Cargando…

Development and validation of traditional & complementary medicine (TCM) scales for nurses: Using structural equation modelling (SEM)

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop and validate scales to assess attitudes towards patient’ s use of TCM (APUTCM) and to measure a communicative competence in TCM (CCTCM) among nurses. METHODS: The instrument development process was conducted from Sep 2013 to Jul 2014, using the following steps...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Hsiao-Yun, Lo, Chia-Lun, Hung, Yun-Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31752832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2733-z
_version_ 1783472350147117056
author Chang, Hsiao-Yun
Lo, Chia-Lun
Hung, Yun-Ying
author_facet Chang, Hsiao-Yun
Lo, Chia-Lun
Hung, Yun-Ying
author_sort Chang, Hsiao-Yun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop and validate scales to assess attitudes towards patient’ s use of TCM (APUTCM) and to measure a communicative competence in TCM (CCTCM) among nurses. METHODS: The instrument development process was conducted from Sep 2013 to Jul 2014, using the following steps: 1) item development; 2) internal review and refinement; 3) face and content validation; 4) instrument administration to a development sample; and 5) evaluation of validity and reliability. A convenience sample was used to recruit registered and advanced practice nurses who worked in different regions throughout Taiwan. A total of 755 respondents completed the online questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed using the software of SPSS Version 21.0 and Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS) version 24.0. RESULTS: The scale-level indexes (S-CVI) of content validity for both scales were over 80%. The reliabilities for the 13-item APUTCM scale and for the five-item CCTCM scale were 0.88 and 0.84, respectively. The model suitability for both scales was assessed, and the findings revealed suitable parameters for all indicators: GFI = 0.954, AGFI = 0.932, CFI = 0.959, RMSEA = 0.62, and chi-square/df = 3.891 for APUTCM; and GFI = 0.992, AGFI = 0.969, CFI = 0.992, RMSEA = 0.63, and chi-square/df = 4.04 for CCTCM. The convergent and divergent validity of scores on both scales provided evidence in the expected direction. CONCLUSION: This scale development study provides preliminary evidence that suggests that the 13-item APUTCM and the five-item CCTCM are reliable and valid scales for assessing attitudes toward patient’s TCM use and communicative competence in TCM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6868815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68688152019-12-12 Development and validation of traditional & complementary medicine (TCM) scales for nurses: Using structural equation modelling (SEM) Chang, Hsiao-Yun Lo, Chia-Lun Hung, Yun-Ying BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop and validate scales to assess attitudes towards patient’ s use of TCM (APUTCM) and to measure a communicative competence in TCM (CCTCM) among nurses. METHODS: The instrument development process was conducted from Sep 2013 to Jul 2014, using the following steps: 1) item development; 2) internal review and refinement; 3) face and content validation; 4) instrument administration to a development sample; and 5) evaluation of validity and reliability. A convenience sample was used to recruit registered and advanced practice nurses who worked in different regions throughout Taiwan. A total of 755 respondents completed the online questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed using the software of SPSS Version 21.0 and Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS) version 24.0. RESULTS: The scale-level indexes (S-CVI) of content validity for both scales were over 80%. The reliabilities for the 13-item APUTCM scale and for the five-item CCTCM scale were 0.88 and 0.84, respectively. The model suitability for both scales was assessed, and the findings revealed suitable parameters for all indicators: GFI = 0.954, AGFI = 0.932, CFI = 0.959, RMSEA = 0.62, and chi-square/df = 3.891 for APUTCM; and GFI = 0.992, AGFI = 0.969, CFI = 0.992, RMSEA = 0.63, and chi-square/df = 4.04 for CCTCM. The convergent and divergent validity of scores on both scales provided evidence in the expected direction. CONCLUSION: This scale development study provides preliminary evidence that suggests that the 13-item APUTCM and the five-item CCTCM are reliable and valid scales for assessing attitudes toward patient’s TCM use and communicative competence in TCM. BioMed Central 2019-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6868815/ /pubmed/31752832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2733-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chang, Hsiao-Yun
Lo, Chia-Lun
Hung, Yun-Ying
Development and validation of traditional & complementary medicine (TCM) scales for nurses: Using structural equation modelling (SEM)
title Development and validation of traditional & complementary medicine (TCM) scales for nurses: Using structural equation modelling (SEM)
title_full Development and validation of traditional & complementary medicine (TCM) scales for nurses: Using structural equation modelling (SEM)
title_fullStr Development and validation of traditional & complementary medicine (TCM) scales for nurses: Using structural equation modelling (SEM)
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of traditional & complementary medicine (TCM) scales for nurses: Using structural equation modelling (SEM)
title_short Development and validation of traditional & complementary medicine (TCM) scales for nurses: Using structural equation modelling (SEM)
title_sort development and validation of traditional & complementary medicine (tcm) scales for nurses: using structural equation modelling (sem)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6868815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31752832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2733-z
work_keys_str_mv AT changhsiaoyun developmentandvalidationoftraditionalcomplementarymedicinetcmscalesfornursesusingstructuralequationmodellingsem
AT lochialun developmentandvalidationoftraditionalcomplementarymedicinetcmscalesfornursesusingstructuralequationmodellingsem
AT hungyunying developmentandvalidationoftraditionalcomplementarymedicinetcmscalesfornursesusingstructuralequationmodellingsem