Cargando…

Considerations regarding Maximal Lactate Steady State determination before redefining the gold‐standard

We have read with interest the review written by Jones et al. (2019) published in a recent volume‐issue (volume 7, issue 5) of the journal. Criticisms regarding maximal lactate steady state intensity determination are to some extent correct and well‐justified. There are some aspects, however, that s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garcia‐Tabar, Ibai, Gorostiaga, Esteban M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6874780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31758638
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14293
_version_ 1783472892904734720
author Garcia‐Tabar, Ibai
Gorostiaga, Esteban M.
author_facet Garcia‐Tabar, Ibai
Gorostiaga, Esteban M.
author_sort Garcia‐Tabar, Ibai
collection PubMed
description We have read with interest the review written by Jones et al. (2019) published in a recent volume‐issue (volume 7, issue 5) of the journal. Criticisms regarding maximal lactate steady state intensity determination are to some extent correct and well‐justified. There are some aspects, however, that should be further clarified and documented before redefining the gold‐standard measure for the evaluation of endurance exercise capacity.[Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6874780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68747802019-11-25 Considerations regarding Maximal Lactate Steady State determination before redefining the gold‐standard Garcia‐Tabar, Ibai Gorostiaga, Esteban M. Physiol Rep Letters to the Editor We have read with interest the review written by Jones et al. (2019) published in a recent volume‐issue (volume 7, issue 5) of the journal. Criticisms regarding maximal lactate steady state intensity determination are to some extent correct and well‐justified. There are some aspects, however, that should be further clarified and documented before redefining the gold‐standard measure for the evaluation of endurance exercise capacity.[Image: see text] John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6874780/ /pubmed/31758638 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14293 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Letters to the Editor
Garcia‐Tabar, Ibai
Gorostiaga, Esteban M.
Considerations regarding Maximal Lactate Steady State determination before redefining the gold‐standard
title Considerations regarding Maximal Lactate Steady State determination before redefining the gold‐standard
title_full Considerations regarding Maximal Lactate Steady State determination before redefining the gold‐standard
title_fullStr Considerations regarding Maximal Lactate Steady State determination before redefining the gold‐standard
title_full_unstemmed Considerations regarding Maximal Lactate Steady State determination before redefining the gold‐standard
title_short Considerations regarding Maximal Lactate Steady State determination before redefining the gold‐standard
title_sort considerations regarding maximal lactate steady state determination before redefining the gold‐standard
topic Letters to the Editor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6874780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31758638
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14293
work_keys_str_mv AT garciatabaribai considerationsregardingmaximallactatesteadystatedeterminationbeforeredefiningthegoldstandard
AT gorostiagaestebanm considerationsregardingmaximallactatesteadystatedeterminationbeforeredefiningthegoldstandard