Cargando…

A Feasibility Study Of Administering The Electronic Research And Development Culture Index To The Multidisciplinary Workforce In A UK Teaching Hospital

PURPOSE: The study aims were: (i) to convert the Research and Development Culture Index (a validated rating instrument for assessing the strength of organizational Research and Development culture) into electronic format (eR&DCI), and (ii) to test the format and assess the feasibility of adminis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hollis, Rachel, Ersser, Steven J, Iles-Smith, Heather, Milnes, Linda Jane, Munyombwe, Theresa, Sanders, Cilla, Swallow, Veronica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6875253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31819468
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S218630
_version_ 1783472986920058880
author Hollis, Rachel
Ersser, Steven J
Iles-Smith, Heather
Milnes, Linda Jane
Munyombwe, Theresa
Sanders, Cilla
Swallow, Veronica
author_facet Hollis, Rachel
Ersser, Steven J
Iles-Smith, Heather
Milnes, Linda Jane
Munyombwe, Theresa
Sanders, Cilla
Swallow, Veronica
author_sort Hollis, Rachel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The study aims were: (i) to convert the Research and Development Culture Index (a validated rating instrument for assessing the strength of organizational Research and Development culture) into electronic format (eR&DCI), and (ii) to test the format and assess the feasibility of administering it to the multidisciplinary (allied health professionals, doctors and nurses) workforce in a National Health Service Hospital (NHS) in the United Kingdom (UK) by trialing it with the workforce of the tertiary Children’s Hospital within the organization. POPULATION AND METHODS: The eR&DCI was emailed to all professional staff (n=907) in the Children’s Hospital. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 22. RESULTS: The eR&DCI was completed by 155 respondents (doctors n=38 (24.52%), nurses n=79 (50.96%) and allied health professionals (AHPs) n=38 (24.52%)). The response rate varied by professional group: responses were received from 79 out of 700 nurses (11%); 38 out of 132 doctors (29%) and 38 out of 76 AHPs (50%). Index scores demonstrated a positive research culture within the multidisciplinary workforce. Survey responses demonstrated differences between the professions related to research training and engagement in formal research activities. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to assess the feasibility of assessing the strength of an organization’s multidisciplinary workforce research and development (R&D) culture by surveying that workforce using the eR&DCI. We converted the index to “Online Surveys” and successfully administered it to the entire multidisciplinary workforce in the Children’s Hospital. We met our criteria for feasibility: ability to administer the survey and a response rate comparable with similar studies. Uptake could have been increased by also offering the option of the paper-based index for self-administration. Results of the survey are informing delivery of the research strategy in the Children’s Hospital. This methodology has potential application in other healthcare contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6875253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68752532019-12-09 A Feasibility Study Of Administering The Electronic Research And Development Culture Index To The Multidisciplinary Workforce In A UK Teaching Hospital Hollis, Rachel Ersser, Steven J Iles-Smith, Heather Milnes, Linda Jane Munyombwe, Theresa Sanders, Cilla Swallow, Veronica J Multidiscip Healthc Original Research PURPOSE: The study aims were: (i) to convert the Research and Development Culture Index (a validated rating instrument for assessing the strength of organizational Research and Development culture) into electronic format (eR&DCI), and (ii) to test the format and assess the feasibility of administering it to the multidisciplinary (allied health professionals, doctors and nurses) workforce in a National Health Service Hospital (NHS) in the United Kingdom (UK) by trialing it with the workforce of the tertiary Children’s Hospital within the organization. POPULATION AND METHODS: The eR&DCI was emailed to all professional staff (n=907) in the Children’s Hospital. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 22. RESULTS: The eR&DCI was completed by 155 respondents (doctors n=38 (24.52%), nurses n=79 (50.96%) and allied health professionals (AHPs) n=38 (24.52%)). The response rate varied by professional group: responses were received from 79 out of 700 nurses (11%); 38 out of 132 doctors (29%) and 38 out of 76 AHPs (50%). Index scores demonstrated a positive research culture within the multidisciplinary workforce. Survey responses demonstrated differences between the professions related to research training and engagement in formal research activities. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to assess the feasibility of assessing the strength of an organization’s multidisciplinary workforce research and development (R&D) culture by surveying that workforce using the eR&DCI. We converted the index to “Online Surveys” and successfully administered it to the entire multidisciplinary workforce in the Children’s Hospital. We met our criteria for feasibility: ability to administer the survey and a response rate comparable with similar studies. Uptake could have been increased by also offering the option of the paper-based index for self-administration. Results of the survey are informing delivery of the research strategy in the Children’s Hospital. This methodology has potential application in other healthcare contexts. Dove 2019-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6875253/ /pubmed/31819468 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S218630 Text en © 2019 Hollis et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Hollis, Rachel
Ersser, Steven J
Iles-Smith, Heather
Milnes, Linda Jane
Munyombwe, Theresa
Sanders, Cilla
Swallow, Veronica
A Feasibility Study Of Administering The Electronic Research And Development Culture Index To The Multidisciplinary Workforce In A UK Teaching Hospital
title A Feasibility Study Of Administering The Electronic Research And Development Culture Index To The Multidisciplinary Workforce In A UK Teaching Hospital
title_full A Feasibility Study Of Administering The Electronic Research And Development Culture Index To The Multidisciplinary Workforce In A UK Teaching Hospital
title_fullStr A Feasibility Study Of Administering The Electronic Research And Development Culture Index To The Multidisciplinary Workforce In A UK Teaching Hospital
title_full_unstemmed A Feasibility Study Of Administering The Electronic Research And Development Culture Index To The Multidisciplinary Workforce In A UK Teaching Hospital
title_short A Feasibility Study Of Administering The Electronic Research And Development Culture Index To The Multidisciplinary Workforce In A UK Teaching Hospital
title_sort feasibility study of administering the electronic research and development culture index to the multidisciplinary workforce in a uk teaching hospital
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6875253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31819468
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S218630
work_keys_str_mv AT hollisrachel afeasibilitystudyofadministeringtheelectronicresearchanddevelopmentcultureindextothemultidisciplinaryworkforceinaukteachinghospital
AT ersserstevenj afeasibilitystudyofadministeringtheelectronicresearchanddevelopmentcultureindextothemultidisciplinaryworkforceinaukteachinghospital
AT ilessmithheather afeasibilitystudyofadministeringtheelectronicresearchanddevelopmentcultureindextothemultidisciplinaryworkforceinaukteachinghospital
AT milneslindajane afeasibilitystudyofadministeringtheelectronicresearchanddevelopmentcultureindextothemultidisciplinaryworkforceinaukteachinghospital
AT munyombwetheresa afeasibilitystudyofadministeringtheelectronicresearchanddevelopmentcultureindextothemultidisciplinaryworkforceinaukteachinghospital
AT sanderscilla afeasibilitystudyofadministeringtheelectronicresearchanddevelopmentcultureindextothemultidisciplinaryworkforceinaukteachinghospital
AT swallowveronica afeasibilitystudyofadministeringtheelectronicresearchanddevelopmentcultureindextothemultidisciplinaryworkforceinaukteachinghospital
AT hollisrachel feasibilitystudyofadministeringtheelectronicresearchanddevelopmentcultureindextothemultidisciplinaryworkforceinaukteachinghospital
AT ersserstevenj feasibilitystudyofadministeringtheelectronicresearchanddevelopmentcultureindextothemultidisciplinaryworkforceinaukteachinghospital
AT ilessmithheather feasibilitystudyofadministeringtheelectronicresearchanddevelopmentcultureindextothemultidisciplinaryworkforceinaukteachinghospital
AT milneslindajane feasibilitystudyofadministeringtheelectronicresearchanddevelopmentcultureindextothemultidisciplinaryworkforceinaukteachinghospital
AT munyombwetheresa feasibilitystudyofadministeringtheelectronicresearchanddevelopmentcultureindextothemultidisciplinaryworkforceinaukteachinghospital
AT sanderscilla feasibilitystudyofadministeringtheelectronicresearchanddevelopmentcultureindextothemultidisciplinaryworkforceinaukteachinghospital
AT swallowveronica feasibilitystudyofadministeringtheelectronicresearchanddevelopmentcultureindextothemultidisciplinaryworkforceinaukteachinghospital