Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions with Coronally Advanced Flap Using Microsurgical and Conventional Techniques
BACKGROUND: Coverage of gingival recession is a very precision-oriented procedure. Employment of operating microscope has proved to be a boon in various surgical procedures and therefore can have positive benefits on the outcome of a procedure. AIM: The aim of this study is to find out whether the u...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31772473 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_571_18 |
_version_ | 1783472305088757760 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Chandni Mehta, Rupal Joshi, Surabhi Hirani, Tanvi Joshi, Chintan |
author_facet | Patel, Chandni Mehta, Rupal Joshi, Surabhi Hirani, Tanvi Joshi, Chintan |
author_sort | Patel, Chandni |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Coverage of gingival recession is a very precision-oriented procedure. Employment of operating microscope has proved to be a boon in various surgical procedures and therefore can have positive benefits on the outcome of a procedure. AIM: The aim of this study is to find out whether the use of an operating microscope in the surgical treatment of Millers Class I and Class II gingival recession defects could improve the outcome in terms of root coverage and final tissue appearance compared to those done by the conventional technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This clinical study was carried out on ten patients with the presence of bilateral isolated gingival recession classified as Miller's Class I or Class II recession defect. The split-mouth design was used where coronally advanced flap with the placement of platelet-rich fibrin was done in defects in test (microsurgical) and control (conventional) groups. Various clinical parameters were recorded at baseline and then postoperatively at 3-months and 6-month intervals. RESULTS: The visual analog scale scores showed a statistically significant difference between scores while all other parameters had no statistically significant difference in intergroup comparison after 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSION: While microscope permitted less traumatic and minimally invasive procedure, both groups showed convincing improvement in clinical parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6868622 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68686222019-11-26 Comparative Evaluation of Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions with Coronally Advanced Flap Using Microsurgical and Conventional Techniques Patel, Chandni Mehta, Rupal Joshi, Surabhi Hirani, Tanvi Joshi, Chintan Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: Coverage of gingival recession is a very precision-oriented procedure. Employment of operating microscope has proved to be a boon in various surgical procedures and therefore can have positive benefits on the outcome of a procedure. AIM: The aim of this study is to find out whether the use of an operating microscope in the surgical treatment of Millers Class I and Class II gingival recession defects could improve the outcome in terms of root coverage and final tissue appearance compared to those done by the conventional technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This clinical study was carried out on ten patients with the presence of bilateral isolated gingival recession classified as Miller's Class I or Class II recession defect. The split-mouth design was used where coronally advanced flap with the placement of platelet-rich fibrin was done in defects in test (microsurgical) and control (conventional) groups. Various clinical parameters were recorded at baseline and then postoperatively at 3-months and 6-month intervals. RESULTS: The visual analog scale scores showed a statistically significant difference between scores while all other parameters had no statistically significant difference in intergroup comparison after 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSION: While microscope permitted less traumatic and minimally invasive procedure, both groups showed convincing improvement in clinical parameters. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6868622/ /pubmed/31772473 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_571_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Patel, Chandni Mehta, Rupal Joshi, Surabhi Hirani, Tanvi Joshi, Chintan Comparative Evaluation of Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions with Coronally Advanced Flap Using Microsurgical and Conventional Techniques |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions with Coronally Advanced Flap Using Microsurgical and Conventional Techniques |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions with Coronally Advanced Flap Using Microsurgical and Conventional Techniques |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions with Coronally Advanced Flap Using Microsurgical and Conventional Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions with Coronally Advanced Flap Using Microsurgical and Conventional Techniques |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions with Coronally Advanced Flap Using Microsurgical and Conventional Techniques |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of treatment of localized gingival recessions with coronally advanced flap using microsurgical and conventional techniques |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31772473 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_571_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelchandni comparativeevaluationoftreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionswithcoronallyadvancedflapusingmicrosurgicalandconventionaltechniques AT mehtarupal comparativeevaluationoftreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionswithcoronallyadvancedflapusingmicrosurgicalandconventionaltechniques AT joshisurabhi comparativeevaluationoftreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionswithcoronallyadvancedflapusingmicrosurgicalandconventionaltechniques AT hiranitanvi comparativeevaluationoftreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionswithcoronallyadvancedflapusingmicrosurgicalandconventionaltechniques AT joshichintan comparativeevaluationoftreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionswithcoronallyadvancedflapusingmicrosurgicalandconventionaltechniques |