Cargando…

Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing on positive blood cultures through an innovative light scattering technology: performances and turnaround time evaluation

BACKGROUND: A bacteremia diagnosis with speeded-up identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is mandatory to adjust empirical broad-spectrum antibiotherapy and avoid the emergence of multi-resistant bacteria. Alfred 60(AST) (Alifax, Polverara, PD, Italy) is an innovative automate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boland, Lidvine, Streel, Corentin, De Wolf, Hélène, Rodriguez, Hector, Verroken, Alexia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6873430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31752735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4623-x
_version_ 1783472655591014400
author Boland, Lidvine
Streel, Corentin
De Wolf, Hélène
Rodriguez, Hector
Verroken, Alexia
author_facet Boland, Lidvine
Streel, Corentin
De Wolf, Hélène
Rodriguez, Hector
Verroken, Alexia
author_sort Boland, Lidvine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A bacteremia diagnosis with speeded-up identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is mandatory to adjust empirical broad-spectrum antibiotherapy and avoid the emergence of multi-resistant bacteria. Alfred 60(AST) (Alifax, Polverara, PD, Italy) is an innovative automated system based on light scattering measurements allowing direct AST from positive blood cultures with rapid results. In this study we aimed to evaluate the system’s performances and turnaround time (TAT) compared to routine AST. METHODS: The study was conducted during 2 non-consecutive 3-month periods at the microbiology laboratory of the Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc. All blood cultures detected positive in the 0 AM–10 AM time frame with a pure Gram-positive cocci or Gram-negative bacilli stain were included for Alfred 60(AST) testing. Two customized EUCAST antibiotic panels were set up composed of 1) a “Gram-negative” panel including cefuroxime, ceftazidime Enterobacteriaceae, piperacillin-tazobactam Enterobacteriaceae, ciprofloxacine, and ceftazidime Pseudomonas 2) a “Gram-positive” panel including cefoxitin Staphylococcus aureus, cefoxitin coagulase-negative (CNS) Staphylococci and ampicillin Enterococci. Categorical agreement (CA), very major errors (VME), major errors (ME), minor errors (mE) and TAT to Alfred 60(AST) results were calculated in comparison with AST results obtained from direct testing on positive blood cultures with the Phoenix system (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). RESULTS: Five hundred seventy and one hundred nine antibiotics were evaluated on respectively 166 Gram-negative bacilli and 109 Gram-positive cocci included in the studied population. During the first study period regarding Gram-negative strains a CA of 89.5% was obtained with a high rate of VME (19 and 15.4% respectively) for cefuroxime and piperacillin-tazobactam Enterobacteriaceae. Considering this, Alifax reviewed these antibiotics’ formulations improving Gram-negative bacilli total CA to 92.2% with no VME during the second study period. For Gram-positive cocci, total CA was 88.1% with 2.3% VME, 13.8% ME (mainly cefoxitin CNS) and 12% mE rates both study periods combined. Median TAT to AST results was 5 h with Alfred versus 12 h34 with Phoenix. CONCLUSION: The Alfred 60(AST) system shows correct yet improvable microbiological performances and a major TAT reduction compared to direct automated AST testing. Clinical studies measuring the impact of the approach on antibiotic management of patients with bacteremia are recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6873430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68734302019-12-12 Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing on positive blood cultures through an innovative light scattering technology: performances and turnaround time evaluation Boland, Lidvine Streel, Corentin De Wolf, Hélène Rodriguez, Hector Verroken, Alexia BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: A bacteremia diagnosis with speeded-up identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is mandatory to adjust empirical broad-spectrum antibiotherapy and avoid the emergence of multi-resistant bacteria. Alfred 60(AST) (Alifax, Polverara, PD, Italy) is an innovative automated system based on light scattering measurements allowing direct AST from positive blood cultures with rapid results. In this study we aimed to evaluate the system’s performances and turnaround time (TAT) compared to routine AST. METHODS: The study was conducted during 2 non-consecutive 3-month periods at the microbiology laboratory of the Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc. All blood cultures detected positive in the 0 AM–10 AM time frame with a pure Gram-positive cocci or Gram-negative bacilli stain were included for Alfred 60(AST) testing. Two customized EUCAST antibiotic panels were set up composed of 1) a “Gram-negative” panel including cefuroxime, ceftazidime Enterobacteriaceae, piperacillin-tazobactam Enterobacteriaceae, ciprofloxacine, and ceftazidime Pseudomonas 2) a “Gram-positive” panel including cefoxitin Staphylococcus aureus, cefoxitin coagulase-negative (CNS) Staphylococci and ampicillin Enterococci. Categorical agreement (CA), very major errors (VME), major errors (ME), minor errors (mE) and TAT to Alfred 60(AST) results were calculated in comparison with AST results obtained from direct testing on positive blood cultures with the Phoenix system (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). RESULTS: Five hundred seventy and one hundred nine antibiotics were evaluated on respectively 166 Gram-negative bacilli and 109 Gram-positive cocci included in the studied population. During the first study period regarding Gram-negative strains a CA of 89.5% was obtained with a high rate of VME (19 and 15.4% respectively) for cefuroxime and piperacillin-tazobactam Enterobacteriaceae. Considering this, Alifax reviewed these antibiotics’ formulations improving Gram-negative bacilli total CA to 92.2% with no VME during the second study period. For Gram-positive cocci, total CA was 88.1% with 2.3% VME, 13.8% ME (mainly cefoxitin CNS) and 12% mE rates both study periods combined. Median TAT to AST results was 5 h with Alfred versus 12 h34 with Phoenix. CONCLUSION: The Alfred 60(AST) system shows correct yet improvable microbiological performances and a major TAT reduction compared to direct automated AST testing. Clinical studies measuring the impact of the approach on antibiotic management of patients with bacteremia are recommended. BioMed Central 2019-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6873430/ /pubmed/31752735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4623-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Boland, Lidvine
Streel, Corentin
De Wolf, Hélène
Rodriguez, Hector
Verroken, Alexia
Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing on positive blood cultures through an innovative light scattering technology: performances and turnaround time evaluation
title Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing on positive blood cultures through an innovative light scattering technology: performances and turnaround time evaluation
title_full Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing on positive blood cultures through an innovative light scattering technology: performances and turnaround time evaluation
title_fullStr Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing on positive blood cultures through an innovative light scattering technology: performances and turnaround time evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing on positive blood cultures through an innovative light scattering technology: performances and turnaround time evaluation
title_short Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing on positive blood cultures through an innovative light scattering technology: performances and turnaround time evaluation
title_sort rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing on positive blood cultures through an innovative light scattering technology: performances and turnaround time evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6873430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31752735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4623-x
work_keys_str_mv AT bolandlidvine rapidantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingonpositivebloodculturesthroughaninnovativelightscatteringtechnologyperformancesandturnaroundtimeevaluation
AT streelcorentin rapidantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingonpositivebloodculturesthroughaninnovativelightscatteringtechnologyperformancesandturnaroundtimeevaluation
AT dewolfhelene rapidantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingonpositivebloodculturesthroughaninnovativelightscatteringtechnologyperformancesandturnaroundtimeevaluation
AT rodriguezhector rapidantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingonpositivebloodculturesthroughaninnovativelightscatteringtechnologyperformancesandturnaroundtimeevaluation
AT verrokenalexia rapidantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingonpositivebloodculturesthroughaninnovativelightscatteringtechnologyperformancesandturnaroundtimeevaluation