Cargando…

Comparison of four commercially available ELISA kits for diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in Irish cattle

BACKGROUND: Fasciola hepatica is a liver parasite of mammals and it results in poor welfare outcomes and economic losses in ruminants. While faecal egg count is the test most commonly used for diagnosis, it does not indicate presence of migrating immature stages. Serological techniques increase sens...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munita, Maria Pia, Rea, Rosemary, Martinez-Ibeas, Ana Maria, Byrne, Noel, Kennedy, Aideen, Sekiya, Mary, Mulcahy, Grace, Sayers, Riona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6873750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31752880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2160-x
_version_ 1783472728885428224
author Munita, Maria Pia
Rea, Rosemary
Martinez-Ibeas, Ana Maria
Byrne, Noel
Kennedy, Aideen
Sekiya, Mary
Mulcahy, Grace
Sayers, Riona
author_facet Munita, Maria Pia
Rea, Rosemary
Martinez-Ibeas, Ana Maria
Byrne, Noel
Kennedy, Aideen
Sekiya, Mary
Mulcahy, Grace
Sayers, Riona
author_sort Munita, Maria Pia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fasciola hepatica is a liver parasite of mammals and it results in poor welfare outcomes and economic losses in ruminants. While faecal egg count is the test most commonly used for diagnosis, it does not indicate presence of migrating immature stages. Serological techniques increase sensitivity at all stages of the liver fluke infection. The aim of this study was to compare four commercially available ELISA tests for the diagnosis of F. hepatica. For this purpose, we tested three sample types; (i) known F. hepatica status sera from an experimental infection for the comparison of sensitivities and specificities, (ii) sera from pre- and post-flukicide-treated (albendazole, closantel, nitroxynil and triclabendazole) beef cattle to contrast the differences of seropositivity before and after treatment, and (iii) bulk tank milk samples from dairy herds sampled during high and low F. hepatica exposure periods for assessing seasonal variations with the four tests available. Samples were tested using ELISA kits supplied by four manufacturers (Ildana Biotech, IDEXX, Svanova, and Bio-X). Samples were analysed simultaneously and in duplicate. RESULTS: In the control population Ildana, IDEXX and Bio-X presented 100% sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp), Svanovir presented a Se of 59% and a Sp of 96%. In flukicide-treated beef cattle, kits highlighted decreasing antibody levels 90 days post-treatment in variable degrees. Finally, bulk milk showed a significant decrease in ELISA value between high and low fluke exposure periods with all tests studied. CONCLUSIONS: Se and Sp found in the present study, confirm that Ildana, IDEXX and Bio-X are accurate for the detection of F. hepatica exposure in Irish cattle. Svanovir Se and Sp in this population, indicate that a larger study is necessary to confirm this test characteristic in Irish herds. In post-treatment use, Bio-X showed a consistent and significant decrease of ELISA value in all groups treated, denoting to be a reliable tool for assessing treatment effect at 90 days post-treatment. Finally, all tests showed to be a reliable tool for the F. hepatica monitoring of high and low exposure seasons, using bulk tank milk samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6873750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68737502019-11-25 Comparison of four commercially available ELISA kits for diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in Irish cattle Munita, Maria Pia Rea, Rosemary Martinez-Ibeas, Ana Maria Byrne, Noel Kennedy, Aideen Sekiya, Mary Mulcahy, Grace Sayers, Riona BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Fasciola hepatica is a liver parasite of mammals and it results in poor welfare outcomes and economic losses in ruminants. While faecal egg count is the test most commonly used for diagnosis, it does not indicate presence of migrating immature stages. Serological techniques increase sensitivity at all stages of the liver fluke infection. The aim of this study was to compare four commercially available ELISA tests for the diagnosis of F. hepatica. For this purpose, we tested three sample types; (i) known F. hepatica status sera from an experimental infection for the comparison of sensitivities and specificities, (ii) sera from pre- and post-flukicide-treated (albendazole, closantel, nitroxynil and triclabendazole) beef cattle to contrast the differences of seropositivity before and after treatment, and (iii) bulk tank milk samples from dairy herds sampled during high and low F. hepatica exposure periods for assessing seasonal variations with the four tests available. Samples were tested using ELISA kits supplied by four manufacturers (Ildana Biotech, IDEXX, Svanova, and Bio-X). Samples were analysed simultaneously and in duplicate. RESULTS: In the control population Ildana, IDEXX and Bio-X presented 100% sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp), Svanovir presented a Se of 59% and a Sp of 96%. In flukicide-treated beef cattle, kits highlighted decreasing antibody levels 90 days post-treatment in variable degrees. Finally, bulk milk showed a significant decrease in ELISA value between high and low fluke exposure periods with all tests studied. CONCLUSIONS: Se and Sp found in the present study, confirm that Ildana, IDEXX and Bio-X are accurate for the detection of F. hepatica exposure in Irish cattle. Svanovir Se and Sp in this population, indicate that a larger study is necessary to confirm this test characteristic in Irish herds. In post-treatment use, Bio-X showed a consistent and significant decrease of ELISA value in all groups treated, denoting to be a reliable tool for assessing treatment effect at 90 days post-treatment. Finally, all tests showed to be a reliable tool for the F. hepatica monitoring of high and low exposure seasons, using bulk tank milk samples. BioMed Central 2019-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6873750/ /pubmed/31752880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2160-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Munita, Maria Pia
Rea, Rosemary
Martinez-Ibeas, Ana Maria
Byrne, Noel
Kennedy, Aideen
Sekiya, Mary
Mulcahy, Grace
Sayers, Riona
Comparison of four commercially available ELISA kits for diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in Irish cattle
title Comparison of four commercially available ELISA kits for diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in Irish cattle
title_full Comparison of four commercially available ELISA kits for diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in Irish cattle
title_fullStr Comparison of four commercially available ELISA kits for diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in Irish cattle
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of four commercially available ELISA kits for diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in Irish cattle
title_short Comparison of four commercially available ELISA kits for diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in Irish cattle
title_sort comparison of four commercially available elisa kits for diagnosis of fasciola hepatica in irish cattle
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6873750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31752880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2160-x
work_keys_str_mv AT munitamariapia comparisonoffourcommerciallyavailableelisakitsfordiagnosisoffasciolahepaticainirishcattle
AT rearosemary comparisonoffourcommerciallyavailableelisakitsfordiagnosisoffasciolahepaticainirishcattle
AT martinezibeasanamaria comparisonoffourcommerciallyavailableelisakitsfordiagnosisoffasciolahepaticainirishcattle
AT byrnenoel comparisonoffourcommerciallyavailableelisakitsfordiagnosisoffasciolahepaticainirishcattle
AT kennedyaideen comparisonoffourcommerciallyavailableelisakitsfordiagnosisoffasciolahepaticainirishcattle
AT sekiyamary comparisonoffourcommerciallyavailableelisakitsfordiagnosisoffasciolahepaticainirishcattle
AT mulcahygrace comparisonoffourcommerciallyavailableelisakitsfordiagnosisoffasciolahepaticainirishcattle
AT sayersriona comparisonoffourcommerciallyavailableelisakitsfordiagnosisoffasciolahepaticainirishcattle