Cargando…

In silico comparison of the dosimetric impacts of a greater omentum spacer for abdominal and pelvic tumors in carbon-ion, proton and photon radiotherapy

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare carbon-ion (C-ion), proton and photon radiotherapy (RT) plans with regard to dose reduction of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract by using a greater omentum spacer (GO spacer). METHODS: We retrospectively retrieved data for ten patients who received the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamada, Masayoshi, Sato, Hiraku, Ieko, Yoshiro, Miyasaka, Yuya, Kanai, Takayuki, Yano, Natsuko, Ono, Takashi, Akamatsu, Hiroko, Harada, Mayumi, Ichikawa, Mayumi, Teranishi, Yasushi, Kikuchi, Yasuhiro, Nemoto, Kenji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31752932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1411-0
_version_ 1783472326830981120
author Yamada, Masayoshi
Sato, Hiraku
Ieko, Yoshiro
Miyasaka, Yuya
Kanai, Takayuki
Yano, Natsuko
Ono, Takashi
Akamatsu, Hiroko
Harada, Mayumi
Ichikawa, Mayumi
Teranishi, Yasushi
Kikuchi, Yasuhiro
Nemoto, Kenji
author_facet Yamada, Masayoshi
Sato, Hiraku
Ieko, Yoshiro
Miyasaka, Yuya
Kanai, Takayuki
Yano, Natsuko
Ono, Takashi
Akamatsu, Hiroko
Harada, Mayumi
Ichikawa, Mayumi
Teranishi, Yasushi
Kikuchi, Yasuhiro
Nemoto, Kenji
author_sort Yamada, Masayoshi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare carbon-ion (C-ion), proton and photon radiotherapy (RT) plans with regard to dose reduction of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract by using a greater omentum spacer (GO spacer). METHODS: We retrospectively retrieved data for ten patients who received the GO spacer as surgical spacer placement for abdominal and pelvic tumors. Simulation plans were created on pre-spacer Computed Tomography (CT) and post-spacer CT for C-ion RT, proton RT and photon RT to compare the dose of the GI tract. The plans were normalized so that at least 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) received 70 Gy (relative biological effectiveness equivalent) delivered in 35 fractions. All plans were created with the lowest possible dose to the GI tract under conditions that meet the dose constraints for the PTV and spinal cord (maximum dose < 45 Gy). The part of the GI tract to be evaluated was defined as that most adjacent to the PTV. C-ion RT plans and proton RT plans were calculated by a spot scanning technique, and photon RT plans were calculated employing by fixed-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy. RESULTS: D2 cc and V10–70 of the GI tract were significantly lower on post-spacer plans than on pre-spacer plans for all three RT modalities. Regarding post-spacer plans, D2 cc of the GI tract was significantly lower on C-ion RT plans and proton RT plans than on photon RT plans (C-ion vs photon p = 0.001, proton vs photon p = 0.002). However, there was no significant difference between C-ion RT plans and proton RT plans for D2 cc of the GI tract (C-ion vs proton p = 0.992). In the photon RT plan for one patient, D2 cc of the GI tract did not meet < 50 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: The GO spacer shows a significant dose reduction effect on the GI tract.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6868713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68687132019-12-12 In silico comparison of the dosimetric impacts of a greater omentum spacer for abdominal and pelvic tumors in carbon-ion, proton and photon radiotherapy Yamada, Masayoshi Sato, Hiraku Ieko, Yoshiro Miyasaka, Yuya Kanai, Takayuki Yano, Natsuko Ono, Takashi Akamatsu, Hiroko Harada, Mayumi Ichikawa, Mayumi Teranishi, Yasushi Kikuchi, Yasuhiro Nemoto, Kenji Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare carbon-ion (C-ion), proton and photon radiotherapy (RT) plans with regard to dose reduction of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract by using a greater omentum spacer (GO spacer). METHODS: We retrospectively retrieved data for ten patients who received the GO spacer as surgical spacer placement for abdominal and pelvic tumors. Simulation plans were created on pre-spacer Computed Tomography (CT) and post-spacer CT for C-ion RT, proton RT and photon RT to compare the dose of the GI tract. The plans were normalized so that at least 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) received 70 Gy (relative biological effectiveness equivalent) delivered in 35 fractions. All plans were created with the lowest possible dose to the GI tract under conditions that meet the dose constraints for the PTV and spinal cord (maximum dose < 45 Gy). The part of the GI tract to be evaluated was defined as that most adjacent to the PTV. C-ion RT plans and proton RT plans were calculated by a spot scanning technique, and photon RT plans were calculated employing by fixed-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy. RESULTS: D2 cc and V10–70 of the GI tract were significantly lower on post-spacer plans than on pre-spacer plans for all three RT modalities. Regarding post-spacer plans, D2 cc of the GI tract was significantly lower on C-ion RT plans and proton RT plans than on photon RT plans (C-ion vs photon p = 0.001, proton vs photon p = 0.002). However, there was no significant difference between C-ion RT plans and proton RT plans for D2 cc of the GI tract (C-ion vs proton p = 0.992). In the photon RT plan for one patient, D2 cc of the GI tract did not meet < 50 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: The GO spacer shows a significant dose reduction effect on the GI tract. BioMed Central 2019-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6868713/ /pubmed/31752932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1411-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Yamada, Masayoshi
Sato, Hiraku
Ieko, Yoshiro
Miyasaka, Yuya
Kanai, Takayuki
Yano, Natsuko
Ono, Takashi
Akamatsu, Hiroko
Harada, Mayumi
Ichikawa, Mayumi
Teranishi, Yasushi
Kikuchi, Yasuhiro
Nemoto, Kenji
In silico comparison of the dosimetric impacts of a greater omentum spacer for abdominal and pelvic tumors in carbon-ion, proton and photon radiotherapy
title In silico comparison of the dosimetric impacts of a greater omentum spacer for abdominal and pelvic tumors in carbon-ion, proton and photon radiotherapy
title_full In silico comparison of the dosimetric impacts of a greater omentum spacer for abdominal and pelvic tumors in carbon-ion, proton and photon radiotherapy
title_fullStr In silico comparison of the dosimetric impacts of a greater omentum spacer for abdominal and pelvic tumors in carbon-ion, proton and photon radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed In silico comparison of the dosimetric impacts of a greater omentum spacer for abdominal and pelvic tumors in carbon-ion, proton and photon radiotherapy
title_short In silico comparison of the dosimetric impacts of a greater omentum spacer for abdominal and pelvic tumors in carbon-ion, proton and photon radiotherapy
title_sort in silico comparison of the dosimetric impacts of a greater omentum spacer for abdominal and pelvic tumors in carbon-ion, proton and photon radiotherapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31752932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1411-0
work_keys_str_mv AT yamadamasayoshi insilicocomparisonofthedosimetricimpactsofagreateromentumspacerforabdominalandpelvictumorsincarbonionprotonandphotonradiotherapy
AT satohiraku insilicocomparisonofthedosimetricimpactsofagreateromentumspacerforabdominalandpelvictumorsincarbonionprotonandphotonradiotherapy
AT iekoyoshiro insilicocomparisonofthedosimetricimpactsofagreateromentumspacerforabdominalandpelvictumorsincarbonionprotonandphotonradiotherapy
AT miyasakayuya insilicocomparisonofthedosimetricimpactsofagreateromentumspacerforabdominalandpelvictumorsincarbonionprotonandphotonradiotherapy
AT kanaitakayuki insilicocomparisonofthedosimetricimpactsofagreateromentumspacerforabdominalandpelvictumorsincarbonionprotonandphotonradiotherapy
AT yanonatsuko insilicocomparisonofthedosimetricimpactsofagreateromentumspacerforabdominalandpelvictumorsincarbonionprotonandphotonradiotherapy
AT onotakashi insilicocomparisonofthedosimetricimpactsofagreateromentumspacerforabdominalandpelvictumorsincarbonionprotonandphotonradiotherapy
AT akamatsuhiroko insilicocomparisonofthedosimetricimpactsofagreateromentumspacerforabdominalandpelvictumorsincarbonionprotonandphotonradiotherapy
AT haradamayumi insilicocomparisonofthedosimetricimpactsofagreateromentumspacerforabdominalandpelvictumorsincarbonionprotonandphotonradiotherapy
AT ichikawamayumi insilicocomparisonofthedosimetricimpactsofagreateromentumspacerforabdominalandpelvictumorsincarbonionprotonandphotonradiotherapy
AT teranishiyasushi insilicocomparisonofthedosimetricimpactsofagreateromentumspacerforabdominalandpelvictumorsincarbonionprotonandphotonradiotherapy
AT kikuchiyasuhiro insilicocomparisonofthedosimetricimpactsofagreateromentumspacerforabdominalandpelvictumorsincarbonionprotonandphotonradiotherapy
AT nemotokenji insilicocomparisonofthedosimetricimpactsofagreateromentumspacerforabdominalandpelvictumorsincarbonionprotonandphotonradiotherapy