Cargando…
Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals
BACKGROUND: Precision medicine is set to deliver a rich new data set of genomic information. However, the number of certified specialists in the United States is small, with only 4244 genetic counselors and 1302 clinical geneticists. We conducted a national survey of 264 medical professionals to eva...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6876107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31760949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4679-8 |
_version_ | 1783473157062000640 |
---|---|
author | McGrath, Scott P. Walton, Nephi Williams, Marc S. Kim, Katherine K. Bastola, Kiran |
author_facet | McGrath, Scott P. Walton, Nephi Williams, Marc S. Kim, Katherine K. Bastola, Kiran |
author_sort | McGrath, Scott P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Precision medicine is set to deliver a rich new data set of genomic information. However, the number of certified specialists in the United States is small, with only 4244 genetic counselors and 1302 clinical geneticists. We conducted a national survey of 264 medical professionals to evaluate how they interpret genetic test results, determine their confidence and self-efficacy of interpreting genetic test results with patients, and capture their opinions and experiences with direct-to-consumer genetic tests (DTC-GT). METHODS: Participants were grouped into two categories, genetic specialists (genetic counselors and clinical geneticists) and medical providers (primary care, internists, physicians assistants, advanced nurse practitioners, etc.). The survey (full instrument can be found in the Additional file 1) presented three genetic test report scenarios for interpretation: a genetic risk for diabetes, genomic sequencing for symptoms report implicating a potential HMN7B: distal hereditary motor neuropathy VIIB diagnosis, and a statin-induced myopathy risk. Participants were also asked about their opinions on DTC-GT results and rank their own perceived level of preparedness to review genetic test results with patients. RESULTS: The rates of correctly interpreting results were relatively high (74.4% for the providers compared to the specialist’s 83.4%) and age, prior genetic test consultation experience, and level of trust assigned to the reports were associated with higher correct interpretation rates. The self-selected efficacy and the level of preparedness to consult on a patient’s genetic results were higher for the specialists than the provider group. CONCLUSION: Specialists remain the best group to assist patients with DTC-GT, however, primary care providers may still provide accurate interpretation of test results when specialists are unavailable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6876107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68761072019-11-29 Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals McGrath, Scott P. Walton, Nephi Williams, Marc S. Kim, Katherine K. Bastola, Kiran BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Precision medicine is set to deliver a rich new data set of genomic information. However, the number of certified specialists in the United States is small, with only 4244 genetic counselors and 1302 clinical geneticists. We conducted a national survey of 264 medical professionals to evaluate how they interpret genetic test results, determine their confidence and self-efficacy of interpreting genetic test results with patients, and capture their opinions and experiences with direct-to-consumer genetic tests (DTC-GT). METHODS: Participants were grouped into two categories, genetic specialists (genetic counselors and clinical geneticists) and medical providers (primary care, internists, physicians assistants, advanced nurse practitioners, etc.). The survey (full instrument can be found in the Additional file 1) presented three genetic test report scenarios for interpretation: a genetic risk for diabetes, genomic sequencing for symptoms report implicating a potential HMN7B: distal hereditary motor neuropathy VIIB diagnosis, and a statin-induced myopathy risk. Participants were also asked about their opinions on DTC-GT results and rank their own perceived level of preparedness to review genetic test results with patients. RESULTS: The rates of correctly interpreting results were relatively high (74.4% for the providers compared to the specialist’s 83.4%) and age, prior genetic test consultation experience, and level of trust assigned to the reports were associated with higher correct interpretation rates. The self-selected efficacy and the level of preparedness to consult on a patient’s genetic results were higher for the specialists than the provider group. CONCLUSION: Specialists remain the best group to assist patients with DTC-GT, however, primary care providers may still provide accurate interpretation of test results when specialists are unavailable. BioMed Central 2019-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6876107/ /pubmed/31760949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4679-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article McGrath, Scott P. Walton, Nephi Williams, Marc S. Kim, Katherine K. Bastola, Kiran Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals |
title | Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals |
title_full | Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals |
title_fullStr | Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals |
title_full_unstemmed | Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals |
title_short | Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals |
title_sort | are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (dtc-gt) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6876107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31760949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4679-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcgrathscottp areproviderspreparedforgenomicmedicineinterpretationofdirecttoconsumergenetictestingdtcgtresultsandgeneticselfefficacybymedicalprofessionals AT waltonnephi areproviderspreparedforgenomicmedicineinterpretationofdirecttoconsumergenetictestingdtcgtresultsandgeneticselfefficacybymedicalprofessionals AT williamsmarcs areproviderspreparedforgenomicmedicineinterpretationofdirecttoconsumergenetictestingdtcgtresultsandgeneticselfefficacybymedicalprofessionals AT kimkatherinek areproviderspreparedforgenomicmedicineinterpretationofdirecttoconsumergenetictestingdtcgtresultsandgeneticselfefficacybymedicalprofessionals AT bastolakiran areproviderspreparedforgenomicmedicineinterpretationofdirecttoconsumergenetictestingdtcgtresultsandgeneticselfefficacybymedicalprofessionals |