Cargando…

Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: The proliferation of computerized neuropsychological assessment devices (CNADs) for screening and monitoring cognitive impairment is increasing exponentially. Previous reviews of computerized tests for multiple sclerosis (MS) were primarily qualitative and did not rigorously compare CNAD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wojcik, Curtis M, Beier, Meghan, Costello, Kathleen, DeLuca, John, Feinstein, Anthony, Goverover, Yael, Gudesblatt, Mark, Jaworski, Michael, Kalb, Rosalind, Kostich, Lori, LaRocca, Nicholas G, Rodgers, Jonathan D, Benedict, Ralph HB
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6875828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31637963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458519879094
_version_ 1783473096977547264
author Wojcik, Curtis M
Beier, Meghan
Costello, Kathleen
DeLuca, John
Feinstein, Anthony
Goverover, Yael
Gudesblatt, Mark
Jaworski, Michael
Kalb, Rosalind
Kostich, Lori
LaRocca, Nicholas G
Rodgers, Jonathan D
Benedict, Ralph HB
author_facet Wojcik, Curtis M
Beier, Meghan
Costello, Kathleen
DeLuca, John
Feinstein, Anthony
Goverover, Yael
Gudesblatt, Mark
Jaworski, Michael
Kalb, Rosalind
Kostich, Lori
LaRocca, Nicholas G
Rodgers, Jonathan D
Benedict, Ralph HB
author_sort Wojcik, Curtis M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The proliferation of computerized neuropsychological assessment devices (CNADs) for screening and monitoring cognitive impairment is increasing exponentially. Previous reviews of computerized tests for multiple sclerosis (MS) were primarily qualitative and did not rigorously compare CNADs on psychometric properties. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to systematically review the literature on the use of CNADs in MS and identify test batteries and single tests with good evidence for reliability and validity. METHOD: A search of four major online databases was conducted for publications related to computerized testing and MS. Test–retest reliability and validity coefficients and effect sizes were recorded for each CNAD test, along with administration characteristics. RESULTS: We identified 11 batteries and 33 individual tests from 120 peer-reviewed articles meeting the inclusion criteria. CNADs with the strongest psychometric support include the CogState Brief Battery, Cognitive Drug Research Battery, NeuroTrax, CNS-Vital Signs, and computer-based administrations of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test. CONCLUSION: We identified several CNADs that are valid to screen for MS-related cognitive impairment, or to supplement full, conventional neuropsychological assessment. The necessity of testing with a technician, and in a controlled clinic/laboratory environment, remains uncertain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6875828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68758282019-12-24 Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review Wojcik, Curtis M Beier, Meghan Costello, Kathleen DeLuca, John Feinstein, Anthony Goverover, Yael Gudesblatt, Mark Jaworski, Michael Kalb, Rosalind Kostich, Lori LaRocca, Nicholas G Rodgers, Jonathan D Benedict, Ralph HB Mult Scler Systematic Review BACKGROUND: The proliferation of computerized neuropsychological assessment devices (CNADs) for screening and monitoring cognitive impairment is increasing exponentially. Previous reviews of computerized tests for multiple sclerosis (MS) were primarily qualitative and did not rigorously compare CNADs on psychometric properties. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to systematically review the literature on the use of CNADs in MS and identify test batteries and single tests with good evidence for reliability and validity. METHOD: A search of four major online databases was conducted for publications related to computerized testing and MS. Test–retest reliability and validity coefficients and effect sizes were recorded for each CNAD test, along with administration characteristics. RESULTS: We identified 11 batteries and 33 individual tests from 120 peer-reviewed articles meeting the inclusion criteria. CNADs with the strongest psychometric support include the CogState Brief Battery, Cognitive Drug Research Battery, NeuroTrax, CNS-Vital Signs, and computer-based administrations of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test. CONCLUSION: We identified several CNADs that are valid to screen for MS-related cognitive impairment, or to supplement full, conventional neuropsychological assessment. The necessity of testing with a technician, and in a controlled clinic/laboratory environment, remains uncertain. SAGE Publications 2019-10-22 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6875828/ /pubmed/31637963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458519879094 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Wojcik, Curtis M
Beier, Meghan
Costello, Kathleen
DeLuca, John
Feinstein, Anthony
Goverover, Yael
Gudesblatt, Mark
Jaworski, Michael
Kalb, Rosalind
Kostich, Lori
LaRocca, Nicholas G
Rodgers, Jonathan D
Benedict, Ralph HB
Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
title Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
title_full Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
title_fullStr Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
title_short Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
title_sort computerized neuropsychological assessment devices in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6875828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31637963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458519879094
work_keys_str_mv AT wojcikcurtism computerizedneuropsychologicalassessmentdevicesinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreview
AT beiermeghan computerizedneuropsychologicalassessmentdevicesinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreview
AT costellokathleen computerizedneuropsychologicalassessmentdevicesinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreview
AT delucajohn computerizedneuropsychologicalassessmentdevicesinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreview
AT feinsteinanthony computerizedneuropsychologicalassessmentdevicesinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreview
AT goveroveryael computerizedneuropsychologicalassessmentdevicesinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreview
AT gudesblattmark computerizedneuropsychologicalassessmentdevicesinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreview
AT jaworskimichael computerizedneuropsychologicalassessmentdevicesinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreview
AT kalbrosalind computerizedneuropsychologicalassessmentdevicesinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreview
AT kostichlori computerizedneuropsychologicalassessmentdevicesinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreview
AT laroccanicholasg computerizedneuropsychologicalassessmentdevicesinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreview
AT rodgersjonathand computerizedneuropsychologicalassessmentdevicesinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreview
AT benedictralphhb computerizedneuropsychologicalassessmentdevicesinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreview
AT computerizedneuropsychologicalassessmentdevicesinmultiplesclerosisasystematicreview