Cargando…
Verification of inflammation‐based prognostic marker as a prognostic indicator in hepatocellular carcinoma
AIM: Although inflammation‐based markers in cancer have been used for prognostic prediction, the most useful marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been established. We investigated the usefulness of various inflammation‐based markers in HCC patients after hepatectomy. METHODS: A total of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6875930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12286 |
_version_ | 1783473118226939904 |
---|---|
author | Yamamoto, Masateru Kobayashi, Tsuyoshi Kuroda, Shintaro Hamaoka, Michinori Okimoto, Sho Honmyo, Naruhiko Yamaguchi, Megumi Ohdan, Hideki |
author_facet | Yamamoto, Masateru Kobayashi, Tsuyoshi Kuroda, Shintaro Hamaoka, Michinori Okimoto, Sho Honmyo, Naruhiko Yamaguchi, Megumi Ohdan, Hideki |
author_sort | Yamamoto, Masateru |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Although inflammation‐based markers in cancer have been used for prognostic prediction, the most useful marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been established. We investigated the usefulness of various inflammation‐based markers in HCC patients after hepatectomy. METHODS: A total of 478 patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for HCC from 2009 to 2015 and were diagnosed with pathological HCC were included in this retrospective study. Inflammation‐based markers consisted of the C‐reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR), Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio and prognostic index. Univariate and multivariate analyses for overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) using the Cox proportional hazard model were carried out. Kaplan‐Meier analysis and log‐rank test were used for comparison of OS and DFS. To reduce influences of selection bias and confounders for stratifying CAR, clinicopathological characteristics of patients were balanced by propensity score matching. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis identified only high CAR (>0.027) as an indicator of poor OS, and high CAR and high GPS (1‐2) as indicators of poor DFS among inflammation‐based markers. After propensity score matching, 124 patients each with low CAR and high CAR were matched. High CAR was correlated with both poor OS and DFS. CONCLUSION: C‐reactive protein to albumin ratio was the most valuable prognostic indicator after hepatectomy for HCC among inflammation‐based markers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6875930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68759302019-11-29 Verification of inflammation‐based prognostic marker as a prognostic indicator in hepatocellular carcinoma Yamamoto, Masateru Kobayashi, Tsuyoshi Kuroda, Shintaro Hamaoka, Michinori Okimoto, Sho Honmyo, Naruhiko Yamaguchi, Megumi Ohdan, Hideki Ann Gastroenterol Surg Original Articles AIM: Although inflammation‐based markers in cancer have been used for prognostic prediction, the most useful marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been established. We investigated the usefulness of various inflammation‐based markers in HCC patients after hepatectomy. METHODS: A total of 478 patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for HCC from 2009 to 2015 and were diagnosed with pathological HCC were included in this retrospective study. Inflammation‐based markers consisted of the C‐reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR), Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio and prognostic index. Univariate and multivariate analyses for overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) using the Cox proportional hazard model were carried out. Kaplan‐Meier analysis and log‐rank test were used for comparison of OS and DFS. To reduce influences of selection bias and confounders for stratifying CAR, clinicopathological characteristics of patients were balanced by propensity score matching. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis identified only high CAR (>0.027) as an indicator of poor OS, and high CAR and high GPS (1‐2) as indicators of poor DFS among inflammation‐based markers. After propensity score matching, 124 patients each with low CAR and high CAR were matched. High CAR was correlated with both poor OS and DFS. CONCLUSION: C‐reactive protein to albumin ratio was the most valuable prognostic indicator after hepatectomy for HCC among inflammation‐based markers. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6875930/ /pubmed/31788655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12286 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Yamamoto, Masateru Kobayashi, Tsuyoshi Kuroda, Shintaro Hamaoka, Michinori Okimoto, Sho Honmyo, Naruhiko Yamaguchi, Megumi Ohdan, Hideki Verification of inflammation‐based prognostic marker as a prognostic indicator in hepatocellular carcinoma |
title | Verification of inflammation‐based prognostic marker as a prognostic indicator in hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_full | Verification of inflammation‐based prognostic marker as a prognostic indicator in hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Verification of inflammation‐based prognostic marker as a prognostic indicator in hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Verification of inflammation‐based prognostic marker as a prognostic indicator in hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_short | Verification of inflammation‐based prognostic marker as a prognostic indicator in hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_sort | verification of inflammation‐based prognostic marker as a prognostic indicator in hepatocellular carcinoma |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6875930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12286 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yamamotomasateru verificationofinflammationbasedprognosticmarkerasaprognosticindicatorinhepatocellularcarcinoma AT kobayashitsuyoshi verificationofinflammationbasedprognosticmarkerasaprognosticindicatorinhepatocellularcarcinoma AT kurodashintaro verificationofinflammationbasedprognosticmarkerasaprognosticindicatorinhepatocellularcarcinoma AT hamaokamichinori verificationofinflammationbasedprognosticmarkerasaprognosticindicatorinhepatocellularcarcinoma AT okimotosho verificationofinflammationbasedprognosticmarkerasaprognosticindicatorinhepatocellularcarcinoma AT honmyonaruhiko verificationofinflammationbasedprognosticmarkerasaprognosticindicatorinhepatocellularcarcinoma AT yamaguchimegumi verificationofinflammationbasedprognosticmarkerasaprognosticindicatorinhepatocellularcarcinoma AT ohdanhideki verificationofinflammationbasedprognosticmarkerasaprognosticindicatorinhepatocellularcarcinoma |