Cargando…

Differences in cortical coding of heat evoked pain beyond the perceived intensity: An fMRI and EEG study

Imaging studies have identified a wide network of brain areas activated by nociceptive stimuli and revealed differences in somatotopic representation of highly distinct stimulation sites (foot vs. hand) in the primary (S1) and secondary (S2) somatosensory cortices. Somatotopic organization between a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haefeli, Jenny, Freund, Patrick, Kramer, John L.K., Blum, Julia, Luechinger, Roger, Curt, Armin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6869572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23450833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22260
_version_ 1783472393814016000
author Haefeli, Jenny
Freund, Patrick
Kramer, John L.K.
Blum, Julia
Luechinger, Roger
Curt, Armin
author_facet Haefeli, Jenny
Freund, Patrick
Kramer, John L.K.
Blum, Julia
Luechinger, Roger
Curt, Armin
author_sort Haefeli, Jenny
collection PubMed
description Imaging studies have identified a wide network of brain areas activated by nociceptive stimuli and revealed differences in somatotopic representation of highly distinct stimulation sites (foot vs. hand) in the primary (S1) and secondary (S2) somatosensory cortices. Somatotopic organization between adjacent dermatomes and differences in cortical coding of similarly perceived nociceptive stimulation are less well studied. Here, cortical processing following contact heat nociceptive stimulation of cervical (C4, C6, and C8) and trunk (T10) dermatomes were recorded in 20 healthy subjects using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG). Stimulation of T10 compared with the C6 and C8 revealed significant higher response intensity in the left S1 (contralateral) and the right S2 (ipsilateral) even when the perceived pain was equal between stimulation sites. Accordingly, contact heat evoked potentials following stimulation of T10 showed significantly higher N2P2 amplitudes compared to C6 and C8. Adjacent dermatomes did not reveal a distinct somatotopical representation. Within the assessed cervical and trunk dermatomes, nociceptive cortical processing to heat differs significantly in magnitude even when controlling for pain perception. This study provides evidence that controlling for pain perception is not sufficient to compare directly the magnitude of cortical processing [blood oxygen level dependence (BOLD) response and amplitude of evoked potentials] between body sites. Hum Brain Mapp 35:1379–1389, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6869572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68695722020-06-12 Differences in cortical coding of heat evoked pain beyond the perceived intensity: An fMRI and EEG study Haefeli, Jenny Freund, Patrick Kramer, John L.K. Blum, Julia Luechinger, Roger Curt, Armin Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Imaging studies have identified a wide network of brain areas activated by nociceptive stimuli and revealed differences in somatotopic representation of highly distinct stimulation sites (foot vs. hand) in the primary (S1) and secondary (S2) somatosensory cortices. Somatotopic organization between adjacent dermatomes and differences in cortical coding of similarly perceived nociceptive stimulation are less well studied. Here, cortical processing following contact heat nociceptive stimulation of cervical (C4, C6, and C8) and trunk (T10) dermatomes were recorded in 20 healthy subjects using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG). Stimulation of T10 compared with the C6 and C8 revealed significant higher response intensity in the left S1 (contralateral) and the right S2 (ipsilateral) even when the perceived pain was equal between stimulation sites. Accordingly, contact heat evoked potentials following stimulation of T10 showed significantly higher N2P2 amplitudes compared to C6 and C8. Adjacent dermatomes did not reveal a distinct somatotopical representation. Within the assessed cervical and trunk dermatomes, nociceptive cortical processing to heat differs significantly in magnitude even when controlling for pain perception. This study provides evidence that controlling for pain perception is not sufficient to compare directly the magnitude of cortical processing [blood oxygen level dependence (BOLD) response and amplitude of evoked potentials] between body sites. Hum Brain Mapp 35:1379–1389, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6869572/ /pubmed/23450833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22260 Text en Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Open access.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Haefeli, Jenny
Freund, Patrick
Kramer, John L.K.
Blum, Julia
Luechinger, Roger
Curt, Armin
Differences in cortical coding of heat evoked pain beyond the perceived intensity: An fMRI and EEG study
title Differences in cortical coding of heat evoked pain beyond the perceived intensity: An fMRI and EEG study
title_full Differences in cortical coding of heat evoked pain beyond the perceived intensity: An fMRI and EEG study
title_fullStr Differences in cortical coding of heat evoked pain beyond the perceived intensity: An fMRI and EEG study
title_full_unstemmed Differences in cortical coding of heat evoked pain beyond the perceived intensity: An fMRI and EEG study
title_short Differences in cortical coding of heat evoked pain beyond the perceived intensity: An fMRI and EEG study
title_sort differences in cortical coding of heat evoked pain beyond the perceived intensity: an fmri and eeg study
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6869572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23450833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22260
work_keys_str_mv AT haefelijenny differencesincorticalcodingofheatevokedpainbeyondtheperceivedintensityanfmriandeegstudy
AT freundpatrick differencesincorticalcodingofheatevokedpainbeyondtheperceivedintensityanfmriandeegstudy
AT kramerjohnlk differencesincorticalcodingofheatevokedpainbeyondtheperceivedintensityanfmriandeegstudy
AT blumjulia differencesincorticalcodingofheatevokedpainbeyondtheperceivedintensityanfmriandeegstudy
AT luechingerroger differencesincorticalcodingofheatevokedpainbeyondtheperceivedintensityanfmriandeegstudy
AT curtarmin differencesincorticalcodingofheatevokedpainbeyondtheperceivedintensityanfmriandeegstudy