (axial and radial) and other machining measures (tool erosion and work roughness) at minimum |
title_full | The potentiality of sinking EDM for micro-impressions on Ti-6Al-4V: keeping the geometrical errors (axial and radial) and other machining measures (tool erosion and work roughness) at minimum |
title_fullStr | The potentiality of sinking EDM for micro-impressions on Ti-6Al-4V: keeping the geometrical errors (axial and radial) and other machining measures (tool erosion and work roughness) at minimum |
title_full_unstemmed | The potentiality of sinking EDM for micro-impressions on Ti-6Al-4V: keeping the geometrical errors (axial and radial) and other machining measures (tool erosion and work roughness) at minimum |
title_short | The potentiality of sinking EDM for micro-impressions on Ti-6Al-4V: keeping the geometrical errors (axial and radial) and other machining measures (tool erosion and work roughness) at minimum |
title_sort | potentiality of sinking edm for micro-impressions on ti-6al-4v: keeping the geometrical errors (axial and radial) and other machining measures (tool erosion and work roughness) at minimum |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31748565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52855-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmednaveed thepotentialityofsinkingedmformicroimpressionsonti6al4vkeepingthegeometricalerrorsaxialandradialandothermachiningmeasurestoolerosionandworkroughnessatminimum AT anwarsaqib thepotentialityofsinkingedmformicroimpressionsonti6al4vkeepingthegeometricalerrorsaxialandradialandothermachiningmeasurestoolerosionandworkroughnessatminimum AT ishfaqkashif thepotentialityofsinkingedmformicroimpressionsonti6al4vkeepingthegeometricalerrorsaxialandradialandothermachiningmeasurestoolerosionandworkroughnessatminimum AT rafaqatmadiha thepotentialityofsinkingedmformicroimpressionsonti6al4vkeepingthegeometricalerrorsaxialandradialandothermachiningmeasurestoolerosionandworkroughnessatminimum AT salehmustafa thepotentialityofsinkingedmformicroimpressionsonti6al4vkeepingthegeometricalerrorsaxialandradialandothermachiningmeasurestoolerosionandworkroughnessatminimum AT ahmadshafiq thepotentialityofsinkingedmformicroimpressionsonti6al4vkeepingthegeometricalerrorsaxialandradialandothermachiningmeasurestoolerosionandworkroughnessatminimum AT ahmednaveed potentialityofsinkingedmformicroimpressionsonti6al4vkeepingthegeometricalerrorsaxialandradialandothermachiningmeasurestoolerosionandworkroughnessatminimum AT anwarsaqib potentialityofsinkingedmformicroimpressionsonti6al4vkeepingthegeometricalerrorsaxialandradialandothermachiningmeasurestoolerosionandworkroughnessatminimum AT ishfaqkashif potentialityofsinkingedmformicroimpressionsonti6al4vkeepingthegeometricalerrorsaxialandradialandothermachiningmeasurestoolerosionandworkroughnessatminimum AT rafaqatmadiha potentialityofsinkingedmformicroimpressionsonti6al4vkeepingthegeometricalerrorsaxialandradialandothermachiningmeasurestoolerosionandworkroughnessatminimum AT salehmustafa potentialityofsinkingedmformicroimpressionsonti6al4vkeepingthegeometricalerrorsaxialandradialandothermachiningmeasurestoolerosionandworkroughnessatminimum AT ahmadshafiq potentialityofsinkingedmformicroimpressionsonti6al4vkeepingthegeometricalerrorsaxialandradialandothermachiningmeasurestoolerosionandworkroughnessatminimum |