Cargando…
Prognostic performance of computerized tomography scoring systems in civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury: an observational study
BACKGROUND: The prognosis of penetrating traumatic brain injury (pTBI) is poor yet highly variable. Current computerized tomography (CT) severity scores are commonly not used for pTBI prognostication but may provide important clinical information in these cohorts. METHODS: All consecutive pTBI patie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6874621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31659439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04074-1 |
_version_ | 1783472874857693184 |
---|---|
author | Lindfors, Matias Lindblad, Caroline Nelson, David W. Bellander, Bo-Michael Siironen, Jari Raj, Rahul Thelin, Eric P. |
author_facet | Lindfors, Matias Lindblad, Caroline Nelson, David W. Bellander, Bo-Michael Siironen, Jari Raj, Rahul Thelin, Eric P. |
author_sort | Lindfors, Matias |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The prognosis of penetrating traumatic brain injury (pTBI) is poor yet highly variable. Current computerized tomography (CT) severity scores are commonly not used for pTBI prognostication but may provide important clinical information in these cohorts. METHODS: All consecutive pTBI patients from two large neurotrauma databases (Helsinki 1999–2015, Stockholm 2005–2014) were included. Outcome measures were 6-month mortality and unfavorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale 1–3). Admission head CT scans were assessed according to the following: Marshall CT classification, Rotterdam CT score, Stockholm CT score, and Helsinki CT score. The discrimination (area under the receiver operating curve, AUC) and explanatory variance (pseudo-R(2)) of the CT scores were assessed individually and in addition to a base model including age, motor response, and pupil responsiveness. RESULTS: Altogether, 75 patients were included. Overall 6-month mortality and unfavorable outcome were 45% and 61% for all patients, and 31% and 51% for actively treated patients. The CT scores’ AUCs and pseudo-R(2)s varied between 0.77–0.90 and 0.35–0.60 for mortality prediction and between 0.85–0.89 and 0.50–0.57 for unfavorable outcome prediction. The base model showed excellent performance for mortality (AUC 0.94, pseudo-R(2) 0.71) and unfavorable outcome (AUC 0.89, pseudo-R(2) 0.53) prediction. None of the CT scores increased the base model’s AUC (p > 0.05) yet increased its pseudo-R(2) (0.09–0.15) for unfavorable outcome prediction. CONCLUSION: Existing head CT scores demonstrate good-to-excellent performance in 6-month outcome prediction in pTBI patients. However, they do not add independent information to known outcome predictors, indicating that a unique score capturing the intracranial severity in pTBI may be warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-019-04074-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6874621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68746212019-12-06 Prognostic performance of computerized tomography scoring systems in civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury: an observational study Lindfors, Matias Lindblad, Caroline Nelson, David W. Bellander, Bo-Michael Siironen, Jari Raj, Rahul Thelin, Eric P. Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article - Brain trauma BACKGROUND: The prognosis of penetrating traumatic brain injury (pTBI) is poor yet highly variable. Current computerized tomography (CT) severity scores are commonly not used for pTBI prognostication but may provide important clinical information in these cohorts. METHODS: All consecutive pTBI patients from two large neurotrauma databases (Helsinki 1999–2015, Stockholm 2005–2014) were included. Outcome measures were 6-month mortality and unfavorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale 1–3). Admission head CT scans were assessed according to the following: Marshall CT classification, Rotterdam CT score, Stockholm CT score, and Helsinki CT score. The discrimination (area under the receiver operating curve, AUC) and explanatory variance (pseudo-R(2)) of the CT scores were assessed individually and in addition to a base model including age, motor response, and pupil responsiveness. RESULTS: Altogether, 75 patients were included. Overall 6-month mortality and unfavorable outcome were 45% and 61% for all patients, and 31% and 51% for actively treated patients. The CT scores’ AUCs and pseudo-R(2)s varied between 0.77–0.90 and 0.35–0.60 for mortality prediction and between 0.85–0.89 and 0.50–0.57 for unfavorable outcome prediction. The base model showed excellent performance for mortality (AUC 0.94, pseudo-R(2) 0.71) and unfavorable outcome (AUC 0.89, pseudo-R(2) 0.53) prediction. None of the CT scores increased the base model’s AUC (p > 0.05) yet increased its pseudo-R(2) (0.09–0.15) for unfavorable outcome prediction. CONCLUSION: Existing head CT scores demonstrate good-to-excellent performance in 6-month outcome prediction in pTBI patients. However, they do not add independent information to known outcome predictors, indicating that a unique score capturing the intracranial severity in pTBI may be warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-019-04074-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Vienna 2019-10-28 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6874621/ /pubmed/31659439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04074-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article - Brain trauma Lindfors, Matias Lindblad, Caroline Nelson, David W. Bellander, Bo-Michael Siironen, Jari Raj, Rahul Thelin, Eric P. Prognostic performance of computerized tomography scoring systems in civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury: an observational study |
title | Prognostic performance of computerized tomography scoring systems in civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury: an observational study |
title_full | Prognostic performance of computerized tomography scoring systems in civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury: an observational study |
title_fullStr | Prognostic performance of computerized tomography scoring systems in civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury: an observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic performance of computerized tomography scoring systems in civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury: an observational study |
title_short | Prognostic performance of computerized tomography scoring systems in civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury: an observational study |
title_sort | prognostic performance of computerized tomography scoring systems in civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury: an observational study |
topic | Original Article - Brain trauma |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6874621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31659439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04074-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lindforsmatias prognosticperformanceofcomputerizedtomographyscoringsystemsincivilianpenetratingtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudy AT lindbladcaroline prognosticperformanceofcomputerizedtomographyscoringsystemsincivilianpenetratingtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudy AT nelsondavidw prognosticperformanceofcomputerizedtomographyscoringsystemsincivilianpenetratingtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudy AT bellanderbomichael prognosticperformanceofcomputerizedtomographyscoringsystemsincivilianpenetratingtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudy AT siironenjari prognosticperformanceofcomputerizedtomographyscoringsystemsincivilianpenetratingtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudy AT rajrahul prognosticperformanceofcomputerizedtomographyscoringsystemsincivilianpenetratingtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudy AT thelinericp prognosticperformanceofcomputerizedtomographyscoringsystemsincivilianpenetratingtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudy |