Cargando…

The marginal discrepancy of lithium disilicate onlays: Computer-aided design versus press

AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the vertical marginal discrepancy of computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) and pressable lithium disilicate onlays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A maxillary first premolar typodont tooth was prepared to receive lithium disilica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gudugunta, Leneena, Mynampati, Praffulla, Jeevan, Matada Basavarajaiah, Kumar, Sathiyavathi Mahendra, Akkaloori, Anitha, Tejavath, Sai Krishna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6873597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31802815
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_31_19
_version_ 1783472697070583808
author Gudugunta, Leneena
Mynampati, Praffulla
Jeevan, Matada Basavarajaiah
Kumar, Sathiyavathi Mahendra
Akkaloori, Anitha
Tejavath, Sai Krishna
author_facet Gudugunta, Leneena
Mynampati, Praffulla
Jeevan, Matada Basavarajaiah
Kumar, Sathiyavathi Mahendra
Akkaloori, Anitha
Tejavath, Sai Krishna
author_sort Gudugunta, Leneena
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the vertical marginal discrepancy of computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) and pressable lithium disilicate onlays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A maxillary first premolar typodont tooth was prepared to receive lithium disilicate onlay. Mesio-occluso-distal cavity was prepared with palatal cusp reduction and collar preparation. In the proximal box, gingival seat was placed 1 mm coronal to the cementoenamel junction and mesiodistal width of the seat was kept to 1 mm. Thirty stone models were prepared from thirty rubber base impressions and divided into two groups, based on the technique of fabrication of onlays: (1) Group CL (CAD/CAM lithium disilicate) and (2) Group PL (Pressable lithium disilicate). Fifteen onlays per each group were fabricated by following the manufacturer instructions. Marginal fit of all the samples were analyzed by using stereomicroscope with Image Analysis software. Statistical analysis was done by t-test. RESULTS: Statistical significant difference was found between both the groups. The lowest marginal discrepancy (41.46 μm) was measured for Group CL (CAD/CAM lithium disilicate) specimens, and the highest (55.95 μm) discrepancy was observed on the Group PL (Pressable lithium disilicate) specimens. CONCLUSION: Although there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups, marginal gap of both the groups were in clinically acceptable levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6873597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68735972019-12-04 The marginal discrepancy of lithium disilicate onlays: Computer-aided design versus press Gudugunta, Leneena Mynampati, Praffulla Jeevan, Matada Basavarajaiah Kumar, Sathiyavathi Mahendra Akkaloori, Anitha Tejavath, Sai Krishna J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the vertical marginal discrepancy of computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) and pressable lithium disilicate onlays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A maxillary first premolar typodont tooth was prepared to receive lithium disilicate onlay. Mesio-occluso-distal cavity was prepared with palatal cusp reduction and collar preparation. In the proximal box, gingival seat was placed 1 mm coronal to the cementoenamel junction and mesiodistal width of the seat was kept to 1 mm. Thirty stone models were prepared from thirty rubber base impressions and divided into two groups, based on the technique of fabrication of onlays: (1) Group CL (CAD/CAM lithium disilicate) and (2) Group PL (Pressable lithium disilicate). Fifteen onlays per each group were fabricated by following the manufacturer instructions. Marginal fit of all the samples were analyzed by using stereomicroscope with Image Analysis software. Statistical analysis was done by t-test. RESULTS: Statistical significant difference was found between both the groups. The lowest marginal discrepancy (41.46 μm) was measured for Group CL (CAD/CAM lithium disilicate) specimens, and the highest (55.95 μm) discrepancy was observed on the Group PL (Pressable lithium disilicate) specimens. CONCLUSION: Although there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups, marginal gap of both the groups were in clinically acceptable levels. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6873597/ /pubmed/31802815 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_31_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gudugunta, Leneena
Mynampati, Praffulla
Jeevan, Matada Basavarajaiah
Kumar, Sathiyavathi Mahendra
Akkaloori, Anitha
Tejavath, Sai Krishna
The marginal discrepancy of lithium disilicate onlays: Computer-aided design versus press
title The marginal discrepancy of lithium disilicate onlays: Computer-aided design versus press
title_full The marginal discrepancy of lithium disilicate onlays: Computer-aided design versus press
title_fullStr The marginal discrepancy of lithium disilicate onlays: Computer-aided design versus press
title_full_unstemmed The marginal discrepancy of lithium disilicate onlays: Computer-aided design versus press
title_short The marginal discrepancy of lithium disilicate onlays: Computer-aided design versus press
title_sort marginal discrepancy of lithium disilicate onlays: computer-aided design versus press
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6873597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31802815
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_31_19
work_keys_str_mv AT guduguntaleneena themarginaldiscrepancyoflithiumdisilicateonlayscomputeraideddesignversuspress
AT mynampatipraffulla themarginaldiscrepancyoflithiumdisilicateonlayscomputeraideddesignversuspress
AT jeevanmatadabasavarajaiah themarginaldiscrepancyoflithiumdisilicateonlayscomputeraideddesignversuspress
AT kumarsathiyavathimahendra themarginaldiscrepancyoflithiumdisilicateonlayscomputeraideddesignversuspress
AT akkaloorianitha themarginaldiscrepancyoflithiumdisilicateonlayscomputeraideddesignversuspress
AT tejavathsaikrishna themarginaldiscrepancyoflithiumdisilicateonlayscomputeraideddesignversuspress
AT guduguntaleneena marginaldiscrepancyoflithiumdisilicateonlayscomputeraideddesignversuspress
AT mynampatipraffulla marginaldiscrepancyoflithiumdisilicateonlayscomputeraideddesignversuspress
AT jeevanmatadabasavarajaiah marginaldiscrepancyoflithiumdisilicateonlayscomputeraideddesignversuspress
AT kumarsathiyavathimahendra marginaldiscrepancyoflithiumdisilicateonlayscomputeraideddesignversuspress
AT akkaloorianitha marginaldiscrepancyoflithiumdisilicateonlayscomputeraideddesignversuspress
AT tejavathsaikrishna marginaldiscrepancyoflithiumdisilicateonlayscomputeraideddesignversuspress