Cargando…

Validation of an Independent Web-Based Tool for Measuring Visual Acuity and Refractive Error (the Manifest versus Online Refractive Evaluation Trial): Prospective Open-Label Noninferiority Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Digital tools provide a unique opportunity to increase access to eye care. We developed a Web-based test that measures visual acuity and both spherical and cylindrical refractive errors. This test is Conformité Européenne marked and available on the Easee website. The purpose of this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wisse, Robert P L, Muijzer, Marc B, Cassano, Francesco, Godefrooij, Daniel A, Prevoo, Yves F D M, Soeters, Nienke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6874802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31702560
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14808
_version_ 1783472898217869312
author Wisse, Robert P L
Muijzer, Marc B
Cassano, Francesco
Godefrooij, Daniel A
Prevoo, Yves F D M
Soeters, Nienke
author_facet Wisse, Robert P L
Muijzer, Marc B
Cassano, Francesco
Godefrooij, Daniel A
Prevoo, Yves F D M
Soeters, Nienke
author_sort Wisse, Robert P L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Digital tools provide a unique opportunity to increase access to eye care. We developed a Web-based test that measures visual acuity and both spherical and cylindrical refractive errors. This test is Conformité Européenne marked and available on the Easee website. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of this Web-based tool with traditional subjective manifest refraction in a prospective open-label noninferiority clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of a Web-based refraction compared with a manifest refraction (golden standard). METHODS: Healthy volunteers from 18 to 40 years of age, with a refraction error between –6 and +4 diopter (D), were eligible. Each participant performed the Web-based test, and the reference test was performed by an optometrist. An absolute difference in refractive error of <0.5 D was considered noninferior. Reliability was assessed by using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Both uncorrected and corrected visual acuity were measured. RESULTS: A total of 200 eyes in 100 healthy volunteers were examined. The Web-based assessment of refractive error had excellent correlation with the reference test (ICC=0.92) and was considered noninferior to the reference test. Uncorrected visual acuity was similar with the Web-based test and the reference test (P=.21). Visual acuity was significantly improved using the prescription obtained by using the Web-based tool (P<.01). The Web-based test provided the best results in participants with mild myopia (ie, <3 D), with a mean difference of 0.02 (SD 0.49) D (P=.48) and yielding a corrected visual acuity of >1.0 in 90% (n=77) of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that Web-based eye testing is a valid and safe method for measuring visual acuity and refractive error in healthy eyes, particularly for mild myopia. This tool can be used for screening purposes, and it is an easily accessible alternative to the subjective manifest refraction test. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03313921; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03313921.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6874802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68748022019-12-12 Validation of an Independent Web-Based Tool for Measuring Visual Acuity and Refractive Error (the Manifest versus Online Refractive Evaluation Trial): Prospective Open-Label Noninferiority Clinical Trial. Wisse, Robert P L Muijzer, Marc B Cassano, Francesco Godefrooij, Daniel A Prevoo, Yves F D M Soeters, Nienke J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Digital tools provide a unique opportunity to increase access to eye care. We developed a Web-based test that measures visual acuity and both spherical and cylindrical refractive errors. This test is Conformité Européenne marked and available on the Easee website. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of this Web-based tool with traditional subjective manifest refraction in a prospective open-label noninferiority clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of a Web-based refraction compared with a manifest refraction (golden standard). METHODS: Healthy volunteers from 18 to 40 years of age, with a refraction error between –6 and +4 diopter (D), were eligible. Each participant performed the Web-based test, and the reference test was performed by an optometrist. An absolute difference in refractive error of <0.5 D was considered noninferior. Reliability was assessed by using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Both uncorrected and corrected visual acuity were measured. RESULTS: A total of 200 eyes in 100 healthy volunteers were examined. The Web-based assessment of refractive error had excellent correlation with the reference test (ICC=0.92) and was considered noninferior to the reference test. Uncorrected visual acuity was similar with the Web-based test and the reference test (P=.21). Visual acuity was significantly improved using the prescription obtained by using the Web-based tool (P<.01). The Web-based test provided the best results in participants with mild myopia (ie, <3 D), with a mean difference of 0.02 (SD 0.49) D (P=.48) and yielding a corrected visual acuity of >1.0 in 90% (n=77) of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that Web-based eye testing is a valid and safe method for measuring visual acuity and refractive error in healthy eyes, particularly for mild myopia. This tool can be used for screening purposes, and it is an easily accessible alternative to the subjective manifest refraction test. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03313921; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03313921. JMIR Publications 2019-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6874802/ /pubmed/31702560 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14808 Text en ©Robert P L Wisse, Marc B Muijzer, Francesco Cassano, Daniel A Godefrooij, Yves F D M Prevoo, Nienke Soeters. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 08.11.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Wisse, Robert P L
Muijzer, Marc B
Cassano, Francesco
Godefrooij, Daniel A
Prevoo, Yves F D M
Soeters, Nienke
Validation of an Independent Web-Based Tool for Measuring Visual Acuity and Refractive Error (the Manifest versus Online Refractive Evaluation Trial): Prospective Open-Label Noninferiority Clinical Trial.
title Validation of an Independent Web-Based Tool for Measuring Visual Acuity and Refractive Error (the Manifest versus Online Refractive Evaluation Trial): Prospective Open-Label Noninferiority Clinical Trial.
title_full Validation of an Independent Web-Based Tool for Measuring Visual Acuity and Refractive Error (the Manifest versus Online Refractive Evaluation Trial): Prospective Open-Label Noninferiority Clinical Trial.
title_fullStr Validation of an Independent Web-Based Tool for Measuring Visual Acuity and Refractive Error (the Manifest versus Online Refractive Evaluation Trial): Prospective Open-Label Noninferiority Clinical Trial.
title_full_unstemmed Validation of an Independent Web-Based Tool for Measuring Visual Acuity and Refractive Error (the Manifest versus Online Refractive Evaluation Trial): Prospective Open-Label Noninferiority Clinical Trial.
title_short Validation of an Independent Web-Based Tool for Measuring Visual Acuity and Refractive Error (the Manifest versus Online Refractive Evaluation Trial): Prospective Open-Label Noninferiority Clinical Trial.
title_sort validation of an independent web-based tool for measuring visual acuity and refractive error (the manifest versus online refractive evaluation trial): prospective open-label noninferiority clinical trial.
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6874802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31702560
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14808
work_keys_str_mv AT wisserobertpl validationofanindependentwebbasedtoolformeasuringvisualacuityandrefractiveerrorthemanifestversusonlinerefractiveevaluationtrialprospectiveopenlabelnoninferiorityclinicaltrial
AT muijzermarcb validationofanindependentwebbasedtoolformeasuringvisualacuityandrefractiveerrorthemanifestversusonlinerefractiveevaluationtrialprospectiveopenlabelnoninferiorityclinicaltrial
AT cassanofrancesco validationofanindependentwebbasedtoolformeasuringvisualacuityandrefractiveerrorthemanifestversusonlinerefractiveevaluationtrialprospectiveopenlabelnoninferiorityclinicaltrial
AT godefrooijdaniela validationofanindependentwebbasedtoolformeasuringvisualacuityandrefractiveerrorthemanifestversusonlinerefractiveevaluationtrialprospectiveopenlabelnoninferiorityclinicaltrial
AT prevooyvesfdm validationofanindependentwebbasedtoolformeasuringvisualacuityandrefractiveerrorthemanifestversusonlinerefractiveevaluationtrialprospectiveopenlabelnoninferiorityclinicaltrial
AT soetersnienke validationofanindependentwebbasedtoolformeasuringvisualacuityandrefractiveerrorthemanifestversusonlinerefractiveevaluationtrialprospectiveopenlabelnoninferiorityclinicaltrial