Cargando…

Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist

BACKGROUND: Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) currently lack a consensus on substantial quality and safety standards. As such, the number of individuals engaging with untrustworthy mHealth apps continues to grow at a steady pace. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate end-us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Haasteren, Afua, Gille, Felix, Fadda, Marta, Vayena, Effy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6876327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31803490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207619886463
_version_ 1783473189093900288
author van Haasteren, Afua
Gille, Felix
Fadda, Marta
Vayena, Effy
author_facet van Haasteren, Afua
Gille, Felix
Fadda, Marta
Vayena, Effy
author_sort van Haasteren, Afua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) currently lack a consensus on substantial quality and safety standards. As such, the number of individuals engaging with untrustworthy mHealth apps continues to grow at a steady pace. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate end-users’ opinions on the features or actions necessary for trustworthy mHealth apps; and to convey this information to app developers via a succinct but informative checklist: the mHealth app trustworthiness checklist. METHODS: The checklist was formulated in three stages: (a) a literature review of studies identified the desirable features of the most prolific mHealth apps (health and fitness apps); (b) four focus group sessions with past or current users of these apps (n = 20); and (c) expert feedback on whether the checklist items are conceivable in a real-life setting (n = 6). RESULTS: Five major themes emerged from the focus group discussions: informational content, organizational attributes, societal influence, technology-related features, and user control factors. The mHealth app trustworthiness checklist was developed to incorporate these five themes and subsequently modified following expert consultation. In addition to the trustworthiness themes, we identified features that lie between trust and mistrust (limited digital literacy and indifference) as well as 10 features and actions that cause end-users to mistrust mHealth apps. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to the evidence base on the attributes of trustworthy mHealth apps. The mHealth app trustworthiness checklist is a useful tool in advancing continued efforts to ensure that health technologies are trustworthy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6876327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68763272019-12-04 Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist van Haasteren, Afua Gille, Felix Fadda, Marta Vayena, Effy Digit Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) currently lack a consensus on substantial quality and safety standards. As such, the number of individuals engaging with untrustworthy mHealth apps continues to grow at a steady pace. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate end-users’ opinions on the features or actions necessary for trustworthy mHealth apps; and to convey this information to app developers via a succinct but informative checklist: the mHealth app trustworthiness checklist. METHODS: The checklist was formulated in three stages: (a) a literature review of studies identified the desirable features of the most prolific mHealth apps (health and fitness apps); (b) four focus group sessions with past or current users of these apps (n = 20); and (c) expert feedback on whether the checklist items are conceivable in a real-life setting (n = 6). RESULTS: Five major themes emerged from the focus group discussions: informational content, organizational attributes, societal influence, technology-related features, and user control factors. The mHealth app trustworthiness checklist was developed to incorporate these five themes and subsequently modified following expert consultation. In addition to the trustworthiness themes, we identified features that lie between trust and mistrust (limited digital literacy and indifference) as well as 10 features and actions that cause end-users to mistrust mHealth apps. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to the evidence base on the attributes of trustworthy mHealth apps. The mHealth app trustworthiness checklist is a useful tool in advancing continued efforts to ensure that health technologies are trustworthy. SAGE Publications 2019-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6876327/ /pubmed/31803490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207619886463 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
van Haasteren, Afua
Gille, Felix
Fadda, Marta
Vayena, Effy
Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist
title Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist
title_full Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist
title_fullStr Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist
title_full_unstemmed Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist
title_short Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist
title_sort development of the mhealth app trustworthiness checklist
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6876327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31803490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207619886463
work_keys_str_mv AT vanhaasterenafua developmentofthemhealthapptrustworthinesschecklist
AT gillefelix developmentofthemhealthapptrustworthinesschecklist
AT faddamarta developmentofthemhealthapptrustworthinesschecklist
AT vayenaeffy developmentofthemhealthapptrustworthinesschecklist