Cargando…

Strength and aging resistance of monolithic zirconia: an update to current knowledge

New zirconia compositions with optimized esthetic properties have emerged due to the fast-growing technology in zirconia manufacturing. However, the large variety of commercial products and synthesis routes, make impossible to include all of them under the general term of “monolithic zirconia cerami...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kontonasaki, Eleana, Giasimakopoulos, Panagiotis, Rigos, Athanasios E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6872834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31768195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2019.09.002
_version_ 1783472575262752768
author Kontonasaki, Eleana
Giasimakopoulos, Panagiotis
Rigos, Athanasios E.
author_facet Kontonasaki, Eleana
Giasimakopoulos, Panagiotis
Rigos, Athanasios E.
author_sort Kontonasaki, Eleana
collection PubMed
description New zirconia compositions with optimized esthetic properties have emerged due to the fast-growing technology in zirconia manufacturing. However, the large variety of commercial products and synthesis routes, make impossible to include all of them under the general term of “monolithic zirconia ceramics”. Ultra- or high translucent monolithic formulations contain 3–8 mol% yttria, which results in materials with completely different structure, optical and mechanical properties. The purpose of this study was to provide an update to the current knowledge concerning monolithic zirconia and to review factors related to strength and aging resistance. Factors such as composition, coloring procedures, sintering method and temperature, may affect both strength and aging resistance to a more or less extend. A significant reduction of mechanical properties has been correlated to high translucent zirconia formualtions while regarding aging resistance, the findings are contradictory, necessitating more and thorough investigation. Despite the obvious advantages of contemporary monolithic zirconia ceramics, further scientific evidence is required that will eventually lead to the appropriate laboratory and clinical guidelines for their use. Until then, a safe suggestion should be to utilize high-strength partially-stabilized zirconia for posterior or long span restorations and fully-stabilized ultra-translucent zirconia for anterior single crowns and short span fixed partial dentures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6872834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68728342019-11-25 Strength and aging resistance of monolithic zirconia: an update to current knowledge Kontonasaki, Eleana Giasimakopoulos, Panagiotis Rigos, Athanasios E. Jpn Dent Sci Rev Article New zirconia compositions with optimized esthetic properties have emerged due to the fast-growing technology in zirconia manufacturing. However, the large variety of commercial products and synthesis routes, make impossible to include all of them under the general term of “monolithic zirconia ceramics”. Ultra- or high translucent monolithic formulations contain 3–8 mol% yttria, which results in materials with completely different structure, optical and mechanical properties. The purpose of this study was to provide an update to the current knowledge concerning monolithic zirconia and to review factors related to strength and aging resistance. Factors such as composition, coloring procedures, sintering method and temperature, may affect both strength and aging resistance to a more or less extend. A significant reduction of mechanical properties has been correlated to high translucent zirconia formualtions while regarding aging resistance, the findings are contradictory, necessitating more and thorough investigation. Despite the obvious advantages of contemporary monolithic zirconia ceramics, further scientific evidence is required that will eventually lead to the appropriate laboratory and clinical guidelines for their use. Until then, a safe suggestion should be to utilize high-strength partially-stabilized zirconia for posterior or long span restorations and fully-stabilized ultra-translucent zirconia for anterior single crowns and short span fixed partial dentures. Elsevier 2020-11 2019-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6872834/ /pubmed/31768195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2019.09.002 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kontonasaki, Eleana
Giasimakopoulos, Panagiotis
Rigos, Athanasios E.
Strength and aging resistance of monolithic zirconia: an update to current knowledge
title Strength and aging resistance of monolithic zirconia: an update to current knowledge
title_full Strength and aging resistance of monolithic zirconia: an update to current knowledge
title_fullStr Strength and aging resistance of monolithic zirconia: an update to current knowledge
title_full_unstemmed Strength and aging resistance of monolithic zirconia: an update to current knowledge
title_short Strength and aging resistance of monolithic zirconia: an update to current knowledge
title_sort strength and aging resistance of monolithic zirconia: an update to current knowledge
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6872834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31768195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2019.09.002
work_keys_str_mv AT kontonasakieleana strengthandagingresistanceofmonolithiczirconiaanupdatetocurrentknowledge
AT giasimakopoulospanagiotis strengthandagingresistanceofmonolithiczirconiaanupdatetocurrentknowledge
AT rigosathanasiose strengthandagingresistanceofmonolithiczirconiaanupdatetocurrentknowledge