Cargando…

Global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. What is “Abnormal” in the upper cervical spine?

HYPOTHESIS: Reciprocal changes in the upper cervical spine correlate with adult TL deformity modifiers. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review. INTRODUCTION: The upper cervical spine has remarkable adaptability to wide ranges of thoracolumbar (TL) deformity. METHODS: Patients >18 years with adul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Passias, Peter G, Alas, Haddy, Lafage, Renaud, Diebo, Bassel G, Chern, Irene, Ames, Christopher P, Park, Paul, Than, Khoi D, Daniels, Alan H, Hamilton, D Kojo, Burton, Douglas C, Hart, Robert A, Bess, Shay, Line, Breton G, Klineberg, Eric O, Shaffrey, Christopher I, Smith, Justin S, Schwab, Frank J, Lafage, Virginie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31772427
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_71_19
_version_ 1783472286835146752
author Passias, Peter G
Alas, Haddy
Lafage, Renaud
Diebo, Bassel G
Chern, Irene
Ames, Christopher P
Park, Paul
Than, Khoi D
Daniels, Alan H
Hamilton, D Kojo
Burton, Douglas C
Hart, Robert A
Bess, Shay
Line, Breton G
Klineberg, Eric O
Shaffrey, Christopher I
Smith, Justin S
Schwab, Frank J
Lafage, Virginie
author_facet Passias, Peter G
Alas, Haddy
Lafage, Renaud
Diebo, Bassel G
Chern, Irene
Ames, Christopher P
Park, Paul
Than, Khoi D
Daniels, Alan H
Hamilton, D Kojo
Burton, Douglas C
Hart, Robert A
Bess, Shay
Line, Breton G
Klineberg, Eric O
Shaffrey, Christopher I
Smith, Justin S
Schwab, Frank J
Lafage, Virginie
author_sort Passias, Peter G
collection PubMed
description HYPOTHESIS: Reciprocal changes in the upper cervical spine correlate with adult TL deformity modifiers. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review. INTRODUCTION: The upper cervical spine has remarkable adaptability to wide ranges of thoracolumbar (TL) deformity. METHODS: Patients >18 years with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and complete radiographic data at baseline (BL) and 1 year were identified. Patients were grouped into component types of the Roussouly classification system (Type 1: Pelvic incidence [PI] <45° and lumbar lordosis [LL] apex below L4; Type 2: PI <45° and LL apex above L4; Type 3:45°<PI <65°; and Type 4: PI >65°). Patients were categorized by increasing severity of Schwab modifiers at BL (0, +, and ++) and further grouped by regional malalignment moving cranially (P: pelvic only; LP: lumbopelvic; TL: thoracic and LP; C: subaxial and TL). Analysis of variance and Pearson's r assessed changes in BL upper cervical parameters (C0-2, C0 slope, McGregor's Slope [MGS], and CBVA) across groups. RESULTS: A total of 343 ASD patients were analyzed. When grouped by BL Schwab and Roussouly, Group P had the lowest BL disability compared to other Groups, while Roussouley Type 1 correlated with higher BL disability compared to Type 2. Moving cranially up the spine, Group P, Group LP, and Group TL did not differ in C0-2 angle, C0 slope, MGS, or CBVA. Group C had a significantly smaller C0-C2, and more negative MGS, C0 slope, and CBVA than noncervical groups. Type 1 trended slightly higher CBVA and MGS than types 2–4, but no differences in cervical lordosis, C0-C2, or C0S were found. MGS (r = −0.131, P = 0.015), CBVA (r = −0.473, P < 0.001), and C0S (r = −0.099, P = 0.042) correlated most strongly with sagittal vertical axis (SVA) compared to other Schwab modifiers. We found SVA > 34 mm predicted a 1 unit (°°) decrease in MGS (odds ratio [OR]: 0.970 [0.948–0.993], P = 0.010), while cervical SVA >51 mm predicted a 1 unit increase in MGS (OR: 1.25 [1.12–1.38], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that upper cervical alignment remains relatively stable through most broad variations of adult TL deformity. Changes in SVA correlated most with upper cervical changes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6868544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68685442019-11-26 Global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. What is “Abnormal” in the upper cervical spine? Passias, Peter G Alas, Haddy Lafage, Renaud Diebo, Bassel G Chern, Irene Ames, Christopher P Park, Paul Than, Khoi D Daniels, Alan H Hamilton, D Kojo Burton, Douglas C Hart, Robert A Bess, Shay Line, Breton G Klineberg, Eric O Shaffrey, Christopher I Smith, Justin S Schwab, Frank J Lafage, Virginie J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article HYPOTHESIS: Reciprocal changes in the upper cervical spine correlate with adult TL deformity modifiers. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review. INTRODUCTION: The upper cervical spine has remarkable adaptability to wide ranges of thoracolumbar (TL) deformity. METHODS: Patients >18 years with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and complete radiographic data at baseline (BL) and 1 year were identified. Patients were grouped into component types of the Roussouly classification system (Type 1: Pelvic incidence [PI] <45° and lumbar lordosis [LL] apex below L4; Type 2: PI <45° and LL apex above L4; Type 3:45°<PI <65°; and Type 4: PI >65°). Patients were categorized by increasing severity of Schwab modifiers at BL (0, +, and ++) and further grouped by regional malalignment moving cranially (P: pelvic only; LP: lumbopelvic; TL: thoracic and LP; C: subaxial and TL). Analysis of variance and Pearson's r assessed changes in BL upper cervical parameters (C0-2, C0 slope, McGregor's Slope [MGS], and CBVA) across groups. RESULTS: A total of 343 ASD patients were analyzed. When grouped by BL Schwab and Roussouly, Group P had the lowest BL disability compared to other Groups, while Roussouley Type 1 correlated with higher BL disability compared to Type 2. Moving cranially up the spine, Group P, Group LP, and Group TL did not differ in C0-2 angle, C0 slope, MGS, or CBVA. Group C had a significantly smaller C0-C2, and more negative MGS, C0 slope, and CBVA than noncervical groups. Type 1 trended slightly higher CBVA and MGS than types 2–4, but no differences in cervical lordosis, C0-C2, or C0S were found. MGS (r = −0.131, P = 0.015), CBVA (r = −0.473, P < 0.001), and C0S (r = −0.099, P = 0.042) correlated most strongly with sagittal vertical axis (SVA) compared to other Schwab modifiers. We found SVA > 34 mm predicted a 1 unit (°°) decrease in MGS (odds ratio [OR]: 0.970 [0.948–0.993], P = 0.010), while cervical SVA >51 mm predicted a 1 unit increase in MGS (OR: 1.25 [1.12–1.38], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that upper cervical alignment remains relatively stable through most broad variations of adult TL deformity. Changes in SVA correlated most with upper cervical changes. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6868544/ /pubmed/31772427 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_71_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Passias, Peter G
Alas, Haddy
Lafage, Renaud
Diebo, Bassel G
Chern, Irene
Ames, Christopher P
Park, Paul
Than, Khoi D
Daniels, Alan H
Hamilton, D Kojo
Burton, Douglas C
Hart, Robert A
Bess, Shay
Line, Breton G
Klineberg, Eric O
Shaffrey, Christopher I
Smith, Justin S
Schwab, Frank J
Lafage, Virginie
Global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. What is “Abnormal” in the upper cervical spine?
title Global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. What is “Abnormal” in the upper cervical spine?
title_full Global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. What is “Abnormal” in the upper cervical spine?
title_fullStr Global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. What is “Abnormal” in the upper cervical spine?
title_full_unstemmed Global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. What is “Abnormal” in the upper cervical spine?
title_short Global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. What is “Abnormal” in the upper cervical spine?
title_sort global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. what is “abnormal” in the upper cervical spine?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31772427
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_71_19
work_keys_str_mv AT passiaspeterg globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine
AT alashaddy globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine
AT lafagerenaud globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine
AT diebobasselg globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine
AT chernirene globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine
AT ameschristopherp globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine
AT parkpaul globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine
AT thankhoid globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine
AT danielsalanh globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine
AT hamiltondkojo globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine
AT burtondouglasc globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine
AT hartroberta globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine
AT bessshay globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine
AT linebretong globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine
AT klinebergerico globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine
AT shaffreychristopheri globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine
AT smithjustins globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine
AT schwabfrankj globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine
AT lafagevirginie globalspinaldeformityfromtheuppercervicalperspectivewhatisabnormalintheuppercervicalspine