Cargando…

Comparison of SMS-EPI and 3D-EPI at 7T in an fMRI localizer study with matched spatiotemporal resolution and homogenized excitation profiles

The simultaneous multi-slice EPI (SMS-EPI, a.k.a. MB-EPI) sequence has met immense popularity recently in functional neuroimaging. A still less common alternative is the use of 3D-EPI, which offers similar acceleration capabilities. The aim of this work was to compare the SMS-EPI and the 3D-EPI sequ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le Ster, Caroline, Moreno, Antonio, Mauconduit, Franck, Gras, Vincent, Stirnberg, Ruediger, Poser, Benedikt A., Vignaud, Alexandre, Eger, Evelyn, Dehaene, Stanislas, Meyniel, Florent, Boulant, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6872176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31751410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225286
_version_ 1783472447115231232
author Le Ster, Caroline
Moreno, Antonio
Mauconduit, Franck
Gras, Vincent
Stirnberg, Ruediger
Poser, Benedikt A.
Vignaud, Alexandre
Eger, Evelyn
Dehaene, Stanislas
Meyniel, Florent
Boulant, Nicolas
author_facet Le Ster, Caroline
Moreno, Antonio
Mauconduit, Franck
Gras, Vincent
Stirnberg, Ruediger
Poser, Benedikt A.
Vignaud, Alexandre
Eger, Evelyn
Dehaene, Stanislas
Meyniel, Florent
Boulant, Nicolas
author_sort Le Ster, Caroline
collection PubMed
description The simultaneous multi-slice EPI (SMS-EPI, a.k.a. MB-EPI) sequence has met immense popularity recently in functional neuroimaging. A still less common alternative is the use of 3D-EPI, which offers similar acceleration capabilities. The aim of this work was to compare the SMS-EPI and the 3D-EPI sequences in terms of sampling strategies for the detection of task-evoked activations at 7T using detection theory. To this end, the spatial and temporal resolutions of the sequences were matched (1.6 mm isotropic resolution, TR = 1200 ms) and their excitation profiles were homogenized by means of calibration-free parallel-transmission (Universal Pulses). We used a fast-event “localizer” paradigm of 5:20 min in order to probe sensorimotor functions (visual, auditory and motor tasks) as well as higher level functions (language comprehension, mental calculation), where results from a previous large-scale study at 3T (N = 81) served as ground-truth reference for the brain areas implicated in each cognitive function. In the current study, ten subjects were scanned while their activation maps were generated for each cognitive function with the GLM analysis. The SMS-EPI and 3D-EPI sequences were compared in terms of raw tSNR, t-score testing for the mean signal, activation strength and accuracy of the robust sensorimotor functions. To this end, the sensitivity and specificity of these contrasts were computed by comparing their activation maps to the reference brain areas obtained in the 3T study. Estimated flip angle distributions in the brain reported a normalized root mean square deviation from the target value below 10% for both sequences. The analysis of the t-score testing for the mean signal revealed temporal noise correlations, suggesting the use of this metric instead of the traditional tSNR for testing fMRI sequences. The SMS-EPI and 3D-EPI thereby yielded similar performance from a detection theory perspective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6872176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68721762019-12-08 Comparison of SMS-EPI and 3D-EPI at 7T in an fMRI localizer study with matched spatiotemporal resolution and homogenized excitation profiles Le Ster, Caroline Moreno, Antonio Mauconduit, Franck Gras, Vincent Stirnberg, Ruediger Poser, Benedikt A. Vignaud, Alexandre Eger, Evelyn Dehaene, Stanislas Meyniel, Florent Boulant, Nicolas PLoS One Research Article The simultaneous multi-slice EPI (SMS-EPI, a.k.a. MB-EPI) sequence has met immense popularity recently in functional neuroimaging. A still less common alternative is the use of 3D-EPI, which offers similar acceleration capabilities. The aim of this work was to compare the SMS-EPI and the 3D-EPI sequences in terms of sampling strategies for the detection of task-evoked activations at 7T using detection theory. To this end, the spatial and temporal resolutions of the sequences were matched (1.6 mm isotropic resolution, TR = 1200 ms) and their excitation profiles were homogenized by means of calibration-free parallel-transmission (Universal Pulses). We used a fast-event “localizer” paradigm of 5:20 min in order to probe sensorimotor functions (visual, auditory and motor tasks) as well as higher level functions (language comprehension, mental calculation), where results from a previous large-scale study at 3T (N = 81) served as ground-truth reference for the brain areas implicated in each cognitive function. In the current study, ten subjects were scanned while their activation maps were generated for each cognitive function with the GLM analysis. The SMS-EPI and 3D-EPI sequences were compared in terms of raw tSNR, t-score testing for the mean signal, activation strength and accuracy of the robust sensorimotor functions. To this end, the sensitivity and specificity of these contrasts were computed by comparing their activation maps to the reference brain areas obtained in the 3T study. Estimated flip angle distributions in the brain reported a normalized root mean square deviation from the target value below 10% for both sequences. The analysis of the t-score testing for the mean signal revealed temporal noise correlations, suggesting the use of this metric instead of the traditional tSNR for testing fMRI sequences. The SMS-EPI and 3D-EPI thereby yielded similar performance from a detection theory perspective. Public Library of Science 2019-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6872176/ /pubmed/31751410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225286 Text en © 2019 Le Ster et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Le Ster, Caroline
Moreno, Antonio
Mauconduit, Franck
Gras, Vincent
Stirnberg, Ruediger
Poser, Benedikt A.
Vignaud, Alexandre
Eger, Evelyn
Dehaene, Stanislas
Meyniel, Florent
Boulant, Nicolas
Comparison of SMS-EPI and 3D-EPI at 7T in an fMRI localizer study with matched spatiotemporal resolution and homogenized excitation profiles
title Comparison of SMS-EPI and 3D-EPI at 7T in an fMRI localizer study with matched spatiotemporal resolution and homogenized excitation profiles
title_full Comparison of SMS-EPI and 3D-EPI at 7T in an fMRI localizer study with matched spatiotemporal resolution and homogenized excitation profiles
title_fullStr Comparison of SMS-EPI and 3D-EPI at 7T in an fMRI localizer study with matched spatiotemporal resolution and homogenized excitation profiles
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of SMS-EPI and 3D-EPI at 7T in an fMRI localizer study with matched spatiotemporal resolution and homogenized excitation profiles
title_short Comparison of SMS-EPI and 3D-EPI at 7T in an fMRI localizer study with matched spatiotemporal resolution and homogenized excitation profiles
title_sort comparison of sms-epi and 3d-epi at 7t in an fmri localizer study with matched spatiotemporal resolution and homogenized excitation profiles
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6872176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31751410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225286
work_keys_str_mv AT lestercaroline comparisonofsmsepiand3depiat7tinanfmrilocalizerstudywithmatchedspatiotemporalresolutionandhomogenizedexcitationprofiles
AT morenoantonio comparisonofsmsepiand3depiat7tinanfmrilocalizerstudywithmatchedspatiotemporalresolutionandhomogenizedexcitationprofiles
AT mauconduitfranck comparisonofsmsepiand3depiat7tinanfmrilocalizerstudywithmatchedspatiotemporalresolutionandhomogenizedexcitationprofiles
AT grasvincent comparisonofsmsepiand3depiat7tinanfmrilocalizerstudywithmatchedspatiotemporalresolutionandhomogenizedexcitationprofiles
AT stirnbergruediger comparisonofsmsepiand3depiat7tinanfmrilocalizerstudywithmatchedspatiotemporalresolutionandhomogenizedexcitationprofiles
AT poserbenedikta comparisonofsmsepiand3depiat7tinanfmrilocalizerstudywithmatchedspatiotemporalresolutionandhomogenizedexcitationprofiles
AT vignaudalexandre comparisonofsmsepiand3depiat7tinanfmrilocalizerstudywithmatchedspatiotemporalresolutionandhomogenizedexcitationprofiles
AT egerevelyn comparisonofsmsepiand3depiat7tinanfmrilocalizerstudywithmatchedspatiotemporalresolutionandhomogenizedexcitationprofiles
AT dehaenestanislas comparisonofsmsepiand3depiat7tinanfmrilocalizerstudywithmatchedspatiotemporalresolutionandhomogenizedexcitationprofiles
AT meynielflorent comparisonofsmsepiand3depiat7tinanfmrilocalizerstudywithmatchedspatiotemporalresolutionandhomogenizedexcitationprofiles
AT boulantnicolas comparisonofsmsepiand3depiat7tinanfmrilocalizerstudywithmatchedspatiotemporalresolutionandhomogenizedexcitationprofiles