Cargando…

Movement kinematics and proprioception in post-stroke spasticity: assessment using the Kinarm robotic exoskeleton

BACKGROUND: Motor impairment after stroke interferes with performance of everyday activities. Upper limb spasticity may further disrupt the movement patterns that enable optimal function; however, the specific features of these altered movement patterns, which differentiate individuals with and with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mochizuki, George, Centen, Andrew, Resnick, Myles, Lowrey, Catherine, Dukelow, Sean P., Scott, Stephen H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31753011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0618-5
_version_ 1783472337209786368
author Mochizuki, George
Centen, Andrew
Resnick, Myles
Lowrey, Catherine
Dukelow, Sean P.
Scott, Stephen H.
author_facet Mochizuki, George
Centen, Andrew
Resnick, Myles
Lowrey, Catherine
Dukelow, Sean P.
Scott, Stephen H.
author_sort Mochizuki, George
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Motor impairment after stroke interferes with performance of everyday activities. Upper limb spasticity may further disrupt the movement patterns that enable optimal function; however, the specific features of these altered movement patterns, which differentiate individuals with and without spasticity, have not been fully identified. This study aimed to characterize the kinematic and proprioceptive deficits of individuals with upper limb spasticity after stroke using the Kinarm robotic exoskeleton. METHODS: Upper limb function was characterized using two tasks: Visually Guided Reaching, in which participants moved the limb from a central target to 1 of 4 or 1 of 8 outer targets when cued (measuring reaching function) and Arm Position Matching, in which participants moved the less-affected arm to mirror match the position of the affected arm (measuring proprioception), which was passively moved to 1 of 4 or 1 of 9 different positions. Comparisons were made between individuals with (n = 35) and without (n = 35) upper limb post-stroke spasticity. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in affected limb performance between groups were observed in reaching-specific measures characterizing movement time and movement speed, as well as an overall metric for the Visually Guided Reaching task. While both groups demonstrated deficits in proprioception compared to normative values, no differences were observed between groups. Modified Ashworth Scale score was significantly correlated with these same measures. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that individuals with spasticity experience greater deficits in temporal features of movement while reaching, but not in proprioception in comparison to individuals with post-stroke motor impairment without spasticity. Temporal features of movement can be potential targets for rehabilitation in individuals with upper limb spasticity after stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6868757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68687572019-12-12 Movement kinematics and proprioception in post-stroke spasticity: assessment using the Kinarm robotic exoskeleton Mochizuki, George Centen, Andrew Resnick, Myles Lowrey, Catherine Dukelow, Sean P. Scott, Stephen H. J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Motor impairment after stroke interferes with performance of everyday activities. Upper limb spasticity may further disrupt the movement patterns that enable optimal function; however, the specific features of these altered movement patterns, which differentiate individuals with and without spasticity, have not been fully identified. This study aimed to characterize the kinematic and proprioceptive deficits of individuals with upper limb spasticity after stroke using the Kinarm robotic exoskeleton. METHODS: Upper limb function was characterized using two tasks: Visually Guided Reaching, in which participants moved the limb from a central target to 1 of 4 or 1 of 8 outer targets when cued (measuring reaching function) and Arm Position Matching, in which participants moved the less-affected arm to mirror match the position of the affected arm (measuring proprioception), which was passively moved to 1 of 4 or 1 of 9 different positions. Comparisons were made between individuals with (n = 35) and without (n = 35) upper limb post-stroke spasticity. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in affected limb performance between groups were observed in reaching-specific measures characterizing movement time and movement speed, as well as an overall metric for the Visually Guided Reaching task. While both groups demonstrated deficits in proprioception compared to normative values, no differences were observed between groups. Modified Ashworth Scale score was significantly correlated with these same measures. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that individuals with spasticity experience greater deficits in temporal features of movement while reaching, but not in proprioception in comparison to individuals with post-stroke motor impairment without spasticity. Temporal features of movement can be potential targets for rehabilitation in individuals with upper limb spasticity after stroke. BioMed Central 2019-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6868757/ /pubmed/31753011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0618-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Mochizuki, George
Centen, Andrew
Resnick, Myles
Lowrey, Catherine
Dukelow, Sean P.
Scott, Stephen H.
Movement kinematics and proprioception in post-stroke spasticity: assessment using the Kinarm robotic exoskeleton
title Movement kinematics and proprioception in post-stroke spasticity: assessment using the Kinarm robotic exoskeleton
title_full Movement kinematics and proprioception in post-stroke spasticity: assessment using the Kinarm robotic exoskeleton
title_fullStr Movement kinematics and proprioception in post-stroke spasticity: assessment using the Kinarm robotic exoskeleton
title_full_unstemmed Movement kinematics and proprioception in post-stroke spasticity: assessment using the Kinarm robotic exoskeleton
title_short Movement kinematics and proprioception in post-stroke spasticity: assessment using the Kinarm robotic exoskeleton
title_sort movement kinematics and proprioception in post-stroke spasticity: assessment using the kinarm robotic exoskeleton
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31753011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0618-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mochizukigeorge movementkinematicsandproprioceptioninpoststrokespasticityassessmentusingthekinarmroboticexoskeleton
AT centenandrew movementkinematicsandproprioceptioninpoststrokespasticityassessmentusingthekinarmroboticexoskeleton
AT resnickmyles movementkinematicsandproprioceptioninpoststrokespasticityassessmentusingthekinarmroboticexoskeleton
AT lowreycatherine movementkinematicsandproprioceptioninpoststrokespasticityassessmentusingthekinarmroboticexoskeleton
AT dukelowseanp movementkinematicsandproprioceptioninpoststrokespasticityassessmentusingthekinarmroboticexoskeleton
AT scottstephenh movementkinematicsandproprioceptioninpoststrokespasticityassessmentusingthekinarmroboticexoskeleton