Cargando…
Predictive Values of MRI and PET Derived Quantitative Parameters for Patterns of Failure in Both p16+ and p16– High Risk Head and Neck Cancer
Purpose: FDG-PET adds to clinical factors, such tumor stage and p16 status, in predicting local (LF), regional (RF), and distant failure (DF) in poor prognosis locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with chemoradiation. We hypothesized that MRI-based quantitative imaging (QI) metrics co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6874128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31799173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01118 |
_version_ | 1783472780321226752 |
---|---|
author | Cao, Yue Aryal, Madhava Li, Pin Lee, Choonik Schipper, Matthew Hawkins, Peter G. Chapman, Christina Owen, Dawn Dragovic, Aleksandar F. Swiecicki, Paul Casper, Keith Worden, Francis Lawrence, Theodore S. Eisbruch, Avraham Mierzwa, Michelle |
author_facet | Cao, Yue Aryal, Madhava Li, Pin Lee, Choonik Schipper, Matthew Hawkins, Peter G. Chapman, Christina Owen, Dawn Dragovic, Aleksandar F. Swiecicki, Paul Casper, Keith Worden, Francis Lawrence, Theodore S. Eisbruch, Avraham Mierzwa, Michelle |
author_sort | Cao, Yue |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: FDG-PET adds to clinical factors, such tumor stage and p16 status, in predicting local (LF), regional (RF), and distant failure (DF) in poor prognosis locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with chemoradiation. We hypothesized that MRI-based quantitative imaging (QI) metrics could add to clinical predictors of treatment failure more significantly than FDG-PET metrics. Materials and methods: Fifty four patients with poor prognosis HNCs who were enrolled in an IRB approved prospective adaptive chemoradiotherapy trial were analyzed. MRI-derived gross tumor volume (GTV), blood volume (BV), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) pre-treatment and mid-treatment (fraction 10), as well as pre-treatment FDG PET metrics, were analyzed in primary and individual nodal tumors. Cox proportional hazards models for prediction of LRF and DF free survival were used to test the additional value of QI metrics over dominant clinical predictors. Results: The mean ADC pre-RT and its change rate mid-treatment were significantly higher and lower in p16– than p16+ primary tumors, respectively. A Cox model identified that high mean ADC pre-RT had a high hazard for LF and RF in p16– but not p16+ tumors (p = 0.015). Most interesting, persisting subvolumes of low BV (TV(bv)) in primary and nodal tumors mid-treatment had high-risk for DF (p < 0.05). Also, total nodal GTV mid-treatment, mean/max SUV of FDG in all nodal tumors, and total nodal TLG were predictive for DF (p < 0.05). When including clinical stage (T4/N3) and total nodal GTV in the model, all nodal PET parameters had a p-value of >0.3, and only TV(bv) of primary tumors had a p-value of 0.06. Conclusion: MRI-defined biomarkers, especially persisting subvolumes of low BV, add predictive value to clinical variables and compare favorably with FDG-PET imaging markers. MRI could be well-integrated into the radiation therapy workflow for treatment planning, response assessment, and adaptive therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6874128 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68741282019-12-03 Predictive Values of MRI and PET Derived Quantitative Parameters for Patterns of Failure in Both p16+ and p16– High Risk Head and Neck Cancer Cao, Yue Aryal, Madhava Li, Pin Lee, Choonik Schipper, Matthew Hawkins, Peter G. Chapman, Christina Owen, Dawn Dragovic, Aleksandar F. Swiecicki, Paul Casper, Keith Worden, Francis Lawrence, Theodore S. Eisbruch, Avraham Mierzwa, Michelle Front Oncol Oncology Purpose: FDG-PET adds to clinical factors, such tumor stage and p16 status, in predicting local (LF), regional (RF), and distant failure (DF) in poor prognosis locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with chemoradiation. We hypothesized that MRI-based quantitative imaging (QI) metrics could add to clinical predictors of treatment failure more significantly than FDG-PET metrics. Materials and methods: Fifty four patients with poor prognosis HNCs who were enrolled in an IRB approved prospective adaptive chemoradiotherapy trial were analyzed. MRI-derived gross tumor volume (GTV), blood volume (BV), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) pre-treatment and mid-treatment (fraction 10), as well as pre-treatment FDG PET metrics, were analyzed in primary and individual nodal tumors. Cox proportional hazards models for prediction of LRF and DF free survival were used to test the additional value of QI metrics over dominant clinical predictors. Results: The mean ADC pre-RT and its change rate mid-treatment were significantly higher and lower in p16– than p16+ primary tumors, respectively. A Cox model identified that high mean ADC pre-RT had a high hazard for LF and RF in p16– but not p16+ tumors (p = 0.015). Most interesting, persisting subvolumes of low BV (TV(bv)) in primary and nodal tumors mid-treatment had high-risk for DF (p < 0.05). Also, total nodal GTV mid-treatment, mean/max SUV of FDG in all nodal tumors, and total nodal TLG were predictive for DF (p < 0.05). When including clinical stage (T4/N3) and total nodal GTV in the model, all nodal PET parameters had a p-value of >0.3, and only TV(bv) of primary tumors had a p-value of 0.06. Conclusion: MRI-defined biomarkers, especially persisting subvolumes of low BV, add predictive value to clinical variables and compare favorably with FDG-PET imaging markers. MRI could be well-integrated into the radiation therapy workflow for treatment planning, response assessment, and adaptive therapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6874128/ /pubmed/31799173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01118 Text en Copyright © 2019 Cao, Aryal, Li, Lee, Schipper, Hawkins, Chapman, Owen, Dragovic, Swiecicki, Casper, Worden, Lawrence, Eisbruch and Mierzwa. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Cao, Yue Aryal, Madhava Li, Pin Lee, Choonik Schipper, Matthew Hawkins, Peter G. Chapman, Christina Owen, Dawn Dragovic, Aleksandar F. Swiecicki, Paul Casper, Keith Worden, Francis Lawrence, Theodore S. Eisbruch, Avraham Mierzwa, Michelle Predictive Values of MRI and PET Derived Quantitative Parameters for Patterns of Failure in Both p16+ and p16– High Risk Head and Neck Cancer |
title | Predictive Values of MRI and PET Derived Quantitative Parameters for Patterns of Failure in Both p16+ and p16– High Risk Head and Neck Cancer |
title_full | Predictive Values of MRI and PET Derived Quantitative Parameters for Patterns of Failure in Both p16+ and p16– High Risk Head and Neck Cancer |
title_fullStr | Predictive Values of MRI and PET Derived Quantitative Parameters for Patterns of Failure in Both p16+ and p16– High Risk Head and Neck Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictive Values of MRI and PET Derived Quantitative Parameters for Patterns of Failure in Both p16+ and p16– High Risk Head and Neck Cancer |
title_short | Predictive Values of MRI and PET Derived Quantitative Parameters for Patterns of Failure in Both p16+ and p16– High Risk Head and Neck Cancer |
title_sort | predictive values of mri and pet derived quantitative parameters for patterns of failure in both p16+ and p16– high risk head and neck cancer |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6874128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31799173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caoyue predictivevaluesofmriandpetderivedquantitativeparametersforpatternsoffailureinbothp16andp16highriskheadandneckcancer AT aryalmadhava predictivevaluesofmriandpetderivedquantitativeparametersforpatternsoffailureinbothp16andp16highriskheadandneckcancer AT lipin predictivevaluesofmriandpetderivedquantitativeparametersforpatternsoffailureinbothp16andp16highriskheadandneckcancer AT leechoonik predictivevaluesofmriandpetderivedquantitativeparametersforpatternsoffailureinbothp16andp16highriskheadandneckcancer AT schippermatthew predictivevaluesofmriandpetderivedquantitativeparametersforpatternsoffailureinbothp16andp16highriskheadandneckcancer AT hawkinspeterg predictivevaluesofmriandpetderivedquantitativeparametersforpatternsoffailureinbothp16andp16highriskheadandneckcancer AT chapmanchristina predictivevaluesofmriandpetderivedquantitativeparametersforpatternsoffailureinbothp16andp16highriskheadandneckcancer AT owendawn predictivevaluesofmriandpetderivedquantitativeparametersforpatternsoffailureinbothp16andp16highriskheadandneckcancer AT dragovicaleksandarf predictivevaluesofmriandpetderivedquantitativeparametersforpatternsoffailureinbothp16andp16highriskheadandneckcancer AT swiecickipaul predictivevaluesofmriandpetderivedquantitativeparametersforpatternsoffailureinbothp16andp16highriskheadandneckcancer AT casperkeith predictivevaluesofmriandpetderivedquantitativeparametersforpatternsoffailureinbothp16andp16highriskheadandneckcancer AT wordenfrancis predictivevaluesofmriandpetderivedquantitativeparametersforpatternsoffailureinbothp16andp16highriskheadandneckcancer AT lawrencetheodores predictivevaluesofmriandpetderivedquantitativeparametersforpatternsoffailureinbothp16andp16highriskheadandneckcancer AT eisbruchavraham predictivevaluesofmriandpetderivedquantitativeparametersforpatternsoffailureinbothp16andp16highriskheadandneckcancer AT mierzwamichelle predictivevaluesofmriandpetderivedquantitativeparametersforpatternsoffailureinbothp16andp16highriskheadandneckcancer |