Cargando…

An Alternative Psychophysical Diagnostic Indicator of the Aging Eye

PURPOSE: Impaired adaptation to changes in lighting levels as well as mesopic visual function is a common complaint in those over the age of 65. The use of photostress is a well-established method to test the adaption rate and the response of the visual cycle. In this study, we test visual function...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodriguez, John D., Wallstrom, Garrick, Narayanan, Divya, Welch, Donna, Abelson, Mark B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6874969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31781372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2036192
_version_ 1783472924521398272
author Rodriguez, John D.
Wallstrom, Garrick
Narayanan, Divya
Welch, Donna
Abelson, Mark B.
author_facet Rodriguez, John D.
Wallstrom, Garrick
Narayanan, Divya
Welch, Donna
Abelson, Mark B.
author_sort Rodriguez, John D.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Impaired adaptation to changes in lighting levels as well as mesopic visual function is a common complaint in those over the age of 65. The use of photostress is a well-established method to test the adaption rate and the response of the visual cycle. In this study, we test visual function recovery to mesopic luminance stimuli following a long duration photostress in young and elderly subjects. If successful in strongly differentiating aging macular function, these methods may also be useful in the study of pathologies such as age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: A group of 12 older normal subjects (mean age 75.1 ± 4.79) and a control group of 5 younger normal subjects (mean age 26.2 ± 4.19) were subjected to macular photostress using the OraLux photostress system. The OraLux system provides a diffuse light source bleaching 84% of cone photopigment while maintaining an exposure safety factor of 200 times less than the maximum safe exposure. After each photostressing session, macular recovery was tracked using a foveal, variable contrast, flickering stimulus of mean luminance in the high mesopic range. Recovery was tracked for 300 seconds. The endpoint was time to recovery to each individual's baseline sensitivity as determined by two static sensitivity trials prior to photostress. RESULTS: Proportional hazards analysis of recovery time yielded a statistically significant difference between the older group and the young group (HR = 0.181; p=0.0289). The estimated hazard ratio of 0.181 indicates that older subjects return to baseline at less than one-fifth the rate of younger subjects. The hazards ratio remained statistically significant after adjusting for visual acuity (HR = 0.093; p=0.0424). CONCLUSION: Photostress recovery of flicker sensitivity under mesopic conditions is a strong differentiator of aging macular function. This agrees with subject-reported complaints in reduced luminance conditions after exposure to bright lights such as night driving. The qualitative similarity between the aging retina and changes in early AMD suggests that flicker recovery following photostress may be useful as a surrogate endpoint in AMD clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6874969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68749692019-11-28 An Alternative Psychophysical Diagnostic Indicator of the Aging Eye Rodriguez, John D. Wallstrom, Garrick Narayanan, Divya Welch, Donna Abelson, Mark B. J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: Impaired adaptation to changes in lighting levels as well as mesopic visual function is a common complaint in those over the age of 65. The use of photostress is a well-established method to test the adaption rate and the response of the visual cycle. In this study, we test visual function recovery to mesopic luminance stimuli following a long duration photostress in young and elderly subjects. If successful in strongly differentiating aging macular function, these methods may also be useful in the study of pathologies such as age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: A group of 12 older normal subjects (mean age 75.1 ± 4.79) and a control group of 5 younger normal subjects (mean age 26.2 ± 4.19) were subjected to macular photostress using the OraLux photostress system. The OraLux system provides a diffuse light source bleaching 84% of cone photopigment while maintaining an exposure safety factor of 200 times less than the maximum safe exposure. After each photostressing session, macular recovery was tracked using a foveal, variable contrast, flickering stimulus of mean luminance in the high mesopic range. Recovery was tracked for 300 seconds. The endpoint was time to recovery to each individual's baseline sensitivity as determined by two static sensitivity trials prior to photostress. RESULTS: Proportional hazards analysis of recovery time yielded a statistically significant difference between the older group and the young group (HR = 0.181; p=0.0289). The estimated hazard ratio of 0.181 indicates that older subjects return to baseline at less than one-fifth the rate of younger subjects. The hazards ratio remained statistically significant after adjusting for visual acuity (HR = 0.093; p=0.0424). CONCLUSION: Photostress recovery of flicker sensitivity under mesopic conditions is a strong differentiator of aging macular function. This agrees with subject-reported complaints in reduced luminance conditions after exposure to bright lights such as night driving. The qualitative similarity between the aging retina and changes in early AMD suggests that flicker recovery following photostress may be useful as a surrogate endpoint in AMD clinical trials. Hindawi 2019-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6874969/ /pubmed/31781372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2036192 Text en Copyright © 2019 John D. Rodriguez et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rodriguez, John D.
Wallstrom, Garrick
Narayanan, Divya
Welch, Donna
Abelson, Mark B.
An Alternative Psychophysical Diagnostic Indicator of the Aging Eye
title An Alternative Psychophysical Diagnostic Indicator of the Aging Eye
title_full An Alternative Psychophysical Diagnostic Indicator of the Aging Eye
title_fullStr An Alternative Psychophysical Diagnostic Indicator of the Aging Eye
title_full_unstemmed An Alternative Psychophysical Diagnostic Indicator of the Aging Eye
title_short An Alternative Psychophysical Diagnostic Indicator of the Aging Eye
title_sort alternative psychophysical diagnostic indicator of the aging eye
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6874969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31781372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2036192
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguezjohnd analternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye
AT wallstromgarrick analternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye
AT narayanandivya analternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye
AT welchdonna analternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye
AT abelsonmarkb analternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye
AT rodriguezjohnd alternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye
AT wallstromgarrick alternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye
AT narayanandivya alternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye
AT welchdonna alternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye
AT abelsonmarkb alternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye