Cargando…

Cone beam CT for perioperative imaging in hearing preservation Cochlear implantation – a human cadaveric study

BACKGROUND: 1. Validate CBCT by measuring cochlear metrics, including basal turn diameter (A-value) and lateral wall cochlear duct length at different angular intervals and comparing it against microcomputed CT (uCT). 2. Explore the relationship between measured lateral wall cochlear duct length at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nateghifard, Kayvan, Low, David, Awofala, Lola, Srikanthan, Dilakshan, Kuthubutheen, Jafri, Daly, Michael, Chan, Harley, Irish, Jonathan, Chen, Joseph, Lin, Vincent, Le, Trung Ngoc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6873551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31753027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-019-0388-x
_version_ 1783472685155614720
author Nateghifard, Kayvan
Low, David
Awofala, Lola
Srikanthan, Dilakshan
Kuthubutheen, Jafri
Daly, Michael
Chan, Harley
Irish, Jonathan
Chen, Joseph
Lin, Vincent
Le, Trung Ngoc
author_facet Nateghifard, Kayvan
Low, David
Awofala, Lola
Srikanthan, Dilakshan
Kuthubutheen, Jafri
Daly, Michael
Chan, Harley
Irish, Jonathan
Chen, Joseph
Lin, Vincent
Le, Trung Ngoc
author_sort Nateghifard, Kayvan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: 1. Validate CBCT by measuring cochlear metrics, including basal turn diameter (A-value) and lateral wall cochlear duct length at different angular intervals and comparing it against microcomputed CT (uCT). 2. Explore the relationship between measured lateral wall cochlear duct length at different angular intervals and insertion depth among 3 different length electrodes using CBCT. METHODS: The study was performed using fixed human cadaveric temporal bones in a tertiary academic centre. Ten temporal bones were subjected to the standard facial recess approach for cochlear implantation and imaged by CBCT followed by uCT. Measurements were performed on a three-dimensional reconstructed model of the cochlea. Sequential insertion of 3 electrodes (Med-El Flex24, 28 and Soft) was then performed in 5 bones and reimaged by CBCT. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson’s correlation. RESULTS: There was good agreement between CBCT and uCT for cochlear metrics, validating the precision of CBCT against the current gold standard uCT in imaging. The A-value recorded by both modalities showed a high degree of linear correlation and did not differ by more than 0.23 mm in absolute values. For the measurement of lateral wall CDL at various points along the cochlea, there was a good correlation between both modalities at 360 deg and 720 deg (r = 0.85, p < 0.01 and r = 0.79, p < 0.01). The Flex24 electrode displayed consistent insertion depth across different bones. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT reliably performs cochlear metrics and measures electrode insertion depth. The low radiation dose, fast acquisition time, diminished metallic artifacts and portability of CBCT make it a valid option for imaging in cochlear implant surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6873551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68735512019-11-25 Cone beam CT for perioperative imaging in hearing preservation Cochlear implantation – a human cadaveric study Nateghifard, Kayvan Low, David Awofala, Lola Srikanthan, Dilakshan Kuthubutheen, Jafri Daly, Michael Chan, Harley Irish, Jonathan Chen, Joseph Lin, Vincent Le, Trung Ngoc J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: 1. Validate CBCT by measuring cochlear metrics, including basal turn diameter (A-value) and lateral wall cochlear duct length at different angular intervals and comparing it against microcomputed CT (uCT). 2. Explore the relationship between measured lateral wall cochlear duct length at different angular intervals and insertion depth among 3 different length electrodes using CBCT. METHODS: The study was performed using fixed human cadaveric temporal bones in a tertiary academic centre. Ten temporal bones were subjected to the standard facial recess approach for cochlear implantation and imaged by CBCT followed by uCT. Measurements were performed on a three-dimensional reconstructed model of the cochlea. Sequential insertion of 3 electrodes (Med-El Flex24, 28 and Soft) was then performed in 5 bones and reimaged by CBCT. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson’s correlation. RESULTS: There was good agreement between CBCT and uCT for cochlear metrics, validating the precision of CBCT against the current gold standard uCT in imaging. The A-value recorded by both modalities showed a high degree of linear correlation and did not differ by more than 0.23 mm in absolute values. For the measurement of lateral wall CDL at various points along the cochlea, there was a good correlation between both modalities at 360 deg and 720 deg (r = 0.85, p < 0.01 and r = 0.79, p < 0.01). The Flex24 electrode displayed consistent insertion depth across different bones. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT reliably performs cochlear metrics and measures electrode insertion depth. The low radiation dose, fast acquisition time, diminished metallic artifacts and portability of CBCT make it a valid option for imaging in cochlear implant surgery. BioMed Central 2019-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6873551/ /pubmed/31753027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-019-0388-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Nateghifard, Kayvan
Low, David
Awofala, Lola
Srikanthan, Dilakshan
Kuthubutheen, Jafri
Daly, Michael
Chan, Harley
Irish, Jonathan
Chen, Joseph
Lin, Vincent
Le, Trung Ngoc
Cone beam CT for perioperative imaging in hearing preservation Cochlear implantation – a human cadaveric study
title Cone beam CT for perioperative imaging in hearing preservation Cochlear implantation – a human cadaveric study
title_full Cone beam CT for perioperative imaging in hearing preservation Cochlear implantation – a human cadaveric study
title_fullStr Cone beam CT for perioperative imaging in hearing preservation Cochlear implantation – a human cadaveric study
title_full_unstemmed Cone beam CT for perioperative imaging in hearing preservation Cochlear implantation – a human cadaveric study
title_short Cone beam CT for perioperative imaging in hearing preservation Cochlear implantation – a human cadaveric study
title_sort cone beam ct for perioperative imaging in hearing preservation cochlear implantation – a human cadaveric study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6873551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31753027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-019-0388-x
work_keys_str_mv AT nateghifardkayvan conebeamctforperioperativeimaginginhearingpreservationcochlearimplantationahumancadavericstudy
AT lowdavid conebeamctforperioperativeimaginginhearingpreservationcochlearimplantationahumancadavericstudy
AT awofalalola conebeamctforperioperativeimaginginhearingpreservationcochlearimplantationahumancadavericstudy
AT srikanthandilakshan conebeamctforperioperativeimaginginhearingpreservationcochlearimplantationahumancadavericstudy
AT kuthubutheenjafri conebeamctforperioperativeimaginginhearingpreservationcochlearimplantationahumancadavericstudy
AT dalymichael conebeamctforperioperativeimaginginhearingpreservationcochlearimplantationahumancadavericstudy
AT chanharley conebeamctforperioperativeimaginginhearingpreservationcochlearimplantationahumancadavericstudy
AT irishjonathan conebeamctforperioperativeimaginginhearingpreservationcochlearimplantationahumancadavericstudy
AT chenjoseph conebeamctforperioperativeimaginginhearingpreservationcochlearimplantationahumancadavericstudy
AT linvincent conebeamctforperioperativeimaginginhearingpreservationcochlearimplantationahumancadavericstudy
AT letrungngoc conebeamctforperioperativeimaginginhearingpreservationcochlearimplantationahumancadavericstudy