Cargando…

Pathological complete response (pCR) with or without the residual intraductal carcinoma component following preoperative treatment for pancreatic cancer: Revisiting the definition of “pCR” from the prognostic standpoint

BACKGROUND AND AIM: There are no previous reports describing the prognostic significance of the residual intraductal carcinoma component (carcinoma in situ [CIS]) following preoperative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamada, Daisaku, Takahashi, Hidenori, Asukai, Kei, Hasegawa, Shinichiro, Tomokuni, Akira, Wada, Hiroshi, Akita, Hirofumi, Yasui, Masayohi, Miyata, Hiroshi, Ishikawa, Osamu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6875936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12288
_version_ 1783473118928437248
author Yamada, Daisaku
Takahashi, Hidenori
Asukai, Kei
Hasegawa, Shinichiro
Tomokuni, Akira
Wada, Hiroshi
Akita, Hirofumi
Yasui, Masayohi
Miyata, Hiroshi
Ishikawa, Osamu
author_facet Yamada, Daisaku
Takahashi, Hidenori
Asukai, Kei
Hasegawa, Shinichiro
Tomokuni, Akira
Wada, Hiroshi
Akita, Hirofumi
Yasui, Masayohi
Miyata, Hiroshi
Ishikawa, Osamu
author_sort Yamada, Daisaku
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: There are no previous reports describing the prognostic significance of the residual intraductal carcinoma component (carcinoma in situ [CIS]) following preoperative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic significance of a minimal residual CIS in cases with complete absence of an invasive component after preoperative treatment for PDAC. METHODS: Eighty‐one of 594 PDAC patients with preoperative treatment and subsequent surgery in our institute showed remarkable remission in the invasive component, which included 48 patients with the minimal residual invasive component (Min‐inv group) and 33 with absence of an invasive component (No‐inv group). We assessed the survival of these patients in association with the presence or absence of an invasive component and intraductal CIS. RESULTS: Five‐year overall survival in the No‐inv group patients was significantly better than that of the Min‐inv group patients (82%/66%, P = .041). Among the 33 patients in the No‐inv group, residual CIS was observed in 16 patients (CIS‐positive group), and the remaining 17 patients had no residual CIS (CIS‐negative group). There was no significant difference in survival between patients in the CIS‐positive and CIS‐negative groups (92%/78%, P = .31). CONCLUSIONS: Residual CIS in the absence of an invasive component after preoperative treatment does not yield a prognostic impact after receiving perioperative treatment for PDAC. It might be reasonable to define pathological complete response (pCR) from the prognostic standpoint as follows: pCR is the complete absence of an invasive carcinoma component regardless of residual CIS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6875936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68759362019-11-29 Pathological complete response (pCR) with or without the residual intraductal carcinoma component following preoperative treatment for pancreatic cancer: Revisiting the definition of “pCR” from the prognostic standpoint Yamada, Daisaku Takahashi, Hidenori Asukai, Kei Hasegawa, Shinichiro Tomokuni, Akira Wada, Hiroshi Akita, Hirofumi Yasui, Masayohi Miyata, Hiroshi Ishikawa, Osamu Ann Gastroenterol Surg Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIM: There are no previous reports describing the prognostic significance of the residual intraductal carcinoma component (carcinoma in situ [CIS]) following preoperative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic significance of a minimal residual CIS in cases with complete absence of an invasive component after preoperative treatment for PDAC. METHODS: Eighty‐one of 594 PDAC patients with preoperative treatment and subsequent surgery in our institute showed remarkable remission in the invasive component, which included 48 patients with the minimal residual invasive component (Min‐inv group) and 33 with absence of an invasive component (No‐inv group). We assessed the survival of these patients in association with the presence or absence of an invasive component and intraductal CIS. RESULTS: Five‐year overall survival in the No‐inv group patients was significantly better than that of the Min‐inv group patients (82%/66%, P = .041). Among the 33 patients in the No‐inv group, residual CIS was observed in 16 patients (CIS‐positive group), and the remaining 17 patients had no residual CIS (CIS‐negative group). There was no significant difference in survival between patients in the CIS‐positive and CIS‐negative groups (92%/78%, P = .31). CONCLUSIONS: Residual CIS in the absence of an invasive component after preoperative treatment does not yield a prognostic impact after receiving perioperative treatment for PDAC. It might be reasonable to define pathological complete response (pCR) from the prognostic standpoint as follows: pCR is the complete absence of an invasive carcinoma component regardless of residual CIS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6875936/ /pubmed/31788656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12288 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Yamada, Daisaku
Takahashi, Hidenori
Asukai, Kei
Hasegawa, Shinichiro
Tomokuni, Akira
Wada, Hiroshi
Akita, Hirofumi
Yasui, Masayohi
Miyata, Hiroshi
Ishikawa, Osamu
Pathological complete response (pCR) with or without the residual intraductal carcinoma component following preoperative treatment for pancreatic cancer: Revisiting the definition of “pCR” from the prognostic standpoint
title Pathological complete response (pCR) with or without the residual intraductal carcinoma component following preoperative treatment for pancreatic cancer: Revisiting the definition of “pCR” from the prognostic standpoint
title_full Pathological complete response (pCR) with or without the residual intraductal carcinoma component following preoperative treatment for pancreatic cancer: Revisiting the definition of “pCR” from the prognostic standpoint
title_fullStr Pathological complete response (pCR) with or without the residual intraductal carcinoma component following preoperative treatment for pancreatic cancer: Revisiting the definition of “pCR” from the prognostic standpoint
title_full_unstemmed Pathological complete response (pCR) with or without the residual intraductal carcinoma component following preoperative treatment for pancreatic cancer: Revisiting the definition of “pCR” from the prognostic standpoint
title_short Pathological complete response (pCR) with or without the residual intraductal carcinoma component following preoperative treatment for pancreatic cancer: Revisiting the definition of “pCR” from the prognostic standpoint
title_sort pathological complete response (pcr) with or without the residual intraductal carcinoma component following preoperative treatment for pancreatic cancer: revisiting the definition of “pcr” from the prognostic standpoint
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6875936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12288
work_keys_str_mv AT yamadadaisaku pathologicalcompleteresponsepcrwithorwithouttheresidualintraductalcarcinomacomponentfollowingpreoperativetreatmentforpancreaticcancerrevisitingthedefinitionofpcrfromtheprognosticstandpoint
AT takahashihidenori pathologicalcompleteresponsepcrwithorwithouttheresidualintraductalcarcinomacomponentfollowingpreoperativetreatmentforpancreaticcancerrevisitingthedefinitionofpcrfromtheprognosticstandpoint
AT asukaikei pathologicalcompleteresponsepcrwithorwithouttheresidualintraductalcarcinomacomponentfollowingpreoperativetreatmentforpancreaticcancerrevisitingthedefinitionofpcrfromtheprognosticstandpoint
AT hasegawashinichiro pathologicalcompleteresponsepcrwithorwithouttheresidualintraductalcarcinomacomponentfollowingpreoperativetreatmentforpancreaticcancerrevisitingthedefinitionofpcrfromtheprognosticstandpoint
AT tomokuniakira pathologicalcompleteresponsepcrwithorwithouttheresidualintraductalcarcinomacomponentfollowingpreoperativetreatmentforpancreaticcancerrevisitingthedefinitionofpcrfromtheprognosticstandpoint
AT wadahiroshi pathologicalcompleteresponsepcrwithorwithouttheresidualintraductalcarcinomacomponentfollowingpreoperativetreatmentforpancreaticcancerrevisitingthedefinitionofpcrfromtheprognosticstandpoint
AT akitahirofumi pathologicalcompleteresponsepcrwithorwithouttheresidualintraductalcarcinomacomponentfollowingpreoperativetreatmentforpancreaticcancerrevisitingthedefinitionofpcrfromtheprognosticstandpoint
AT yasuimasayohi pathologicalcompleteresponsepcrwithorwithouttheresidualintraductalcarcinomacomponentfollowingpreoperativetreatmentforpancreaticcancerrevisitingthedefinitionofpcrfromtheprognosticstandpoint
AT miyatahiroshi pathologicalcompleteresponsepcrwithorwithouttheresidualintraductalcarcinomacomponentfollowingpreoperativetreatmentforpancreaticcancerrevisitingthedefinitionofpcrfromtheprognosticstandpoint
AT ishikawaosamu pathologicalcompleteresponsepcrwithorwithouttheresidualintraductalcarcinomacomponentfollowingpreoperativetreatmentforpancreaticcancerrevisitingthedefinitionofpcrfromtheprognosticstandpoint