Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions with Coronally Advanced Flap Using Microsurgical and Conventional Techniques

BACKGROUND: Coverage of gingival recession is a very precision-oriented procedure. Employment of operating microscope has proved to be a boon in various surgical procedures and therefore can have positive benefits on the outcome of a procedure. AIM: The aim of this study is to find out whether the u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Chandni, Mehta, Rupal, Joshi, Surabhi, Hirani, Tanvi, Joshi, Chintan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31772473
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_571_18
_version_ 1783472305088757760
author Patel, Chandni
Mehta, Rupal
Joshi, Surabhi
Hirani, Tanvi
Joshi, Chintan
author_facet Patel, Chandni
Mehta, Rupal
Joshi, Surabhi
Hirani, Tanvi
Joshi, Chintan
author_sort Patel, Chandni
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coverage of gingival recession is a very precision-oriented procedure. Employment of operating microscope has proved to be a boon in various surgical procedures and therefore can have positive benefits on the outcome of a procedure. AIM: The aim of this study is to find out whether the use of an operating microscope in the surgical treatment of Millers Class I and Class II gingival recession defects could improve the outcome in terms of root coverage and final tissue appearance compared to those done by the conventional technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This clinical study was carried out on ten patients with the presence of bilateral isolated gingival recession classified as Miller's Class I or Class II recession defect. The split-mouth design was used where coronally advanced flap with the placement of platelet-rich fibrin was done in defects in test (microsurgical) and control (conventional) groups. Various clinical parameters were recorded at baseline and then postoperatively at 3-months and 6-month intervals. RESULTS: The visual analog scale scores showed a statistically significant difference between scores while all other parameters had no statistically significant difference in intergroup comparison after 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSION: While microscope permitted less traumatic and minimally invasive procedure, both groups showed convincing improvement in clinical parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6868622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68686222019-11-26 Comparative Evaluation of Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions with Coronally Advanced Flap Using Microsurgical and Conventional Techniques Patel, Chandni Mehta, Rupal Joshi, Surabhi Hirani, Tanvi Joshi, Chintan Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: Coverage of gingival recession is a very precision-oriented procedure. Employment of operating microscope has proved to be a boon in various surgical procedures and therefore can have positive benefits on the outcome of a procedure. AIM: The aim of this study is to find out whether the use of an operating microscope in the surgical treatment of Millers Class I and Class II gingival recession defects could improve the outcome in terms of root coverage and final tissue appearance compared to those done by the conventional technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This clinical study was carried out on ten patients with the presence of bilateral isolated gingival recession classified as Miller's Class I or Class II recession defect. The split-mouth design was used where coronally advanced flap with the placement of platelet-rich fibrin was done in defects in test (microsurgical) and control (conventional) groups. Various clinical parameters were recorded at baseline and then postoperatively at 3-months and 6-month intervals. RESULTS: The visual analog scale scores showed a statistically significant difference between scores while all other parameters had no statistically significant difference in intergroup comparison after 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSION: While microscope permitted less traumatic and minimally invasive procedure, both groups showed convincing improvement in clinical parameters. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6868622/ /pubmed/31772473 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_571_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Patel, Chandni
Mehta, Rupal
Joshi, Surabhi
Hirani, Tanvi
Joshi, Chintan
Comparative Evaluation of Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions with Coronally Advanced Flap Using Microsurgical and Conventional Techniques
title Comparative Evaluation of Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions with Coronally Advanced Flap Using Microsurgical and Conventional Techniques
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions with Coronally Advanced Flap Using Microsurgical and Conventional Techniques
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions with Coronally Advanced Flap Using Microsurgical and Conventional Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions with Coronally Advanced Flap Using Microsurgical and Conventional Techniques
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions with Coronally Advanced Flap Using Microsurgical and Conventional Techniques
title_sort comparative evaluation of treatment of localized gingival recessions with coronally advanced flap using microsurgical and conventional techniques
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31772473
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_571_18
work_keys_str_mv AT patelchandni comparativeevaluationoftreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionswithcoronallyadvancedflapusingmicrosurgicalandconventionaltechniques
AT mehtarupal comparativeevaluationoftreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionswithcoronallyadvancedflapusingmicrosurgicalandconventionaltechniques
AT joshisurabhi comparativeevaluationoftreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionswithcoronallyadvancedflapusingmicrosurgicalandconventionaltechniques
AT hiranitanvi comparativeevaluationoftreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionswithcoronallyadvancedflapusingmicrosurgicalandconventionaltechniques
AT joshichintan comparativeevaluationoftreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionswithcoronallyadvancedflapusingmicrosurgicalandconventionaltechniques