Cargando…

Seasonal variability does not impact in vitro fertilization success

It is unknown whether seasonal variation influences the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Previous studies related to seasonal variation of IVF were all small sample size, and the results were conflicting. We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating the relationship between seasonal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xitong, Bai, Haiyan, Mol, Ben W., Shi, Wenhao, Gao, Ming, Shi, Juanzi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31748683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53919-3
_version_ 1783472236628279296
author Liu, Xitong
Bai, Haiyan
Mol, Ben W.
Shi, Wenhao
Gao, Ming
Shi, Juanzi
author_facet Liu, Xitong
Bai, Haiyan
Mol, Ben W.
Shi, Wenhao
Gao, Ming
Shi, Juanzi
author_sort Liu, Xitong
collection PubMed
description It is unknown whether seasonal variation influences the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Previous studies related to seasonal variation of IVF were all small sample size, and the results were conflicting. We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating the relationship between seasonal variability and live birth rate in the year of 2014–2017. Patients were grouped into four seasons (Winter (December-February), Spring (March-May), Summer (June-August), and Autumn (September-November)) according to the day of oocyte pick-up (OPU). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate association between seasonal variation and live birth. Models were adjusted for covariates including temperature, sunshine hour, infertility type, infertility duration, infertility factor and BMI. In total 38,476 women were enrolled, of which 25,097 underwent fresh cycles, 13,379 were frozen embryo transfer. Live birth rates of fresh embryo transfer were 50.36%, 53.14%, 51.94% and 51.33% for spring, summer, autumn and winter, respectively. Clinical pregnancy rate between the calendar months varied between 55.1% and 63.4% in fresh embryo transfer (ET) and between 58.8% and 65.1% in frozen embryo transfer (FET) (P-values 0.073 and 0.220). In the unadjusted model and adjust model, seasonal variation was not associated with live birth. In conclusion, there was no significant difference of seasonal variations in the outcome of IVF with fresh embryo transfer and frozen embryo transfer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6868277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68682772019-12-04 Seasonal variability does not impact in vitro fertilization success Liu, Xitong Bai, Haiyan Mol, Ben W. Shi, Wenhao Gao, Ming Shi, Juanzi Sci Rep Article It is unknown whether seasonal variation influences the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Previous studies related to seasonal variation of IVF were all small sample size, and the results were conflicting. We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating the relationship between seasonal variability and live birth rate in the year of 2014–2017. Patients were grouped into four seasons (Winter (December-February), Spring (March-May), Summer (June-August), and Autumn (September-November)) according to the day of oocyte pick-up (OPU). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate association between seasonal variation and live birth. Models were adjusted for covariates including temperature, sunshine hour, infertility type, infertility duration, infertility factor and BMI. In total 38,476 women were enrolled, of which 25,097 underwent fresh cycles, 13,379 were frozen embryo transfer. Live birth rates of fresh embryo transfer were 50.36%, 53.14%, 51.94% and 51.33% for spring, summer, autumn and winter, respectively. Clinical pregnancy rate between the calendar months varied between 55.1% and 63.4% in fresh embryo transfer (ET) and between 58.8% and 65.1% in frozen embryo transfer (FET) (P-values 0.073 and 0.220). In the unadjusted model and adjust model, seasonal variation was not associated with live birth. In conclusion, there was no significant difference of seasonal variations in the outcome of IVF with fresh embryo transfer and frozen embryo transfer. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6868277/ /pubmed/31748683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53919-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Xitong
Bai, Haiyan
Mol, Ben W.
Shi, Wenhao
Gao, Ming
Shi, Juanzi
Seasonal variability does not impact in vitro fertilization success
title Seasonal variability does not impact in vitro fertilization success
title_full Seasonal variability does not impact in vitro fertilization success
title_fullStr Seasonal variability does not impact in vitro fertilization success
title_full_unstemmed Seasonal variability does not impact in vitro fertilization success
title_short Seasonal variability does not impact in vitro fertilization success
title_sort seasonal variability does not impact in vitro fertilization success
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31748683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53919-3
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxitong seasonalvariabilitydoesnotimpactinvitrofertilizationsuccess
AT baihaiyan seasonalvariabilitydoesnotimpactinvitrofertilizationsuccess
AT molbenw seasonalvariabilitydoesnotimpactinvitrofertilizationsuccess
AT shiwenhao seasonalvariabilitydoesnotimpactinvitrofertilizationsuccess
AT gaoming seasonalvariabilitydoesnotimpactinvitrofertilizationsuccess
AT shijuanzi seasonalvariabilitydoesnotimpactinvitrofertilizationsuccess