Cargando…
The Personalization of Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: The personalization of conversational agents with natural language user interfaces is seeing increasing use in health care applications, shaping the content, structure, or purpose of the dialogue between humans and conversational agents. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this systematic review was...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6873147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31697237 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15360 |
_version_ | 1783472613322915840 |
---|---|
author | Kocaballi, Ahmet Baki Berkovsky, Shlomo Quiroz, Juan C Laranjo, Liliana Tong, Huong Ly Rezazadegan, Dana Briatore, Agustina Coiera, Enrico |
author_facet | Kocaballi, Ahmet Baki Berkovsky, Shlomo Quiroz, Juan C Laranjo, Liliana Tong, Huong Ly Rezazadegan, Dana Briatore, Agustina Coiera, Enrico |
author_sort | Kocaballi, Ahmet Baki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The personalization of conversational agents with natural language user interfaces is seeing increasing use in health care applications, shaping the content, structure, or purpose of the dialogue between humans and conversational agents. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this systematic review was to understand the ways in which personalization has been used with conversational agents in health care and characterize the methods of its implementation. METHODS: We searched on PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and ACM Digital Library using a predefined search strategy. The studies were included if they: (1) were primary research studies that focused on consumers, caregivers, or health care professionals; (2) involved a conversational agent with an unconstrained natural language interface; (3) tested the system with human subjects; and (4) implemented personalization features. RESULTS: The search found 1958 publications. After abstract and full-text screening, 13 studies were included in the review. Common examples of personalized content included feedback, daily health reports, alerts, warnings, and recommendations. The personalization features were implemented without a theoretical framework of customization and with limited evaluation of its impact. While conversational agents with personalization features were reported to improve user satisfaction, user engagement and dialogue quality, the role of personalization in improving health outcomes was not assessed directly. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the studies in our review implemented the personalization features without theoretical or evidence-based support for them and did not leverage the recent developments in other domains of personalization. Future research could incorporate personalization as a distinct design factor with a more careful consideration of its impact on health outcomes and its implications on patient safety, privacy, and decision-making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6873147 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68731472019-12-12 The Personalization of Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review Kocaballi, Ahmet Baki Berkovsky, Shlomo Quiroz, Juan C Laranjo, Liliana Tong, Huong Ly Rezazadegan, Dana Briatore, Agustina Coiera, Enrico J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: The personalization of conversational agents with natural language user interfaces is seeing increasing use in health care applications, shaping the content, structure, or purpose of the dialogue between humans and conversational agents. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this systematic review was to understand the ways in which personalization has been used with conversational agents in health care and characterize the methods of its implementation. METHODS: We searched on PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and ACM Digital Library using a predefined search strategy. The studies were included if they: (1) were primary research studies that focused on consumers, caregivers, or health care professionals; (2) involved a conversational agent with an unconstrained natural language interface; (3) tested the system with human subjects; and (4) implemented personalization features. RESULTS: The search found 1958 publications. After abstract and full-text screening, 13 studies were included in the review. Common examples of personalized content included feedback, daily health reports, alerts, warnings, and recommendations. The personalization features were implemented without a theoretical framework of customization and with limited evaluation of its impact. While conversational agents with personalization features were reported to improve user satisfaction, user engagement and dialogue quality, the role of personalization in improving health outcomes was not assessed directly. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the studies in our review implemented the personalization features without theoretical or evidence-based support for them and did not leverage the recent developments in other domains of personalization. Future research could incorporate personalization as a distinct design factor with a more careful consideration of its impact on health outcomes and its implications on patient safety, privacy, and decision-making. JMIR Publications 2019-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6873147/ /pubmed/31697237 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15360 Text en ©Ahmet Baki Baki Kocaballi, Shlomo Berkovsky, Juan C Quiroz, Liliana Laranjo, Huong Ly Tong, Dana Rezazadegan, Agustina Briatore, Enrico Coiera. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 07.11.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Kocaballi, Ahmet Baki Berkovsky, Shlomo Quiroz, Juan C Laranjo, Liliana Tong, Huong Ly Rezazadegan, Dana Briatore, Agustina Coiera, Enrico The Personalization of Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review |
title | The Personalization of Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review |
title_full | The Personalization of Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | The Personalization of Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Personalization of Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review |
title_short | The Personalization of Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review |
title_sort | personalization of conversational agents in health care: systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6873147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31697237 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15360 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kocaballiahmetbaki thepersonalizationofconversationalagentsinhealthcaresystematicreview AT berkovskyshlomo thepersonalizationofconversationalagentsinhealthcaresystematicreview AT quirozjuanc thepersonalizationofconversationalagentsinhealthcaresystematicreview AT laranjoliliana thepersonalizationofconversationalagentsinhealthcaresystematicreview AT tonghuongly thepersonalizationofconversationalagentsinhealthcaresystematicreview AT rezazadegandana thepersonalizationofconversationalagentsinhealthcaresystematicreview AT briatoreagustina thepersonalizationofconversationalagentsinhealthcaresystematicreview AT coieraenrico thepersonalizationofconversationalagentsinhealthcaresystematicreview AT kocaballiahmetbaki personalizationofconversationalagentsinhealthcaresystematicreview AT berkovskyshlomo personalizationofconversationalagentsinhealthcaresystematicreview AT quirozjuanc personalizationofconversationalagentsinhealthcaresystematicreview AT laranjoliliana personalizationofconversationalagentsinhealthcaresystematicreview AT tonghuongly personalizationofconversationalagentsinhealthcaresystematicreview AT rezazadegandana personalizationofconversationalagentsinhealthcaresystematicreview AT briatoreagustina personalizationofconversationalagentsinhealthcaresystematicreview AT coieraenrico personalizationofconversationalagentsinhealthcaresystematicreview |