Cargando…

Diagnostic Test Efficacy of Meibomian Gland Morphology and Function

Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is the leading cause of dry eye and proposed treatments are based on disease severity. Our purpose was to establish reliable morphologic measurements of meibomian glands for evaluating MGD severity. This retrospective, cross-sectional study included 100 MGD patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Jiaxin, Adil, Muhammed Yasin, Olafsson, Jonatan, Chen, Xiangjun, Utheim, Øygunn A., Ræder, Sten, Lagali, Neil S., Dartt, Darlene A., Utheim, Tor P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6874668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31758085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54013-4
_version_ 1783472883557728256
author Xiao, Jiaxin
Adil, Muhammed Yasin
Olafsson, Jonatan
Chen, Xiangjun
Utheim, Øygunn A.
Ræder, Sten
Lagali, Neil S.
Dartt, Darlene A.
Utheim, Tor P.
author_facet Xiao, Jiaxin
Adil, Muhammed Yasin
Olafsson, Jonatan
Chen, Xiangjun
Utheim, Øygunn A.
Ræder, Sten
Lagali, Neil S.
Dartt, Darlene A.
Utheim, Tor P.
author_sort Xiao, Jiaxin
collection PubMed
description Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is the leading cause of dry eye and proposed treatments are based on disease severity. Our purpose was to establish reliable morphologic measurements of meibomian glands for evaluating MGD severity. This retrospective, cross-sectional study included 100 MGD patients and 20 controls. The patients were classified into dry eye severity level (DESL) 1–4 based on symptoms and clinical parameters including tear-film breakup time, ocular staining and Schirmer I. The gland loss, length, thickness, density and distortion were analyzed. We compared the morphology between patients and controls; examined their correlations to meibum expressibility, quality, and DESL. Relative to controls, the gland thickness, density and distortion were elevated in patients (p < 0.001 for all tests). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96–1.0) for gland loss, and 0.96 (CI 0.91–1.0) for gland distortion, with a cutoff value of six distorted glands yielding a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 97% for MGD diagnosis. The gland distortion was negatively correlated to the meibum expressibility (r = −0.53; p < 0.001) and DESL (r = −0.22, p = 0.018). In conclusion, evaluation of meibomian gland loss and distortion are valuable complementary clinical parameters to assess MGD status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6874668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68746682019-12-04 Diagnostic Test Efficacy of Meibomian Gland Morphology and Function Xiao, Jiaxin Adil, Muhammed Yasin Olafsson, Jonatan Chen, Xiangjun Utheim, Øygunn A. Ræder, Sten Lagali, Neil S. Dartt, Darlene A. Utheim, Tor P. Sci Rep Article Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is the leading cause of dry eye and proposed treatments are based on disease severity. Our purpose was to establish reliable morphologic measurements of meibomian glands for evaluating MGD severity. This retrospective, cross-sectional study included 100 MGD patients and 20 controls. The patients were classified into dry eye severity level (DESL) 1–4 based on symptoms and clinical parameters including tear-film breakup time, ocular staining and Schirmer I. The gland loss, length, thickness, density and distortion were analyzed. We compared the morphology between patients and controls; examined their correlations to meibum expressibility, quality, and DESL. Relative to controls, the gland thickness, density and distortion were elevated in patients (p < 0.001 for all tests). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96–1.0) for gland loss, and 0.96 (CI 0.91–1.0) for gland distortion, with a cutoff value of six distorted glands yielding a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 97% for MGD diagnosis. The gland distortion was negatively correlated to the meibum expressibility (r = −0.53; p < 0.001) and DESL (r = −0.22, p = 0.018). In conclusion, evaluation of meibomian gland loss and distortion are valuable complementary clinical parameters to assess MGD status. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6874668/ /pubmed/31758085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54013-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Xiao, Jiaxin
Adil, Muhammed Yasin
Olafsson, Jonatan
Chen, Xiangjun
Utheim, Øygunn A.
Ræder, Sten
Lagali, Neil S.
Dartt, Darlene A.
Utheim, Tor P.
Diagnostic Test Efficacy of Meibomian Gland Morphology and Function
title Diagnostic Test Efficacy of Meibomian Gland Morphology and Function
title_full Diagnostic Test Efficacy of Meibomian Gland Morphology and Function
title_fullStr Diagnostic Test Efficacy of Meibomian Gland Morphology and Function
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Test Efficacy of Meibomian Gland Morphology and Function
title_short Diagnostic Test Efficacy of Meibomian Gland Morphology and Function
title_sort diagnostic test efficacy of meibomian gland morphology and function
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6874668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31758085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54013-4
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaojiaxin diagnostictestefficacyofmeibomianglandmorphologyandfunction
AT adilmuhammedyasin diagnostictestefficacyofmeibomianglandmorphologyandfunction
AT olafssonjonatan diagnostictestefficacyofmeibomianglandmorphologyandfunction
AT chenxiangjun diagnostictestefficacyofmeibomianglandmorphologyandfunction
AT utheimøygunna diagnostictestefficacyofmeibomianglandmorphologyandfunction
AT rædersten diagnostictestefficacyofmeibomianglandmorphologyandfunction
AT lagalineils diagnostictestefficacyofmeibomianglandmorphologyandfunction
AT darttdarlenea diagnostictestefficacyofmeibomianglandmorphologyandfunction
AT utheimtorp diagnostictestefficacyofmeibomianglandmorphologyandfunction