Cargando…

Prognostic performance of computerized tomography scoring systems in civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury: an observational study

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of penetrating traumatic brain injury (pTBI) is poor yet highly variable. Current computerized tomography (CT) severity scores are commonly not used for pTBI prognostication but may provide important clinical information in these cohorts. METHODS: All consecutive pTBI patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindfors, Matias, Lindblad, Caroline, Nelson, David W., Bellander, Bo-Michael, Siironen, Jari, Raj, Rahul, Thelin, Eric P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6874621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31659439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04074-1
_version_ 1783472874857693184
author Lindfors, Matias
Lindblad, Caroline
Nelson, David W.
Bellander, Bo-Michael
Siironen, Jari
Raj, Rahul
Thelin, Eric P.
author_facet Lindfors, Matias
Lindblad, Caroline
Nelson, David W.
Bellander, Bo-Michael
Siironen, Jari
Raj, Rahul
Thelin, Eric P.
author_sort Lindfors, Matias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prognosis of penetrating traumatic brain injury (pTBI) is poor yet highly variable. Current computerized tomography (CT) severity scores are commonly not used for pTBI prognostication but may provide important clinical information in these cohorts. METHODS: All consecutive pTBI patients from two large neurotrauma databases (Helsinki 1999–2015, Stockholm 2005–2014) were included. Outcome measures were 6-month mortality and unfavorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale 1–3). Admission head CT scans were assessed according to the following: Marshall CT classification, Rotterdam CT score, Stockholm CT score, and Helsinki CT score. The discrimination (area under the receiver operating curve, AUC) and explanatory variance (pseudo-R(2)) of the CT scores were assessed individually and in addition to a base model including age, motor response, and pupil responsiveness. RESULTS: Altogether, 75 patients were included. Overall 6-month mortality and unfavorable outcome were 45% and 61% for all patients, and 31% and 51% for actively treated patients. The CT scores’ AUCs and pseudo-R(2)s varied between 0.77–0.90 and 0.35–0.60 for mortality prediction and between 0.85–0.89 and 0.50–0.57 for unfavorable outcome prediction. The base model showed excellent performance for mortality (AUC 0.94, pseudo-R(2) 0.71) and unfavorable outcome (AUC 0.89, pseudo-R(2) 0.53) prediction. None of the CT scores increased the base model’s AUC (p > 0.05) yet increased its pseudo-R(2) (0.09–0.15) for unfavorable outcome prediction. CONCLUSION: Existing head CT scores demonstrate good-to-excellent performance in 6-month outcome prediction in pTBI patients. However, they do not add independent information to known outcome predictors, indicating that a unique score capturing the intracranial severity in pTBI may be warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-019-04074-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6874621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68746212019-12-06 Prognostic performance of computerized tomography scoring systems in civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury: an observational study Lindfors, Matias Lindblad, Caroline Nelson, David W. Bellander, Bo-Michael Siironen, Jari Raj, Rahul Thelin, Eric P. Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article - Brain trauma BACKGROUND: The prognosis of penetrating traumatic brain injury (pTBI) is poor yet highly variable. Current computerized tomography (CT) severity scores are commonly not used for pTBI prognostication but may provide important clinical information in these cohorts. METHODS: All consecutive pTBI patients from two large neurotrauma databases (Helsinki 1999–2015, Stockholm 2005–2014) were included. Outcome measures were 6-month mortality and unfavorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale 1–3). Admission head CT scans were assessed according to the following: Marshall CT classification, Rotterdam CT score, Stockholm CT score, and Helsinki CT score. The discrimination (area under the receiver operating curve, AUC) and explanatory variance (pseudo-R(2)) of the CT scores were assessed individually and in addition to a base model including age, motor response, and pupil responsiveness. RESULTS: Altogether, 75 patients were included. Overall 6-month mortality and unfavorable outcome were 45% and 61% for all patients, and 31% and 51% for actively treated patients. The CT scores’ AUCs and pseudo-R(2)s varied between 0.77–0.90 and 0.35–0.60 for mortality prediction and between 0.85–0.89 and 0.50–0.57 for unfavorable outcome prediction. The base model showed excellent performance for mortality (AUC 0.94, pseudo-R(2) 0.71) and unfavorable outcome (AUC 0.89, pseudo-R(2) 0.53) prediction. None of the CT scores increased the base model’s AUC (p > 0.05) yet increased its pseudo-R(2) (0.09–0.15) for unfavorable outcome prediction. CONCLUSION: Existing head CT scores demonstrate good-to-excellent performance in 6-month outcome prediction in pTBI patients. However, they do not add independent information to known outcome predictors, indicating that a unique score capturing the intracranial severity in pTBI may be warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00701-019-04074-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Vienna 2019-10-28 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6874621/ /pubmed/31659439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04074-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article - Brain trauma
Lindfors, Matias
Lindblad, Caroline
Nelson, David W.
Bellander, Bo-Michael
Siironen, Jari
Raj, Rahul
Thelin, Eric P.
Prognostic performance of computerized tomography scoring systems in civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury: an observational study
title Prognostic performance of computerized tomography scoring systems in civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury: an observational study
title_full Prognostic performance of computerized tomography scoring systems in civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury: an observational study
title_fullStr Prognostic performance of computerized tomography scoring systems in civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic performance of computerized tomography scoring systems in civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury: an observational study
title_short Prognostic performance of computerized tomography scoring systems in civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury: an observational study
title_sort prognostic performance of computerized tomography scoring systems in civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury: an observational study
topic Original Article - Brain trauma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6874621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31659439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04074-1
work_keys_str_mv AT lindforsmatias prognosticperformanceofcomputerizedtomographyscoringsystemsincivilianpenetratingtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudy
AT lindbladcaroline prognosticperformanceofcomputerizedtomographyscoringsystemsincivilianpenetratingtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudy
AT nelsondavidw prognosticperformanceofcomputerizedtomographyscoringsystemsincivilianpenetratingtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudy
AT bellanderbomichael prognosticperformanceofcomputerizedtomographyscoringsystemsincivilianpenetratingtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudy
AT siironenjari prognosticperformanceofcomputerizedtomographyscoringsystemsincivilianpenetratingtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudy
AT rajrahul prognosticperformanceofcomputerizedtomographyscoringsystemsincivilianpenetratingtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudy
AT thelinericp prognosticperformanceofcomputerizedtomographyscoringsystemsincivilianpenetratingtraumaticbraininjuryanobservationalstudy