Cargando…

The effectiveness of an interactive organ donation education intervention for Dutch lower-educated students: a cluster randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Organ donation registration rates remain low, especially among people with lower educational levels. An interactive educational intervention was developed to prepare lower-educated students in the Netherlands for making a well-informed decision about organ donation. This article reports...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steenaart, Esther, Crutzen, Rik, Candel, Math J. J. M., de Vries, Nanne K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6873467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31752975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3882-6
_version_ 1783472663235133440
author Steenaart, Esther
Crutzen, Rik
Candel, Math J. J. M.
de Vries, Nanne K.
author_facet Steenaart, Esther
Crutzen, Rik
Candel, Math J. J. M.
de Vries, Nanne K.
author_sort Steenaart, Esther
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Organ donation registration rates remain low, especially among people with lower educational levels. An interactive educational intervention was developed to prepare lower-educated students in the Netherlands for making a well-informed decision about organ donation. This article reports on the effects of this intervention on the intention to register (i.e., the primary outcome in the study at hand) and beliefs regarding organ donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The effectiveness was investigated in a post-test-only cluster randomized controlled trial, in which the intervention was offered to the experimental group and after measurement also to the control group. Randomization to the experimental and control groups took place at a class level. Teachers of schools for Intermediate Vocational Education who taught a course on Citizenship delivered three intervention elements (i.e., video fragments and discussion, quizzes with tailored feedback and exercise filling out a registration form) to their students during two 50-min lessons. RESULTS: A total of 1170 students participated in the trial and filled out a questionnaire (45 experimental and 43 control classes). Compared to the control group, students in the experimental group had higher odds of having positive registration intentions (OR = 1.81; 95%CI [1.10–2.96]), their perceived knowledge was higher (B = 0.62; 95%CI [0.23–1.01]) and they had higher intentions to talk to family members (B = 0.68; 95%CI [0.28–1.08]) and friends (B = 0.36; 95%CI [0.07–0.66]) about organ donation. There were no effects on the choice students intended to register (OR = 1.08; 95%CI [0.67–1.73]). CONCLUSIONS: Providing education in a classroom setting is an effective tool in increasing registration intentions. Despite uncertainties about the effects on actual registration behavior, a larger-scale dissemination of this intervention is recommended. Providing clear information and opening the discussion about organ donation is an important and promising first step towards higher registration rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Dutch Trial Register, ID: NTR6771. Registered on 24 October 2017. https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6557
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6873467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68734672019-12-12 The effectiveness of an interactive organ donation education intervention for Dutch lower-educated students: a cluster randomized controlled trial Steenaart, Esther Crutzen, Rik Candel, Math J. J. M. de Vries, Nanne K. Trials Research BACKGROUND: Organ donation registration rates remain low, especially among people with lower educational levels. An interactive educational intervention was developed to prepare lower-educated students in the Netherlands for making a well-informed decision about organ donation. This article reports on the effects of this intervention on the intention to register (i.e., the primary outcome in the study at hand) and beliefs regarding organ donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The effectiveness was investigated in a post-test-only cluster randomized controlled trial, in which the intervention was offered to the experimental group and after measurement also to the control group. Randomization to the experimental and control groups took place at a class level. Teachers of schools for Intermediate Vocational Education who taught a course on Citizenship delivered three intervention elements (i.e., video fragments and discussion, quizzes with tailored feedback and exercise filling out a registration form) to their students during two 50-min lessons. RESULTS: A total of 1170 students participated in the trial and filled out a questionnaire (45 experimental and 43 control classes). Compared to the control group, students in the experimental group had higher odds of having positive registration intentions (OR = 1.81; 95%CI [1.10–2.96]), their perceived knowledge was higher (B = 0.62; 95%CI [0.23–1.01]) and they had higher intentions to talk to family members (B = 0.68; 95%CI [0.28–1.08]) and friends (B = 0.36; 95%CI [0.07–0.66]) about organ donation. There were no effects on the choice students intended to register (OR = 1.08; 95%CI [0.67–1.73]). CONCLUSIONS: Providing education in a classroom setting is an effective tool in increasing registration intentions. Despite uncertainties about the effects on actual registration behavior, a larger-scale dissemination of this intervention is recommended. Providing clear information and opening the discussion about organ donation is an important and promising first step towards higher registration rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Dutch Trial Register, ID: NTR6771. Registered on 24 October 2017. https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6557 BioMed Central 2019-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6873467/ /pubmed/31752975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3882-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Steenaart, Esther
Crutzen, Rik
Candel, Math J. J. M.
de Vries, Nanne K.
The effectiveness of an interactive organ donation education intervention for Dutch lower-educated students: a cluster randomized controlled trial
title The effectiveness of an interactive organ donation education intervention for Dutch lower-educated students: a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full The effectiveness of an interactive organ donation education intervention for Dutch lower-educated students: a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The effectiveness of an interactive organ donation education intervention for Dutch lower-educated students: a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of an interactive organ donation education intervention for Dutch lower-educated students: a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_short The effectiveness of an interactive organ donation education intervention for Dutch lower-educated students: a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of an interactive organ donation education intervention for dutch lower-educated students: a cluster randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6873467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31752975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3882-6
work_keys_str_mv AT steenaartesther theeffectivenessofaninteractiveorgandonationeducationinterventionfordutchlowereducatedstudentsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT crutzenrik theeffectivenessofaninteractiveorgandonationeducationinterventionfordutchlowereducatedstudentsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT candelmathjjm theeffectivenessofaninteractiveorgandonationeducationinterventionfordutchlowereducatedstudentsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT devriesnannek theeffectivenessofaninteractiveorgandonationeducationinterventionfordutchlowereducatedstudentsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT steenaartesther effectivenessofaninteractiveorgandonationeducationinterventionfordutchlowereducatedstudentsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT crutzenrik effectivenessofaninteractiveorgandonationeducationinterventionfordutchlowereducatedstudentsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT candelmathjjm effectivenessofaninteractiveorgandonationeducationinterventionfordutchlowereducatedstudentsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT devriesnannek effectivenessofaninteractiveorgandonationeducationinterventionfordutchlowereducatedstudentsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial