Cargando…
Global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. What is “Abnormal” in the upper cervical spine?
HYPOTHESIS: Reciprocal changes in the upper cervical spine correlate with adult TL deformity modifiers. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review. INTRODUCTION: The upper cervical spine has remarkable adaptability to wide ranges of thoracolumbar (TL) deformity. METHODS: Patients >18 years with adul...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31772427 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_71_19 |
_version_ | 1783472286835146752 |
---|---|
author | Passias, Peter G Alas, Haddy Lafage, Renaud Diebo, Bassel G Chern, Irene Ames, Christopher P Park, Paul Than, Khoi D Daniels, Alan H Hamilton, D Kojo Burton, Douglas C Hart, Robert A Bess, Shay Line, Breton G Klineberg, Eric O Shaffrey, Christopher I Smith, Justin S Schwab, Frank J Lafage, Virginie |
author_facet | Passias, Peter G Alas, Haddy Lafage, Renaud Diebo, Bassel G Chern, Irene Ames, Christopher P Park, Paul Than, Khoi D Daniels, Alan H Hamilton, D Kojo Burton, Douglas C Hart, Robert A Bess, Shay Line, Breton G Klineberg, Eric O Shaffrey, Christopher I Smith, Justin S Schwab, Frank J Lafage, Virginie |
author_sort | Passias, Peter G |
collection | PubMed |
description | HYPOTHESIS: Reciprocal changes in the upper cervical spine correlate with adult TL deformity modifiers. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review. INTRODUCTION: The upper cervical spine has remarkable adaptability to wide ranges of thoracolumbar (TL) deformity. METHODS: Patients >18 years with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and complete radiographic data at baseline (BL) and 1 year were identified. Patients were grouped into component types of the Roussouly classification system (Type 1: Pelvic incidence [PI] <45° and lumbar lordosis [LL] apex below L4; Type 2: PI <45° and LL apex above L4; Type 3:45°<PI <65°; and Type 4: PI >65°). Patients were categorized by increasing severity of Schwab modifiers at BL (0, +, and ++) and further grouped by regional malalignment moving cranially (P: pelvic only; LP: lumbopelvic; TL: thoracic and LP; C: subaxial and TL). Analysis of variance and Pearson's r assessed changes in BL upper cervical parameters (C0-2, C0 slope, McGregor's Slope [MGS], and CBVA) across groups. RESULTS: A total of 343 ASD patients were analyzed. When grouped by BL Schwab and Roussouly, Group P had the lowest BL disability compared to other Groups, while Roussouley Type 1 correlated with higher BL disability compared to Type 2. Moving cranially up the spine, Group P, Group LP, and Group TL did not differ in C0-2 angle, C0 slope, MGS, or CBVA. Group C had a significantly smaller C0-C2, and more negative MGS, C0 slope, and CBVA than noncervical groups. Type 1 trended slightly higher CBVA and MGS than types 2–4, but no differences in cervical lordosis, C0-C2, or C0S were found. MGS (r = −0.131, P = 0.015), CBVA (r = −0.473, P < 0.001), and C0S (r = −0.099, P = 0.042) correlated most strongly with sagittal vertical axis (SVA) compared to other Schwab modifiers. We found SVA > 34 mm predicted a 1 unit (°°) decrease in MGS (odds ratio [OR]: 0.970 [0.948–0.993], P = 0.010), while cervical SVA >51 mm predicted a 1 unit increase in MGS (OR: 1.25 [1.12–1.38], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that upper cervical alignment remains relatively stable through most broad variations of adult TL deformity. Changes in SVA correlated most with upper cervical changes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6868544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68685442019-11-26 Global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. What is “Abnormal” in the upper cervical spine? Passias, Peter G Alas, Haddy Lafage, Renaud Diebo, Bassel G Chern, Irene Ames, Christopher P Park, Paul Than, Khoi D Daniels, Alan H Hamilton, D Kojo Burton, Douglas C Hart, Robert A Bess, Shay Line, Breton G Klineberg, Eric O Shaffrey, Christopher I Smith, Justin S Schwab, Frank J Lafage, Virginie J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article HYPOTHESIS: Reciprocal changes in the upper cervical spine correlate with adult TL deformity modifiers. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review. INTRODUCTION: The upper cervical spine has remarkable adaptability to wide ranges of thoracolumbar (TL) deformity. METHODS: Patients >18 years with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and complete radiographic data at baseline (BL) and 1 year were identified. Patients were grouped into component types of the Roussouly classification system (Type 1: Pelvic incidence [PI] <45° and lumbar lordosis [LL] apex below L4; Type 2: PI <45° and LL apex above L4; Type 3:45°<PI <65°; and Type 4: PI >65°). Patients were categorized by increasing severity of Schwab modifiers at BL (0, +, and ++) and further grouped by regional malalignment moving cranially (P: pelvic only; LP: lumbopelvic; TL: thoracic and LP; C: subaxial and TL). Analysis of variance and Pearson's r assessed changes in BL upper cervical parameters (C0-2, C0 slope, McGregor's Slope [MGS], and CBVA) across groups. RESULTS: A total of 343 ASD patients were analyzed. When grouped by BL Schwab and Roussouly, Group P had the lowest BL disability compared to other Groups, while Roussouley Type 1 correlated with higher BL disability compared to Type 2. Moving cranially up the spine, Group P, Group LP, and Group TL did not differ in C0-2 angle, C0 slope, MGS, or CBVA. Group C had a significantly smaller C0-C2, and more negative MGS, C0 slope, and CBVA than noncervical groups. Type 1 trended slightly higher CBVA and MGS than types 2–4, but no differences in cervical lordosis, C0-C2, or C0S were found. MGS (r = −0.131, P = 0.015), CBVA (r = −0.473, P < 0.001), and C0S (r = −0.099, P = 0.042) correlated most strongly with sagittal vertical axis (SVA) compared to other Schwab modifiers. We found SVA > 34 mm predicted a 1 unit (°°) decrease in MGS (odds ratio [OR]: 0.970 [0.948–0.993], P = 0.010), while cervical SVA >51 mm predicted a 1 unit increase in MGS (OR: 1.25 [1.12–1.38], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that upper cervical alignment remains relatively stable through most broad variations of adult TL deformity. Changes in SVA correlated most with upper cervical changes. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6868544/ /pubmed/31772427 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_71_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Passias, Peter G Alas, Haddy Lafage, Renaud Diebo, Bassel G Chern, Irene Ames, Christopher P Park, Paul Than, Khoi D Daniels, Alan H Hamilton, D Kojo Burton, Douglas C Hart, Robert A Bess, Shay Line, Breton G Klineberg, Eric O Shaffrey, Christopher I Smith, Justin S Schwab, Frank J Lafage, Virginie Global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. What is “Abnormal” in the upper cervical spine? |
title | Global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. What is “Abnormal” in the upper cervical spine? |
title_full | Global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. What is “Abnormal” in the upper cervical spine? |
title_fullStr | Global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. What is “Abnormal” in the upper cervical spine? |
title_full_unstemmed | Global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. What is “Abnormal” in the upper cervical spine? |
title_short | Global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. What is “Abnormal” in the upper cervical spine? |
title_sort | global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. what is “abnormal” in the upper cervical spine? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31772427 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_71_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT passiaspeterg globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine AT alashaddy globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine AT lafagerenaud globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine AT diebobasselg globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine AT chernirene globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine AT ameschristopherp globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine AT parkpaul globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine AT thankhoid globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine AT danielsalanh globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine AT hamiltondkojo globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine AT burtondouglasc globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine AT hartroberta globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine AT bessshay globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine AT linebretong globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine AT klinebergerico globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine AT shaffreychristopheri globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine AT smithjustins globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine AT schwabfrankj globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine AT lafagevirginie globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine |