Cargando…

Patients’ Perceptions To Reduced Orthodontic Treatment Time In Saudi Arabia

PURPOSE: To evaluate patients’ perceptions regarding orthodontic treatment duration, cost, and willingness to undergo different procedures and techniques available to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement in Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Saudi Arabia f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Linjawi, Amal I, Abushal, Amal M, Al-Zahrani, Amal M, Bakhamis, Bushra A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6875266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31819379
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S222181
_version_ 1783472990083612672
author Linjawi, Amal I
Abushal, Amal M
Al-Zahrani, Amal M
Bakhamis, Bushra A
author_facet Linjawi, Amal I
Abushal, Amal M
Al-Zahrani, Amal M
Bakhamis, Bushra A
author_sort Linjawi, Amal I
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate patients’ perceptions regarding orthodontic treatment duration, cost, and willingness to undergo different procedures and techniques available to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement in Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Saudi Arabia from January to March 2019. Patients from multiple centers were electronically surveyed regarding their perception of orthodontic treatment duration, acceptance of appliances and techniques available to shorten the duration of orthodontic treatment, and how much increase in fees they were willing to pay for those appliances and techniques. Descriptive and group comparison statistics were conducted, and the significance level was set at p<0.05. RESULTS: The response rate was 200/400 (50%): 50.5% were (>18–25 years old), 67.5% female, 80% Saudi, 67.5% self-pay and 52% with annual income <10,000 SR. A total of 83% of the participants agree that orthodontic treatment takes too long, and 55.5% wish it takes less than 6 months. The preferences for additional procedures were ranked in the following order: customized wires ranked 1 by 52.5%, followed by FDA (Food & Drug Administration) approved teeth vibrators by 40.5%, FDA approved drug injections by 33.5%, piezocision by 32.5%, and corticotomies by 46% of the participants. No significant differences in ranking between the groups according to age and annual income (p>0.05). 47.5% of the participants were able to pay for additional procedures. An increase in treatment fees was reported for up to (30–40%) for FDA approved teeth vibrators by 59% of the participants, followed by FDA approved drug injections by 33% of the participants. A significant difference in responses between the groups was reported according to gender and annual income (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Most of the patients strongly agreed that orthodontics treatment takes too long. The highest percentages of patients perceived customized wires as the most acceptable technique to undergo to shorten orthodontic treatment duration, followed by teeth vibrators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6875266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68752662019-12-09 Patients’ Perceptions To Reduced Orthodontic Treatment Time In Saudi Arabia Linjawi, Amal I Abushal, Amal M Al-Zahrani, Amal M Bakhamis, Bushra A Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research PURPOSE: To evaluate patients’ perceptions regarding orthodontic treatment duration, cost, and willingness to undergo different procedures and techniques available to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement in Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Saudi Arabia from January to March 2019. Patients from multiple centers were electronically surveyed regarding their perception of orthodontic treatment duration, acceptance of appliances and techniques available to shorten the duration of orthodontic treatment, and how much increase in fees they were willing to pay for those appliances and techniques. Descriptive and group comparison statistics were conducted, and the significance level was set at p<0.05. RESULTS: The response rate was 200/400 (50%): 50.5% were (>18–25 years old), 67.5% female, 80% Saudi, 67.5% self-pay and 52% with annual income <10,000 SR. A total of 83% of the participants agree that orthodontic treatment takes too long, and 55.5% wish it takes less than 6 months. The preferences for additional procedures were ranked in the following order: customized wires ranked 1 by 52.5%, followed by FDA (Food & Drug Administration) approved teeth vibrators by 40.5%, FDA approved drug injections by 33.5%, piezocision by 32.5%, and corticotomies by 46% of the participants. No significant differences in ranking between the groups according to age and annual income (p>0.05). 47.5% of the participants were able to pay for additional procedures. An increase in treatment fees was reported for up to (30–40%) for FDA approved teeth vibrators by 59% of the participants, followed by FDA approved drug injections by 33% of the participants. A significant difference in responses between the groups was reported according to gender and annual income (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Most of the patients strongly agreed that orthodontics treatment takes too long. The highest percentages of patients perceived customized wires as the most acceptable technique to undergo to shorten orthodontic treatment duration, followed by teeth vibrators. Dove 2019-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6875266/ /pubmed/31819379 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S222181 Text en © 2019 Linjawi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Linjawi, Amal I
Abushal, Amal M
Al-Zahrani, Amal M
Bakhamis, Bushra A
Patients’ Perceptions To Reduced Orthodontic Treatment Time In Saudi Arabia
title Patients’ Perceptions To Reduced Orthodontic Treatment Time In Saudi Arabia
title_full Patients’ Perceptions To Reduced Orthodontic Treatment Time In Saudi Arabia
title_fullStr Patients’ Perceptions To Reduced Orthodontic Treatment Time In Saudi Arabia
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ Perceptions To Reduced Orthodontic Treatment Time In Saudi Arabia
title_short Patients’ Perceptions To Reduced Orthodontic Treatment Time In Saudi Arabia
title_sort patients’ perceptions to reduced orthodontic treatment time in saudi arabia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6875266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31819379
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S222181
work_keys_str_mv AT linjawiamali patientsperceptionstoreducedorthodontictreatmenttimeinsaudiarabia
AT abushalamalm patientsperceptionstoreducedorthodontictreatmenttimeinsaudiarabia
AT alzahraniamalm patientsperceptionstoreducedorthodontictreatmenttimeinsaudiarabia
AT bakhamisbushraa patientsperceptionstoreducedorthodontictreatmenttimeinsaudiarabia