Cargando…
An Alternative Psychophysical Diagnostic Indicator of the Aging Eye
PURPOSE: Impaired adaptation to changes in lighting levels as well as mesopic visual function is a common complaint in those over the age of 65. The use of photostress is a well-established method to test the adaption rate and the response of the visual cycle. In this study, we test visual function...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6874969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31781372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2036192 |
_version_ | 1783472924521398272 |
---|---|
author | Rodriguez, John D. Wallstrom, Garrick Narayanan, Divya Welch, Donna Abelson, Mark B. |
author_facet | Rodriguez, John D. Wallstrom, Garrick Narayanan, Divya Welch, Donna Abelson, Mark B. |
author_sort | Rodriguez, John D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Impaired adaptation to changes in lighting levels as well as mesopic visual function is a common complaint in those over the age of 65. The use of photostress is a well-established method to test the adaption rate and the response of the visual cycle. In this study, we test visual function recovery to mesopic luminance stimuli following a long duration photostress in young and elderly subjects. If successful in strongly differentiating aging macular function, these methods may also be useful in the study of pathologies such as age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: A group of 12 older normal subjects (mean age 75.1 ± 4.79) and a control group of 5 younger normal subjects (mean age 26.2 ± 4.19) were subjected to macular photostress using the OraLux photostress system. The OraLux system provides a diffuse light source bleaching 84% of cone photopigment while maintaining an exposure safety factor of 200 times less than the maximum safe exposure. After each photostressing session, macular recovery was tracked using a foveal, variable contrast, flickering stimulus of mean luminance in the high mesopic range. Recovery was tracked for 300 seconds. The endpoint was time to recovery to each individual's baseline sensitivity as determined by two static sensitivity trials prior to photostress. RESULTS: Proportional hazards analysis of recovery time yielded a statistically significant difference between the older group and the young group (HR = 0.181; p=0.0289). The estimated hazard ratio of 0.181 indicates that older subjects return to baseline at less than one-fifth the rate of younger subjects. The hazards ratio remained statistically significant after adjusting for visual acuity (HR = 0.093; p=0.0424). CONCLUSION: Photostress recovery of flicker sensitivity under mesopic conditions is a strong differentiator of aging macular function. This agrees with subject-reported complaints in reduced luminance conditions after exposure to bright lights such as night driving. The qualitative similarity between the aging retina and changes in early AMD suggests that flicker recovery following photostress may be useful as a surrogate endpoint in AMD clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6874969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68749692019-11-28 An Alternative Psychophysical Diagnostic Indicator of the Aging Eye Rodriguez, John D. Wallstrom, Garrick Narayanan, Divya Welch, Donna Abelson, Mark B. J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: Impaired adaptation to changes in lighting levels as well as mesopic visual function is a common complaint in those over the age of 65. The use of photostress is a well-established method to test the adaption rate and the response of the visual cycle. In this study, we test visual function recovery to mesopic luminance stimuli following a long duration photostress in young and elderly subjects. If successful in strongly differentiating aging macular function, these methods may also be useful in the study of pathologies such as age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: A group of 12 older normal subjects (mean age 75.1 ± 4.79) and a control group of 5 younger normal subjects (mean age 26.2 ± 4.19) were subjected to macular photostress using the OraLux photostress system. The OraLux system provides a diffuse light source bleaching 84% of cone photopigment while maintaining an exposure safety factor of 200 times less than the maximum safe exposure. After each photostressing session, macular recovery was tracked using a foveal, variable contrast, flickering stimulus of mean luminance in the high mesopic range. Recovery was tracked for 300 seconds. The endpoint was time to recovery to each individual's baseline sensitivity as determined by two static sensitivity trials prior to photostress. RESULTS: Proportional hazards analysis of recovery time yielded a statistically significant difference between the older group and the young group (HR = 0.181; p=0.0289). The estimated hazard ratio of 0.181 indicates that older subjects return to baseline at less than one-fifth the rate of younger subjects. The hazards ratio remained statistically significant after adjusting for visual acuity (HR = 0.093; p=0.0424). CONCLUSION: Photostress recovery of flicker sensitivity under mesopic conditions is a strong differentiator of aging macular function. This agrees with subject-reported complaints in reduced luminance conditions after exposure to bright lights such as night driving. The qualitative similarity between the aging retina and changes in early AMD suggests that flicker recovery following photostress may be useful as a surrogate endpoint in AMD clinical trials. Hindawi 2019-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6874969/ /pubmed/31781372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2036192 Text en Copyright © 2019 John D. Rodriguez et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rodriguez, John D. Wallstrom, Garrick Narayanan, Divya Welch, Donna Abelson, Mark B. An Alternative Psychophysical Diagnostic Indicator of the Aging Eye |
title | An Alternative Psychophysical Diagnostic Indicator of the Aging Eye |
title_full | An Alternative Psychophysical Diagnostic Indicator of the Aging Eye |
title_fullStr | An Alternative Psychophysical Diagnostic Indicator of the Aging Eye |
title_full_unstemmed | An Alternative Psychophysical Diagnostic Indicator of the Aging Eye |
title_short | An Alternative Psychophysical Diagnostic Indicator of the Aging Eye |
title_sort | alternative psychophysical diagnostic indicator of the aging eye |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6874969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31781372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2036192 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rodriguezjohnd analternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye AT wallstromgarrick analternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye AT narayanandivya analternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye AT welchdonna analternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye AT abelsonmarkb analternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye AT rodriguezjohnd alternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye AT wallstromgarrick alternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye AT narayanandivya alternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye AT welchdonna alternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye AT abelsonmarkb alternativepsychophysicaldiagnosticindicatoroftheagingeye |