Cargando…

Verification of inflammation‐based prognostic marker as a prognostic indicator in hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM: Although inflammation‐based markers in cancer have been used for prognostic prediction, the most useful marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been established. We investigated the usefulness of various inflammation‐based markers in HCC patients after hepatectomy. METHODS: A total of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamamoto, Masateru, Kobayashi, Tsuyoshi, Kuroda, Shintaro, Hamaoka, Michinori, Okimoto, Sho, Honmyo, Naruhiko, Yamaguchi, Megumi, Ohdan, Hideki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6875930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12286
_version_ 1783473118226939904
author Yamamoto, Masateru
Kobayashi, Tsuyoshi
Kuroda, Shintaro
Hamaoka, Michinori
Okimoto, Sho
Honmyo, Naruhiko
Yamaguchi, Megumi
Ohdan, Hideki
author_facet Yamamoto, Masateru
Kobayashi, Tsuyoshi
Kuroda, Shintaro
Hamaoka, Michinori
Okimoto, Sho
Honmyo, Naruhiko
Yamaguchi, Megumi
Ohdan, Hideki
author_sort Yamamoto, Masateru
collection PubMed
description AIM: Although inflammation‐based markers in cancer have been used for prognostic prediction, the most useful marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been established. We investigated the usefulness of various inflammation‐based markers in HCC patients after hepatectomy. METHODS: A total of 478 patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for HCC from 2009 to 2015 and were diagnosed with pathological HCC were included in this retrospective study. Inflammation‐based markers consisted of the C‐reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR), Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio and prognostic index. Univariate and multivariate analyses for overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) using the Cox proportional hazard model were carried out. Kaplan‐Meier analysis and log‐rank test were used for comparison of OS and DFS. To reduce influences of selection bias and confounders for stratifying CAR, clinicopathological characteristics of patients were balanced by propensity score matching. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis identified only high CAR (>0.027) as an indicator of poor OS, and high CAR and high GPS (1‐2) as indicators of poor DFS among inflammation‐based markers. After propensity score matching, 124 patients each with low CAR and high CAR were matched. High CAR was correlated with both poor OS and DFS. CONCLUSION: C‐reactive protein to albumin ratio was the most valuable prognostic indicator after hepatectomy for HCC among inflammation‐based markers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6875930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68759302019-11-29 Verification of inflammation‐based prognostic marker as a prognostic indicator in hepatocellular carcinoma Yamamoto, Masateru Kobayashi, Tsuyoshi Kuroda, Shintaro Hamaoka, Michinori Okimoto, Sho Honmyo, Naruhiko Yamaguchi, Megumi Ohdan, Hideki Ann Gastroenterol Surg Original Articles AIM: Although inflammation‐based markers in cancer have been used for prognostic prediction, the most useful marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been established. We investigated the usefulness of various inflammation‐based markers in HCC patients after hepatectomy. METHODS: A total of 478 patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for HCC from 2009 to 2015 and were diagnosed with pathological HCC were included in this retrospective study. Inflammation‐based markers consisted of the C‐reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR), Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio and prognostic index. Univariate and multivariate analyses for overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) using the Cox proportional hazard model were carried out. Kaplan‐Meier analysis and log‐rank test were used for comparison of OS and DFS. To reduce influences of selection bias and confounders for stratifying CAR, clinicopathological characteristics of patients were balanced by propensity score matching. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis identified only high CAR (>0.027) as an indicator of poor OS, and high CAR and high GPS (1‐2) as indicators of poor DFS among inflammation‐based markers. After propensity score matching, 124 patients each with low CAR and high CAR were matched. High CAR was correlated with both poor OS and DFS. CONCLUSION: C‐reactive protein to albumin ratio was the most valuable prognostic indicator after hepatectomy for HCC among inflammation‐based markers. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6875930/ /pubmed/31788655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12286 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Yamamoto, Masateru
Kobayashi, Tsuyoshi
Kuroda, Shintaro
Hamaoka, Michinori
Okimoto, Sho
Honmyo, Naruhiko
Yamaguchi, Megumi
Ohdan, Hideki
Verification of inflammation‐based prognostic marker as a prognostic indicator in hepatocellular carcinoma
title Verification of inflammation‐based prognostic marker as a prognostic indicator in hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full Verification of inflammation‐based prognostic marker as a prognostic indicator in hepatocellular carcinoma
title_fullStr Verification of inflammation‐based prognostic marker as a prognostic indicator in hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Verification of inflammation‐based prognostic marker as a prognostic indicator in hepatocellular carcinoma
title_short Verification of inflammation‐based prognostic marker as a prognostic indicator in hepatocellular carcinoma
title_sort verification of inflammation‐based prognostic marker as a prognostic indicator in hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6875930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12286
work_keys_str_mv AT yamamotomasateru verificationofinflammationbasedprognosticmarkerasaprognosticindicatorinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT kobayashitsuyoshi verificationofinflammationbasedprognosticmarkerasaprognosticindicatorinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT kurodashintaro verificationofinflammationbasedprognosticmarkerasaprognosticindicatorinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT hamaokamichinori verificationofinflammationbasedprognosticmarkerasaprognosticindicatorinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT okimotosho verificationofinflammationbasedprognosticmarkerasaprognosticindicatorinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT honmyonaruhiko verificationofinflammationbasedprognosticmarkerasaprognosticindicatorinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT yamaguchimegumi verificationofinflammationbasedprognosticmarkerasaprognosticindicatorinhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT ohdanhideki verificationofinflammationbasedprognosticmarkerasaprognosticindicatorinhepatocellularcarcinoma