Cargando…

Is selecting better than modifying? An investigation of arguments against germline gene editing as compared to preimplantation genetic diagnosis

BACKGROUND: Recent scientific advances in the field of gene editing have led to a renewed discussion on the moral acceptability of human germline modifications. Gene editing methods can be used on human embryos and gametes in order to change DNA sequences that are associated with diseases. Modifying...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	v. Hammerstein, Alix Lenia, Eggel, Matthias, Biller-Andorno, Nikola
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2019
Materias:	Debate
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6869262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31752935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0411-9

Ejemplares similares

Palliative psychiatry for severe persistent mental illness as a new approach to psychiatry? Definition, scope, benefits, and risks
por: Trachsel, Manuel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

AI model GPT-3 (dis)informs us better than humans
por: Spitale, Giovanni, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Why the fair innings argument is not persuasive
por: Rivlin, Michael M
Publicado: (2000)

Conscientious objection to intentional killing: an argument for toleration
por: Myskja, Bjørn K., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Developing the ethics of implementation research in health
por: Gopichandran, Vijayaprasad, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Human germline editing in the era of CRISPR-Cas: risk and uncertainty, inter-generational responsibility, therapeutic legitimacy
por: Schleidgen, Sebastian, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

An argument against the focus on Community Resilience in Public Health
por: Allmark, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Emotion and Value in the Evaluation of Medical Decision-Making Capacity: A Narrative Review of Arguments
por: Hermann, Helena, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Medical therapy is best for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: Arguments for
por: Annigeri, R. A.
Publicado: (2012)

The Road to Hell Is Paved with Good Intentions: Why Harm–Benefit Analysis and Its Emphasis on Practical Benefit Jeopardizes the Credibility of Research
por: Grimm, Herwig, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Evaluation as institution: a contractarian argument for needs-based economic evaluation
por: Rogowski, Wolf H.
Publicado: (2018)

Message to complementary and alternative medicine: evidence is a better friend than power
por: Vickers, Andrew J
Publicado: (2001)

The no correlation argument: can the morality of conscientious objection be empirically supported? the Italian case
por: Bo, Marco, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Medical concepts related to individual risk are better explained with "plausibility" rather than "probability"
por: Grossi, Enzo
Publicado: (2005)

Addressing the policy cacophony does not require more evidence: an argument for reframing obesity as caloric overconsumption
por: Shelley, Jacob J
Publicado: (2012)

Combining value of information analysis and ethical argumentation in decisions on participation of vulnerable patients in clinical research
por: van der Wilt, Gert J., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Debates in Allergy Medicine: Oral immunotherapy shortens the duration of milk and egg allergy - the con argument
por: Loh, Wenyin, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Debates in Allergy Medicine: Does oral immunotherapy shorten the duration of milk and egg allergy? The pro argument
por: Pecora, Valentina, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Ethical arguments against coercing provider participation in MAiD (medical assistance in dying) in Ontario, Canada
por: Carpenter, Travis, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

An argument for pandemic risk management using a multidisciplinary One Health approach to governance: an Australian case study
por: Woolaston, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Measures and models for causal inference in cross-sectional studies: arguments for the appropriateness of the prevalence odds ratio and related logistic regression
por: Reichenheim, Michael E, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

In Defence of informed consent for health record research - why arguments from ‘easy rescue’, ‘no harm’ and ‘consent bias’ fail
por: Ploug, Thomas
Publicado: (2020)

Germline genome editing versus preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Is there a case in favour of germline interventions?
por: Ranisch, Robert
Publicado: (2019)

“Tobacco dependence treatment makes no sense because”…: Rebuttal of commonly-heard arguments against providing tobacco dependence treatment in the hospital setting
por: Balmford, James, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Screening: the information individuals need to support their decision: per protocol analysis is better than intention-to-treat analysis at quantifying potential benefits and harms of screening
por: Giorgi Rossi, Paolo
Publicado: (2014)

Better data for better outcomes: the importance of process mapping and management in CRVS systems
por: Cobos Muñoz, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach!
por: Geraedts, Joep, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Germline stem cells in the postnatal mammalian ovary: A phenomenon of prosimian primates and mice?
por: Telfer, Evelyn E
Publicado: (2004)

Better governance starts with better words: why responsible human tissue research demands a change of language
por: Lensink, Michael A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Human genome editing: how to prevent rogue actors
por: Townsend, Beverley A.
Publicado: (2020)

Limits to human enhancement: nature, disease, therapy or betterment?
por: Hofmann, Bjørn
Publicado: (2017)

Health policy and systems research: towards a better understanding and review of ethical issues
por: Luyckx, Valerie Ann, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better?
por: Wegewitz, Uta, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Chiropractic, one big unhappy family: better together or apart?
por: Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Innovative regenerative medicines in the EU: a better future in evidence?
por: Corbett, Mark S., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Subspecialisation within infection prevention and control: the argument in favour
por: Weinbren, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The Diagnosis and Management of UTI in >65s: To Dipstick or Not? The Argument For Dipsticks
por: Cooper, Mike A.
Publicado: (2020)

Subspecialisation within infection prevention and control: the argument against
por: Wilson, A. Peter R., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Pharmacogenomic technologies: a necessary "luxury" for better global public health?
por: Olivier, Catherine, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Kettil Bruun is more relevant than ever
por: Hellman, Matilda
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_556isg8qhbdp49rbeaf4v0a38f