Cargando…

Hospital staff participation in a national hip fracture audit: facilitators and barriers

SUMMARY: To ensure meaningful results in a clinical audit, as many hospitals as possible should participate. To optimise participation, the data collection process should either be performed by additional staff or be automated. Active participation may be promoted by offering relevant external parti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Voeten, Stijn C., van Bodegom-Vos, Leti, Hegeman, J. H., Wouters, Michel W.J.M., Krijnen, Pieta, Schipper, Inger B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6872508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31754810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-019-0652-8
_version_ 1783472498103287808
author Voeten, Stijn C.
van Bodegom-Vos, Leti
Hegeman, J. H.
Wouters, Michel W.J.M.
Krijnen, Pieta
Schipper, Inger B.
author_facet Voeten, Stijn C.
van Bodegom-Vos, Leti
Hegeman, J. H.
Wouters, Michel W.J.M.
Krijnen, Pieta
Schipper, Inger B.
author_sort Voeten, Stijn C.
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: To ensure meaningful results in a clinical audit, as many hospitals as possible should participate. To optimise participation, the data collection process should either be performed by additional staff or be automated. Active participation may be promoted by offering relevant external parties insight into the actual quality of care. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to identify which facilitators and barriers experienced by hospital staff are associated with participation in the ongoing nationwide multidisciplinary Dutch Hip Fracture Audit (DHFA). METHODS: A survey including questions about the respondents’ characteristics, hospital level of participation and factors of influence on DHFA participation was sent to hip fracture surgeons. The factors were based on results of semi-structured interviews held with hospital staff involved in hip fracture care. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to establish which respondent characteristics and factors were associated with participation and active participation (≥ 80% of patients registered) in the DHFA. Factors significantly increasing the (active) participation in the DHFA were classified as facilitators, and factors significantly decreasing the (active) participation in the DHFA as barriers. RESULTS: One hundred nine surgeons filled out the questionnaire. The factors most agreed on were availability of staffing capacity for data collection and automated data import. A lower intention to participate was associated with being an academic surgeon (odds ratio, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.04–0.52) and an orthopaedic surgeon (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.10–0.90). Data sharing with relevant external parties was associated with active participation (odds ratio, 3.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–8.95). CONCLUSIONS: To improve participation in a nationwide clinical audit, it seems that the data collection should either be performed by additional staff or be automated. Active participation is facilitated if audit data is made available to other parties, such as insurers, healthcare authorities or policymakers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6872508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68725082019-12-05 Hospital staff participation in a national hip fracture audit: facilitators and barriers Voeten, Stijn C. van Bodegom-Vos, Leti Hegeman, J. H. Wouters, Michel W.J.M. Krijnen, Pieta Schipper, Inger B. Arch Osteoporos Original Article SUMMARY: To ensure meaningful results in a clinical audit, as many hospitals as possible should participate. To optimise participation, the data collection process should either be performed by additional staff or be automated. Active participation may be promoted by offering relevant external parties insight into the actual quality of care. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to identify which facilitators and barriers experienced by hospital staff are associated with participation in the ongoing nationwide multidisciplinary Dutch Hip Fracture Audit (DHFA). METHODS: A survey including questions about the respondents’ characteristics, hospital level of participation and factors of influence on DHFA participation was sent to hip fracture surgeons. The factors were based on results of semi-structured interviews held with hospital staff involved in hip fracture care. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to establish which respondent characteristics and factors were associated with participation and active participation (≥ 80% of patients registered) in the DHFA. Factors significantly increasing the (active) participation in the DHFA were classified as facilitators, and factors significantly decreasing the (active) participation in the DHFA as barriers. RESULTS: One hundred nine surgeons filled out the questionnaire. The factors most agreed on were availability of staffing capacity for data collection and automated data import. A lower intention to participate was associated with being an academic surgeon (odds ratio, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.04–0.52) and an orthopaedic surgeon (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.10–0.90). Data sharing with relevant external parties was associated with active participation (odds ratio, 3.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–8.95). CONCLUSIONS: To improve participation in a nationwide clinical audit, it seems that the data collection should either be performed by additional staff or be automated. Active participation is facilitated if audit data is made available to other parties, such as insurers, healthcare authorities or policymakers. Springer London 2019-11-21 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6872508/ /pubmed/31754810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-019-0652-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Voeten, Stijn C.
van Bodegom-Vos, Leti
Hegeman, J. H.
Wouters, Michel W.J.M.
Krijnen, Pieta
Schipper, Inger B.
Hospital staff participation in a national hip fracture audit: facilitators and barriers
title Hospital staff participation in a national hip fracture audit: facilitators and barriers
title_full Hospital staff participation in a national hip fracture audit: facilitators and barriers
title_fullStr Hospital staff participation in a national hip fracture audit: facilitators and barriers
title_full_unstemmed Hospital staff participation in a national hip fracture audit: facilitators and barriers
title_short Hospital staff participation in a national hip fracture audit: facilitators and barriers
title_sort hospital staff participation in a national hip fracture audit: facilitators and barriers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6872508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31754810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-019-0652-8
work_keys_str_mv AT voetenstijnc hospitalstaffparticipationinanationalhipfractureauditfacilitatorsandbarriers
AT vanbodegomvosleti hospitalstaffparticipationinanationalhipfractureauditfacilitatorsandbarriers
AT hegemanjh hospitalstaffparticipationinanationalhipfractureauditfacilitatorsandbarriers
AT woutersmichelwjm hospitalstaffparticipationinanationalhipfractureauditfacilitatorsandbarriers
AT krijnenpieta hospitalstaffparticipationinanationalhipfractureauditfacilitatorsandbarriers
AT schipperingerb hospitalstaffparticipationinanationalhipfractureauditfacilitatorsandbarriers