Cargando…

Lymph Node Yield Following Packet Submission After Isolation By Surgeon During Gastrectomy

PURPOSE: To compare the lymph node yields of lymph node packet submission (PS), packet submission after isolation by surgeons (PSI), and en bloc lymph node submission (EBS) after gastrectomy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study including 118 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Pengpeng, Zhang, Kecheng, Xi, Hongqing, Liang, Wenquan, Xie, Tianyu, Gao, Yunhe, Wei, Bo, Chen, Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6875238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31819624
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S211218
_version_ 1783472984949784576
author Wang, Pengpeng
Zhang, Kecheng
Xi, Hongqing
Liang, Wenquan
Xie, Tianyu
Gao, Yunhe
Wei, Bo
Chen, Lin
author_facet Wang, Pengpeng
Zhang, Kecheng
Xi, Hongqing
Liang, Wenquan
Xie, Tianyu
Gao, Yunhe
Wei, Bo
Chen, Lin
author_sort Wang, Pengpeng
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the lymph node yields of lymph node packet submission (PS), packet submission after isolation by surgeons (PSI), and en bloc lymph node submission (EBS) after gastrectomy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study including 118 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy between June 2016 and August 2016. We also retrospectively reviewed 607 patients who underwent gastrectomy from May 2015 to May 2016. Following gastrectomy, lymph node specimens were either submitted en bloc (EBS group), divided into packets with accompanying adipose tissue according to the lymph node stations (PS group), or isolated individually based on the surgeon’s visualization and palpation before submission to the Pathology Department (PSI group). RESULTS: The average lymph node yield was significantly higher in the PSI compared with the PS group in the prospective study (46.5±19.4 vs 31.8±11.1), and significantly higher in the PS compared with the EBS group in the retrospective study (31.5±12.6 vs 23.9±8.9) (both P<0.001). There was no significant difference in positive lymph node yields in either of these comparisons (prospective study, P=0.581; retrospective study, P=0.489). The survival curve indicated no significant difference between the PS and PSI groups (log rank P=0.957); however, these three groups share different lymph node ratio (LNR). CONCLUSION: PSI could yield more lymph nodes than PS or EBS with a lower LNR at pathological examination. However, the difference in lymph nodes harvested had no impact on survival, which may need further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6875238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68752382019-12-09 Lymph Node Yield Following Packet Submission After Isolation By Surgeon During Gastrectomy Wang, Pengpeng Zhang, Kecheng Xi, Hongqing Liang, Wenquan Xie, Tianyu Gao, Yunhe Wei, Bo Chen, Lin Cancer Manag Res Original Research PURPOSE: To compare the lymph node yields of lymph node packet submission (PS), packet submission after isolation by surgeons (PSI), and en bloc lymph node submission (EBS) after gastrectomy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study including 118 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy between June 2016 and August 2016. We also retrospectively reviewed 607 patients who underwent gastrectomy from May 2015 to May 2016. Following gastrectomy, lymph node specimens were either submitted en bloc (EBS group), divided into packets with accompanying adipose tissue according to the lymph node stations (PS group), or isolated individually based on the surgeon’s visualization and palpation before submission to the Pathology Department (PSI group). RESULTS: The average lymph node yield was significantly higher in the PSI compared with the PS group in the prospective study (46.5±19.4 vs 31.8±11.1), and significantly higher in the PS compared with the EBS group in the retrospective study (31.5±12.6 vs 23.9±8.9) (both P<0.001). There was no significant difference in positive lymph node yields in either of these comparisons (prospective study, P=0.581; retrospective study, P=0.489). The survival curve indicated no significant difference between the PS and PSI groups (log rank P=0.957); however, these three groups share different lymph node ratio (LNR). CONCLUSION: PSI could yield more lymph nodes than PS or EBS with a lower LNR at pathological examination. However, the difference in lymph nodes harvested had no impact on survival, which may need further investigation. Dove 2019-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6875238/ /pubmed/31819624 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S211218 Text en © 2019 Wang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Wang, Pengpeng
Zhang, Kecheng
Xi, Hongqing
Liang, Wenquan
Xie, Tianyu
Gao, Yunhe
Wei, Bo
Chen, Lin
Lymph Node Yield Following Packet Submission After Isolation By Surgeon During Gastrectomy
title Lymph Node Yield Following Packet Submission After Isolation By Surgeon During Gastrectomy
title_full Lymph Node Yield Following Packet Submission After Isolation By Surgeon During Gastrectomy
title_fullStr Lymph Node Yield Following Packet Submission After Isolation By Surgeon During Gastrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Lymph Node Yield Following Packet Submission After Isolation By Surgeon During Gastrectomy
title_short Lymph Node Yield Following Packet Submission After Isolation By Surgeon During Gastrectomy
title_sort lymph node yield following packet submission after isolation by surgeon during gastrectomy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6875238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31819624
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S211218
work_keys_str_mv AT wangpengpeng lymphnodeyieldfollowingpacketsubmissionafterisolationbysurgeonduringgastrectomy
AT zhangkecheng lymphnodeyieldfollowingpacketsubmissionafterisolationbysurgeonduringgastrectomy
AT xihongqing lymphnodeyieldfollowingpacketsubmissionafterisolationbysurgeonduringgastrectomy
AT liangwenquan lymphnodeyieldfollowingpacketsubmissionafterisolationbysurgeonduringgastrectomy
AT xietianyu lymphnodeyieldfollowingpacketsubmissionafterisolationbysurgeonduringgastrectomy
AT gaoyunhe lymphnodeyieldfollowingpacketsubmissionafterisolationbysurgeonduringgastrectomy
AT weibo lymphnodeyieldfollowingpacketsubmissionafterisolationbysurgeonduringgastrectomy
AT chenlin lymphnodeyieldfollowingpacketsubmissionafterisolationbysurgeonduringgastrectomy