Cargando…

Experimental harvest regulations reveal that water availability during spring, not harvest, affects change in a waterfowl population

Population change is regulated by vital rates that are influenced by environmental conditions, demographic stochasticity, and, increasingly, anthropogenic effects. Habitat destruction and climate change threaten the future of many wildlife populations, and there are additional concerns regarding the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sedinger, Benjamin S., Riecke, Thomas V., Nicolai, Christopher A., Woolstenhulme, Russell, Henry, William G., Stewart, Kelley M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6875577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5743
_version_ 1783473063329792000
author Sedinger, Benjamin S.
Riecke, Thomas V.
Nicolai, Christopher A.
Woolstenhulme, Russell
Henry, William G.
Stewart, Kelley M.
author_facet Sedinger, Benjamin S.
Riecke, Thomas V.
Nicolai, Christopher A.
Woolstenhulme, Russell
Henry, William G.
Stewart, Kelley M.
author_sort Sedinger, Benjamin S.
collection PubMed
description Population change is regulated by vital rates that are influenced by environmental conditions, demographic stochasticity, and, increasingly, anthropogenic effects. Habitat destruction and climate change threaten the future of many wildlife populations, and there are additional concerns regarding the effects of harvest rates on demographic components of harvested organisms. Further, many population managers strictly manage harvest of wild organisms to mediate population trends of these populations. The goal of our study was to decouple harvest and environmental variability in a closely monitored population of wild ducks in North America, where we experimentally regulated harvest independently of environmental variation over a period of 4 years. We used 9 years of capture–mark–recapture data to estimate breeding population size during the spring for a population of wood ducks in Nevada. We then assessed the effect of one environmental variable and harvest pressure on annual changes in the breeding population size. Climatic conditions influencing water availability were strongly positively related to population growth rates of wood ducks in our study system. In contrast, harvest regulations and harvest rates did not affect population growth rates. We suggest efforts to conserve waterfowl should focus on the effects of habitat loss in breeding areas and climate change, which will likely affect precipitation regimes in the future. We demonstrate the utility of capture–mark–recapture methods to estimate abundance of species which are difficult to survey and test the impacts of anthropogenic harvest and climate on populations. Finally, our results continue to add to the importance of experimentation in applied conservation biology, where we believe that continued experiments on nonthreatened species will be critically important as researchers attempt to understand how to quantify and mitigate direct anthropogenic impacts in a changing world.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6875577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68755772019-11-29 Experimental harvest regulations reveal that water availability during spring, not harvest, affects change in a waterfowl population Sedinger, Benjamin S. Riecke, Thomas V. Nicolai, Christopher A. Woolstenhulme, Russell Henry, William G. Stewart, Kelley M. Ecol Evol Original Research Population change is regulated by vital rates that are influenced by environmental conditions, demographic stochasticity, and, increasingly, anthropogenic effects. Habitat destruction and climate change threaten the future of many wildlife populations, and there are additional concerns regarding the effects of harvest rates on demographic components of harvested organisms. Further, many population managers strictly manage harvest of wild organisms to mediate population trends of these populations. The goal of our study was to decouple harvest and environmental variability in a closely monitored population of wild ducks in North America, where we experimentally regulated harvest independently of environmental variation over a period of 4 years. We used 9 years of capture–mark–recapture data to estimate breeding population size during the spring for a population of wood ducks in Nevada. We then assessed the effect of one environmental variable and harvest pressure on annual changes in the breeding population size. Climatic conditions influencing water availability were strongly positively related to population growth rates of wood ducks in our study system. In contrast, harvest regulations and harvest rates did not affect population growth rates. We suggest efforts to conserve waterfowl should focus on the effects of habitat loss in breeding areas and climate change, which will likely affect precipitation regimes in the future. We demonstrate the utility of capture–mark–recapture methods to estimate abundance of species which are difficult to survey and test the impacts of anthropogenic harvest and climate on populations. Finally, our results continue to add to the importance of experimentation in applied conservation biology, where we believe that continued experiments on nonthreatened species will be critically important as researchers attempt to understand how to quantify and mitigate direct anthropogenic impacts in a changing world. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6875577/ /pubmed/31788208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5743 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sedinger, Benjamin S.
Riecke, Thomas V.
Nicolai, Christopher A.
Woolstenhulme, Russell
Henry, William G.
Stewart, Kelley M.
Experimental harvest regulations reveal that water availability during spring, not harvest, affects change in a waterfowl population
title Experimental harvest regulations reveal that water availability during spring, not harvest, affects change in a waterfowl population
title_full Experimental harvest regulations reveal that water availability during spring, not harvest, affects change in a waterfowl population
title_fullStr Experimental harvest regulations reveal that water availability during spring, not harvest, affects change in a waterfowl population
title_full_unstemmed Experimental harvest regulations reveal that water availability during spring, not harvest, affects change in a waterfowl population
title_short Experimental harvest regulations reveal that water availability during spring, not harvest, affects change in a waterfowl population
title_sort experimental harvest regulations reveal that water availability during spring, not harvest, affects change in a waterfowl population
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6875577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5743
work_keys_str_mv AT sedingerbenjamins experimentalharvestregulationsrevealthatwateravailabilityduringspringnotharvestaffectschangeinawaterfowlpopulation
AT rieckethomasv experimentalharvestregulationsrevealthatwateravailabilityduringspringnotharvestaffectschangeinawaterfowlpopulation
AT nicolaichristophera experimentalharvestregulationsrevealthatwateravailabilityduringspringnotharvestaffectschangeinawaterfowlpopulation
AT woolstenhulmerussell experimentalharvestregulationsrevealthatwateravailabilityduringspringnotharvestaffectschangeinawaterfowlpopulation
AT henrywilliamg experimentalharvestregulationsrevealthatwateravailabilityduringspringnotharvestaffectschangeinawaterfowlpopulation
AT stewartkelleym experimentalharvestregulationsrevealthatwateravailabilityduringspringnotharvestaffectschangeinawaterfowlpopulation