Cargando…
A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage among Newer Composite Materials: An in vitro Study
BACKGROUND: Good adhesive bonding of restorative materials to cavity walls minimizing microleakage is an important criterion for the performance and longevity of a restoration in the oral cavity. The present study is aimed to compare the microleakage among newer composite materials. MATERIALS AND ME...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31772468 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_621_18 |
_version_ | 1783472307219464192 |
---|---|
author | Sudhapalli, Sruthi Keerthi Sudhapalli, Swathi Razdan, Rahul Anand Singh, Virendra Bhasin, Abhilasha |
author_facet | Sudhapalli, Sruthi Keerthi Sudhapalli, Swathi Razdan, Rahul Anand Singh, Virendra Bhasin, Abhilasha |
author_sort | Sudhapalli, Sruthi Keerthi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Good adhesive bonding of restorative materials to cavity walls minimizing microleakage is an important criterion for the performance and longevity of a restoration in the oral cavity. The present study is aimed to compare the microleakage among newer composite materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five extracted healthy premolars were collected; standard Class II cavities were prepared. They were randomly divided into three groups of 15 teeth each. The groups were made based on the different composite restorative materials used for restoration. Group A consisted of conventional microfilled composite resin restorations, and Group B was posterior nanocomposite resin. Group C was restored using ORMOCER – Admira. After completion of restorations, all teeth were subjected to thermocycling at 5° C, 37° C, and 55° C for 250 cycles. Later, all samples were immersed into 50% silver nitrate dye group wise for for 4 hours (h), and teeth were sectioned buccolingually. Sectioned teeth were observed under a stereomicroscope for the evaluation of microleakage. ANOVA and unpaired t-tests were used for statistical analysis. The significance level was at set P < 0.001. RESULTS: The results of this study showed that Group C (ORMOCER – Admira) presented with the least microleakage followed by Group B (Tetric N-Ceram) followed by Group A (Tetric Ceram). CONCLUSIONS: Overall ORMOCER – Admira performed better than the other two composite materials with the least microleakage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6868631 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68686312019-11-26 A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage among Newer Composite Materials: An in vitro Study Sudhapalli, Sruthi Keerthi Sudhapalli, Swathi Razdan, Rahul Anand Singh, Virendra Bhasin, Abhilasha Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: Good adhesive bonding of restorative materials to cavity walls minimizing microleakage is an important criterion for the performance and longevity of a restoration in the oral cavity. The present study is aimed to compare the microleakage among newer composite materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five extracted healthy premolars were collected; standard Class II cavities were prepared. They were randomly divided into three groups of 15 teeth each. The groups were made based on the different composite restorative materials used for restoration. Group A consisted of conventional microfilled composite resin restorations, and Group B was posterior nanocomposite resin. Group C was restored using ORMOCER – Admira. After completion of restorations, all teeth were subjected to thermocycling at 5° C, 37° C, and 55° C for 250 cycles. Later, all samples were immersed into 50% silver nitrate dye group wise for for 4 hours (h), and teeth were sectioned buccolingually. Sectioned teeth were observed under a stereomicroscope for the evaluation of microleakage. ANOVA and unpaired t-tests were used for statistical analysis. The significance level was at set P < 0.001. RESULTS: The results of this study showed that Group C (ORMOCER – Admira) presented with the least microleakage followed by Group B (Tetric N-Ceram) followed by Group A (Tetric Ceram). CONCLUSIONS: Overall ORMOCER – Admira performed better than the other two composite materials with the least microleakage. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6868631/ /pubmed/31772468 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_621_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sudhapalli, Sruthi Keerthi Sudhapalli, Swathi Razdan, Rahul Anand Singh, Virendra Bhasin, Abhilasha A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage among Newer Composite Materials: An in vitro Study |
title | A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage among Newer Composite Materials: An in vitro Study |
title_full | A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage among Newer Composite Materials: An in vitro Study |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage among Newer Composite Materials: An in vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage among Newer Composite Materials: An in vitro Study |
title_short | A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage among Newer Composite Materials: An in vitro Study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of microleakage among newer composite materials: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31772468 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_621_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sudhapallisruthikeerthi acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakageamongnewercompositematerialsaninvitrostudy AT sudhapalliswathi acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakageamongnewercompositematerialsaninvitrostudy AT razdanrahulanand acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakageamongnewercompositematerialsaninvitrostudy AT singhvirendra acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakageamongnewercompositematerialsaninvitrostudy AT bhasinabhilasha acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakageamongnewercompositematerialsaninvitrostudy AT sudhapallisruthikeerthi comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageamongnewercompositematerialsaninvitrostudy AT sudhapalliswathi comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageamongnewercompositematerialsaninvitrostudy AT razdanrahulanand comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageamongnewercompositematerialsaninvitrostudy AT singhvirendra comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageamongnewercompositematerialsaninvitrostudy AT bhasinabhilasha comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageamongnewercompositematerialsaninvitrostudy |