Cargando…

Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals

BACKGROUND: Precision medicine is set to deliver a rich new data set of genomic information. However, the number of certified specialists in the United States is small, with only 4244 genetic counselors and 1302 clinical geneticists. We conducted a national survey of 264 medical professionals to eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGrath, Scott P., Walton, Nephi, Williams, Marc S., Kim, Katherine K., Bastola, Kiran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6876107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31760949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4679-8
_version_ 1783473157062000640
author McGrath, Scott P.
Walton, Nephi
Williams, Marc S.
Kim, Katherine K.
Bastola, Kiran
author_facet McGrath, Scott P.
Walton, Nephi
Williams, Marc S.
Kim, Katherine K.
Bastola, Kiran
author_sort McGrath, Scott P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Precision medicine is set to deliver a rich new data set of genomic information. However, the number of certified specialists in the United States is small, with only 4244 genetic counselors and 1302 clinical geneticists. We conducted a national survey of 264 medical professionals to evaluate how they interpret genetic test results, determine their confidence and self-efficacy of interpreting genetic test results with patients, and capture their opinions and experiences with direct-to-consumer genetic tests (DTC-GT). METHODS: Participants were grouped into two categories, genetic specialists (genetic counselors and clinical geneticists) and medical providers (primary care, internists, physicians assistants, advanced nurse practitioners, etc.). The survey (full instrument can be found in the Additional file 1) presented three genetic test report scenarios for interpretation: a genetic risk for diabetes, genomic sequencing for symptoms report implicating a potential HMN7B: distal hereditary motor neuropathy VIIB diagnosis, and a statin-induced myopathy risk. Participants were also asked about their opinions on DTC-GT results and rank their own perceived level of preparedness to review genetic test results with patients. RESULTS: The rates of correctly interpreting results were relatively high (74.4% for the providers compared to the specialist’s 83.4%) and age, prior genetic test consultation experience, and level of trust assigned to the reports were associated with higher correct interpretation rates. The self-selected efficacy and the level of preparedness to consult on a patient’s genetic results were higher for the specialists than the provider group. CONCLUSION: Specialists remain the best group to assist patients with DTC-GT, however, primary care providers may still provide accurate interpretation of test results when specialists are unavailable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6876107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68761072019-11-29 Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals McGrath, Scott P. Walton, Nephi Williams, Marc S. Kim, Katherine K. Bastola, Kiran BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Precision medicine is set to deliver a rich new data set of genomic information. However, the number of certified specialists in the United States is small, with only 4244 genetic counselors and 1302 clinical geneticists. We conducted a national survey of 264 medical professionals to evaluate how they interpret genetic test results, determine their confidence and self-efficacy of interpreting genetic test results with patients, and capture their opinions and experiences with direct-to-consumer genetic tests (DTC-GT). METHODS: Participants were grouped into two categories, genetic specialists (genetic counselors and clinical geneticists) and medical providers (primary care, internists, physicians assistants, advanced nurse practitioners, etc.). The survey (full instrument can be found in the Additional file 1) presented three genetic test report scenarios for interpretation: a genetic risk for diabetes, genomic sequencing for symptoms report implicating a potential HMN7B: distal hereditary motor neuropathy VIIB diagnosis, and a statin-induced myopathy risk. Participants were also asked about their opinions on DTC-GT results and rank their own perceived level of preparedness to review genetic test results with patients. RESULTS: The rates of correctly interpreting results were relatively high (74.4% for the providers compared to the specialist’s 83.4%) and age, prior genetic test consultation experience, and level of trust assigned to the reports were associated with higher correct interpretation rates. The self-selected efficacy and the level of preparedness to consult on a patient’s genetic results were higher for the specialists than the provider group. CONCLUSION: Specialists remain the best group to assist patients with DTC-GT, however, primary care providers may still provide accurate interpretation of test results when specialists are unavailable. BioMed Central 2019-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6876107/ /pubmed/31760949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4679-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
McGrath, Scott P.
Walton, Nephi
Williams, Marc S.
Kim, Katherine K.
Bastola, Kiran
Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals
title Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals
title_full Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals
title_fullStr Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals
title_full_unstemmed Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals
title_short Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals
title_sort are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (dtc-gt) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6876107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31760949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4679-8
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgrathscottp areproviderspreparedforgenomicmedicineinterpretationofdirecttoconsumergenetictestingdtcgtresultsandgeneticselfefficacybymedicalprofessionals
AT waltonnephi areproviderspreparedforgenomicmedicineinterpretationofdirecttoconsumergenetictestingdtcgtresultsandgeneticselfefficacybymedicalprofessionals
AT williamsmarcs areproviderspreparedforgenomicmedicineinterpretationofdirecttoconsumergenetictestingdtcgtresultsandgeneticselfefficacybymedicalprofessionals
AT kimkatherinek areproviderspreparedforgenomicmedicineinterpretationofdirecttoconsumergenetictestingdtcgtresultsandgeneticselfefficacybymedicalprofessionals
AT bastolakiran areproviderspreparedforgenomicmedicineinterpretationofdirecttoconsumergenetictestingdtcgtresultsandgeneticselfefficacybymedicalprofessionals